The Regulation of Professional Migration: Insights from the Health and IT Sectors in ASEAN

This paper develops several indicators to measure the extent and depth of rules governing international migration. It is set in the context of moves towards further liberalisation of services trade and associated labour mobility (Mode 4) under GATS and related regional trading arrangements. Ten Southeast Asian countries at various stages of economic development are examined as a case study, with special reference to health care and information technology. These sectors are priority sectors for regional cooperation in services trade in ASEAN, but were expected to represent opposite extremes in terms of the regulation of migration. The study finds that the more advanced countries tend to have more liberal regimes for international movements of skilled manpower, although there were smaller differences regarding general visa and work permit arrangements. Generic restrictions on mobility were related to trade policies, as well as to direct barriers (often country‐specific) to migration. They included minimum salary requirement, levies on foreign workers, economic needs tests, and limitations related to language, education and job experience. Controls were more extensive in the health care sector, related to social considerations as well as professional organisational interests.     

WORD OUTLOOK

As the world economy enters the 1990% a significant reorientation of growth and demand is taking place amongst the major economies. The desynchronuation of the economic cycle, which occurred last year as the US economy slowed down while Europe and Japan continued to advance rapidly, is likely to be taken a stage further. Europe, in particular West Germany, is expected to continue to grow quickly in the run-up to the completion of the single EC market in 1992 and as a result of the opening of eastern Europe. Japan and the Asian NICs, adapting with an unprecedented programmed of industrial re-tooling to their new circumstances, are already set on an accelerated growth path. In contrast, the US appears to be in for a period of sluggish growth, as the Fed attempts to press down on inflation without causing a recession. As a result we expect US output growth of only 2 per cent a year over the next few years compared with a sustainable 3 per cent in Germany and 4 per cent in Japan. Despite these differences in growth, US inflation performance lags behind that in Germany and Japan and, partly because of the sue of existing IPD flows, little progress is like& on reducing current account imbalances.     

Adjustment and the measurement of marginal intra-industry trade

Conclusions In this paper, we have set out to do two things: first to investigate the properties of the index of MIIT recently proposed by Hamilton and Kniest; second to evaluate how useful the index is as an input to relating IIT and adjustment. In investigating the former, we found that there were a number of problematic properties of the H-K index. Most notably it censors the data in a non-random way by excluding important information; it inflates the measured MIIT by using nominal rather than real data; and it is unsealed. These properties not only bias the measure upward, they make it inappropriate from the standpoint of evaluating adjustment problems. Our discussion concludes with several suggestions as to how we might identify and measure MIIT more effectively from the standpoint of evaluating the adjustment implications of trade expansion.