Temperance and economic assumptions

The preceding arguments illustrate the inability to adeguately account for the notion of temperance through mainstream contemporary economics. They also bring to light additional anomalies concerning other intangible virtues, e.g., truth, beauty, and knowledge. However, the problems associated with discounting such concepts do not negate the importance of material concerns. Just as people must crawl before they walk, so must they be able to eat before they can think. Before human beings attempt to exercise virtuous qualities in their daily lives, they must first satisfy some level of the basic needs for survival. Without realizing this necessary condition, the search for virtues, particularly temperance, is meaningless.     

Competitive auctions

We study a class of single-round, sealed-bid auctions for an item in unlimited supply, such as a digital good. We introduce the notion of competitive auctions. A competitive auction is truthful (i.e. encourages bidders to bid their true valuations) and on all inputs yields profit that is within a constant factor of the profit of the optimal single sale price. We justify the use of optimal single price profit as a benchmark for evaluating a competitive auctions profit. We exhibit several randomized competitive auctions and show that there is no symmetric deterministic competitive auction. Our results extend to bounded supply markets, for which we also give competitive auctions.     

The Impact of the European Union Insurance Directives on Insurance Company Stocks

This article examines the impact of the passage of the Second and Third Life and Non‐Life European Insurance Directives on insurance firms located in 14 European Union countries, Norway, and Switzerland. The third directives have a wealth effect on the European insurance market, while the second directives do not. The Third Life Directive resulted in a wealth increase for the European insurance market, while the Third Non‐Life Directive had a modest negative wealth effect. The wealth effects differ at both the country and firm level. The directives have differential impacts on firms depending on the firms’ characteristics and those of the market they operated in prior to the directives. Regression results indicate that the second directives have impacted firms in protected markets negatively, especially those with higher debt and higher returns on assets. At the time of the third directives, insurance firms benefited, even those in previously protected markets, indicating that firms may have positioned themselves in preparation for the liberalization of the laws.