中国建设社会主义新农村的思考——四川建设社会主义新农村模式初探

本文根据四川的资源、人口、环境现状,借鉴发达国家现代农业发展的经验,设计了依靠科技进步,建设社会主义新农村的模式。采用7＋3＋1＋1土地科学规划方案,克服小农经营的弊端,建设适度规模商品粮、畜、果、蔬、花卉基地农业,配合农副产品加工产业的建设,逐步建设现代农业,促进“生产发展”。通过改善生活环境、居住条件、落实增收措施与建立社保四个方面实现生活宽裕,既用现代自然科学技术解决都市新村人与自然和谐的问题,又用古今中外社会和谐的理念,创造适合现代社会的社会主义和谐文化模式,实现“乡风文明”。通过土地、农宅地的科学规划,建设生态住宅与现代农业基地有机结合与和谐的新村,建设空中自留地实现建房还耕、还绿;建设高效沼气设施,解决农业生产与农村生活产生的可降解废弃物的处理以及绿色栽培的肥源问题;实现资源循环利用与节约型模式,组装实用科技,实现“村容整洁”。引进城市社区的管理模式,形成政府、企业、农户三个主体,实施组织者、监督者、服务者三角鼎立的“管理民主”模式。     

经济全球化背景下的中国税制优化

一、经济全球化背景下我国税制优化的总体目标税制优化是一个不断向前推进并变化的系统工程。不同时期税制优化的目标不完全相同,这是由国家所处一定历史时期的社会经济环境、社会经济发展的主要任务决定的。经济全球化及加入WTO,将使我国经济的增长方式、运行质量、产业结构等     

依托旅游业促进农牧民增收和民族县域经济发展——新疆布尔津县经济发展路径调查报告

布尔津是一个以发展旅游业为主的县城,通过这些年的发展,布尔津由贫困县一跃成为自治区的经济先进县,旅游业发展成果丰硕,成为农牧民生活水平提高和县域经济发展的带动点,社会影响深远。正由于此,本文对布尔津县依托旅游业促进经济发展的经验和初步成效进行了调查与研究。     

Accessing Tourists’ Unconscious Associations about International Destinations: Data Fuzzification of Reaction Times in the Implicit Association Test

Starting with the proposition that shorter reaction time implies stronger implicit preference, this study assesses destination-related top-of-mind awareness (TOMA) by examining respondent reaction time to specific destination icons. A total 87 college students were recruited to complete self-report surveys and computer-based implicit association tests (IAT). The results show that participants’ responses vary depending on the two measures (i.e., self-report surveys and IATs). Through a data fuzzification method, the study demonstrates that the IAT would enhance our understanding of tourist TOMA, particularly related to familiarity issues. The implications of the study pertain to destination marketing are fully discussed.     

公司治理结构与多元化经营

2003年我国721家A股上市公司的多元化和相关财务数据表明,近一半的企业选择或维持多元化经营.经研究发现:股权结构对公司多元化经营决策和多元化绩效有显著影响:非国有控股公司较多实行多元化经营并且多元化绩效较好;控股股东持股比例越高,越不可能实行多元化经营,多元化绩效也越好.董事会特征、管理层持股对多元化经营决策和多元化绩效基本没有影响.公司负债率越高,实行多元化经营的可能性越大,多元化绩效越好.研究结果支持代理理论,多元化经营是控股股东谋取私利的方式.     

我区高校校园文化建设之不足及其对策研究

校园文化对高校教育目标的实现,起着不可或缺的作用,它对大学生的素质以及人生幸福观念的培养,都要比单纯的课堂教育效果持久、影响深远.我区高校的校园文化建设取得了一些成就,但也存在着许多尚待解决的问题.本文提出一些可操作性的解决对策.     

A pilot study of venture capital investment appraisal in Australia

Illiquidity, volatile returns and lack of information are sources of the high risk that characterise the investments made by venture capitalists (VCs). Despite the importance of such investments in the contemporary business and technological environment, and the associated risk-related difficulties, little Australian research has been conducted into the decision-making processes of VCs. This study investigates both the investment process and some of the strategies used by VCs for reducing selected risks. The specific source of risk examined is information asymmetry, which is caused by lack of information on the part of the VCs, and which can lead to the added risks of adverse selection and moral hazard. Four Australian VC firms were surveyed using a comprehensive open-ended questionnaire. A manual content analysis was employed to analyse the questionnaire responses. Consistent with prior research, the Australian VCs sampled are found to employ Berger and Udell' three steps of investment: selection, contracting and monitoring. Furthermore, the semi-formal selection step of the investment process is found to consist of three distinct stages: deal sourcing, screening and evaluation. A number of techniques are used to minimise the risks of information asymmetry during the screening and evaluation stages, as well as during the later steps of contracting and monitorin.     

The Exploitation of Inside Information at the Wall Street Journal: A Test of Strong Form Efficiency

The study examines if tradings on stocks based on the inside information about the “Heard on the Street” column of the Wall Street Journal could generate abnormal returns. We found significant abnormal returns on days t =?1 and t= 0 (publication date) for the stocks related to insider trading. For a comparable control group of noninsider traded stocks, the abnormal returns were not significant on day t=?1 but were significant on day t= 0. The abnormal returns for the insider trade group on days t=?1 and t= 0 were greater than the returns for the control group. The results indicate that the inside information was the cause for the differences.