CAPM对我国封闭式基金定价的实证检验

本文以上证封闭式基金为样本,选取2007年12至2010年11月的月度数据,采用单指数模型、BJS两步法和横截面检验实证分析了我国基金市场对CAPM的适用性。CAPM并不适用于我国基金市场,原因在于基金市场的不成熟以及投资主体投资理念的非理性。同时CAPM条件过于苛刻,在对资本市场进行检验时应谨慎对待。     

An Empirical Re-Examination of the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: UK Evidence

This paper is a study of the Fama and French (1992) analysis in the UK context. Consistent with their findings, our results do not support a positive relationship between beta and average monthly returns. We find that book-to-market equity and market leverage are consistently significant in explaining UK average returns. Contrary to the Fama-French evidence, size has an insignificant effect on average returns. A puzzling negative beta-returns relationship is found in some monthly regressions,and results based on annual data reveal a reversal of betas for the smallest-size portfolios. Some possible explanations are offered for these findings.     

Sentiment-scaled CAPM and market mispricing

This study explores the conditional version of the capital asset pricing model on sentiment to provide a behavioural intuition behind the value premium and market mispricing. We find betas (β) and the market risk premium to vary over time across different sentiment indices and portfolios. More importantly, the state β derived from this sentiment-scaled model provides a behavioural explanation of the value premium and a set of anomalies driven by mispricing. Different from the static β–return relation that gives a flat security market line, we document upward security market lines when plotting portfolio returns against their state βs and portfolios with higher state βs earn higher returns.     

Time-series and cross-sectional momentum in anomaly returns

We find strong evidence of time-series and cross-sectional momentum in the long–short returns of a comprehensive sample of anomalies. Strategies that exploit such persistence deliver significant abnormal returns that are robust to the stock momentum effect, cannot be explained by traditional asset-pricing models, and are more pronounced when arbitrage capital is scarcer or market liquidity is lower. Momentum in anomaly returns dissipates but does not reverse, in the long-run. Our findings are consistent with limits-to-arbitrage and slow-moving capital causing mispricing to persist. Supporting this explanation, we find that both the level and persistence of anomaly returns are positively related to idiosyncratic volatility.     

股指期货的套期保值问题

中国金融市场即将推出股票指数期货。本文吸收和借鉴了国外的研究成果,对股指期货的套期保值问题进行了系统研究,采用方差法和β系数法对风险最小化的套期保值比率进行了充分论证,并结合案例进行了模拟计算。本文根据资本资产定价模型,建立了一元线性回归方程,对流行的β系数法进行了检验和重要修正,对套期保值实践具有重要的指导意义。     

股权结构、不确定性与现金持有异象 ——经验证据及其解读

以中国非金融业上市公司为研究对象,对现金持有量及其影响因素进行统计分析和实证检验,结果表明：在中国上市公司中,高额现金持有现象普遍存在;在职消费和代理成本都与现金持有量显著正相关;股权集中度和股权制衡度都与现金持有量之间存在显著的倒“U”型关系;经营活动不确定性和财务活动不确定性都与现金持有量显著负相关;盈利能力与现金持有量显著正相关;负债融资与现金持有量显著负相关。上述研究发现提供了一些现金持有异象的经验证据,说明中国上市公司的制度环境和治理结构具有一定的特殊性。     

The Role of U.S. Market on International Risk‐Return Tradeoff Relations

We study the intertemporal risk‐return tradeoff relations based on returns from 18 international markets. We find striking new empirical evidence that the inclusion of U.S. market returns significantly changes the estimated risk‐return tradeoff relations in international markets from mostly negative to predominantly positive. Our results are consistent with the lead‐lag effect between U.S. and international markets in the sense of Rapach, Strauss and Zhou.     

Testing the CAPM revisited

This paper re-examines the tests of the Sharpe–Lintner Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The null that the CAPM intercepts are zero is tested for ten size-based stock portfolios and for twenty five book-to-market sorted portfolios using five-year, ten-year and longer sub-periods during 1965–2004. The paper shows that the evidence for rejecting the CAPM on statistical grounds is weaker than the consensus view suggests, and highlights the pitfalls of testing multiple hypotheses with the conventional heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust (HAR) test with asymptotic P-values. The conventional test rejects the null for almost all sub-periods, which is consistent with the evidence in the literature. By contrast, the null is not rejected for most of the sub-periods by the new HAR tests developed by Kiefer et al. (2000), Kiefer and Vogelsang (2005), and Sun et al. (2008).     

国外战略风险管理理论研究综述

战略风险管理研究已成为国外战略学界和风险学界研究的热门之一。文章从战略风险概念的分辨、战略风险构成要素和战略风险度量的角度对国外战略风险管理理论进行了综述,并在此基础上对未来战略风险管理的发展提出展望,对我国战略风险管理理论的研究与实践具有指导意义。