Are property rights enough?Re‐evaluating a big‐bang claim1

We investigate the claim made by proponents of the big‐bang strategy that the establishment of property rights in an economy in transition creates its own demand for the enforcement of laws to protect those rights. Our model contains a government engaging in activities to accomplish objectives that depend on public support for the enforcement of the rule of law and agents who interpret the level of activities of the government as indications of the government's intent to enforce the rule of law. Agents, using the level of government activities as an input to their decisions, choose whether to support the government's objectives. We establish conditions under which the level of activities chosen by the government maximizes its benefits, and simultaneously induces the constituency to support enforcement of the rule of law. These conditions provide a basis for the argument for the implementation of the big‐bang policy. When these conditions do not hold, however, we show that the level of activities that maximizes the government's benefits may have only a minor impact on support for the enforcement of the rule of law. Two characteristics play an important role in these conditions: the initial level of crime and the types of activities the government chooses to undertake. We present examples showing that the initial level of crime has the more dramatic effect on subsequent support for the rule of law.     

Bond immunization for additive interest rate shocks

This paper explores bond immunization for additive term structure models. This class of term structures contains many models that are commonly used in the duration and immunization literature. We establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for immunization and prove the existence of a bond portfolio that satisfies the immunization condition. Based upon the immunization condition, we develop a general definition of duration that applies to any additives term structure model.     

The characteristics of takeover targets q and other measures

This study attempts to assess differences in the financial characteristics of target and non-target firms using logit analysis and a case-control methodology in which control groups are matched by size or industry. The results indicate that unregulated non-financial target firms are characterized by low $\text{q}$ ratios (market/replacement values) and to a lesser extent high current financial liquidity. Measures of financial leverage were not found to be significant.     

A Model of Declining Standards

This paper presents a model in which relative standing determines standards. There are three kinds of agents in the model: candidates who wish to pass a test, members of the elite who have passed the test, and the judge who decides who passes. In order to pass, a candidate's performance must be at least as good as the performance of a representative member of the elite. Without perturbations in the underlying data, the model predicts that standards will not change. Perturbations in the preferences used to judge candidates lead to a reduction in standards.     

The limits to IPR standardization policies as evidenced by strategic patenting in UMTS

The impact of patents and patent royalties are a major concern of standards setting organizations. This study examines the patents filed in the standardization of UMTS, the third-generation mobile phone technology developed under sponsorship of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and others, using a patent policy developed in response to issues faced in the earlier GSM (née Group Special Mobile) standardization. After contrasting firm strategies and policy effectiveness between the GSM and UMTS efforts, the paper reviews the potential impact of potential changes to the ETSI IPR (intellectual property rights) policy.     

The roles of accounting in collective bargaining

In this paper, the roles that accounting information appeared to play in the negotiations between a not-for-profit organization and the association representing its professional employees are described and assessed. Using a case mode of inquiry, and drawing on the industrial relations and recent accounting literature, the paper explores the impact of accounting on both the process and outcome of the negotiations, and concludes by offering some tentative hypotheses on the roles of accounting in collective bargaining.