我国诚实信用原则研究现状评析

诚实信用自其产生之日起就倍受人们的关注,近代更被称之为"帝王条款".本文通过对诚实信用原则在私法、民事诉讼法以及与自由裁量权的关系三个部分来对我国诚实信用原则研究现状作一评析,认为,诚实信用原则已经超出了其原本狭窄的适用范围,成为了法律与伦理的综合原则,具有了私法与公法适用之共通性,应与正义衡平一道,成为规制人们行为的实践性规范.     

从程序正义看我国的司法改革

针对我国司法制度中重实体而轻程序的倾向,在剖析程序正义与实体正义的关系、正当程序与程序正义联系的基础上,从程序正义的角度对我国的司法改革提出了一些设想。     

浅析民主的概念

民主是什么?人们对此有过很多争议。本文从民主概念的由来入手,分析民主的两种基本模式,并论述程序民主与实质民主的区别,以便更好地理解民主的概念。     

外逃资产追回法律机制新探——兼谈我国确立刑事缺席审判的不可行性

在我国签署联合国《反腐败公约》后,学者们主张在我国确立刑事缺席审判制度,以解决在追回外逃资产时公约对生效判决要求的问题。但目前在我国确立刑事缺席审判制度并不可行。我们完全可以在现行法律的框架内通过民事缺席审判来满足公约对生效判决的要求。     

Payoff Assessments without Probabilities: A Simple Dynamic Model of Choice

We develop a model which reflects the tendency of people to simplify the decision problems they face. The decision maker chooses among alternate strategies only on the basis of the payoff she assesses she would obtain from them, and these assessments do not explicitly take into account her subjective judgements regarding the likelihood of alternate states of the world. At each stage, the decision maker chooses the strategy that she assesses to give the highest payoff. She updates her assessments adaptively. We show that such behavior leads to maxmin choices. We also consider the decision maker who experiences shocks. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C7, D8.     

《联合国反腐败公约》中的证据规范问题探析

《联合国反腐败公约》是联合国历史上第一个用于指导反腐败斗争的国际公约,全面规制国际反腐败活动,涉及面非常广泛,既包含实体规范也包含程序规范,比较直接系统地规定了惩治腐败犯罪的相关证据规则。在兼顾各国国内法证据规范及不同诉讼模式的基础上,通过协调和完善国际刑法中的证据规范与证据制度,使证据的种类、证据的收集、保全、质证、证明标准均有创新发展。深入研究反腐败公约,对于完善和发展国内法律规范以及丰富证据法学内容都有重大意义。     

组织公平视角下国有商业银行核心竞争力培育机制研究

现代商业银行的竞争本质上是核心竞争力的竞争。组织公平对国有商业银行核心竞争力的成长具有促进作用,但有待深化和完善。基于二级分行的样本数据,借助结构方程模型,采用经验性研究揭示二级分行组织公平对核心竞争力的微观促进机理,发现优势促进的路径和不足之处,为国有商业银行公平激励机制的设计和实施提供理论借鉴,从而推进核心竞争力培育的进程。     

Global Sourcing Decision‐Making Processes: Politics,Intuition, and Procedural Rationality

Global sourcing (GS) is a firmly established phenomenon in modern business practice that requires specific expertise from different organizational functions, such as purchasing, production, logistics, and research and development to analyze and select sourcing alternatives effectively. In this context, global sourcing decision‐making (GSDM) processes pose major challenges because two dimensions of functional politics, namely goal misalignment and power imbalance across functions, appear to influence procedural rationality in a manner not understood to date. Likewise, intuition also seems to play a role for the procedural rationality of GSDM processes. To elucidate the conditions under which procedural rationality is hampered or enhanced by politics and intuition, we studied five cross‐functional GSDM processes, in front of extant strategic decision‐making literature. We derive formal propositions on how functional politics and intuition influence the procedural rationality and present contingencies for the divergent role of intuition as well as functional politics in GDSM processes. Our research contributes to existing GS literature by providing a theoretical model of important microfoundations of how GSDM processes evolve. The findings also guide managers on how to structure GSDM processes such that GS projects can be conducted in a more rational fashion.