基于期刊杂志发行企业的逆向物流研究

逆向物流是一种正常的商业活动,对许多企业供应链的完整性以及经营效率产生重大影响。文章研究了期刊杂志发行行业逆向物流的现状和影响因素,并为期刊杂志发行企业的逆向物流提供改进措施及对策。     

Citations,journal ranking and multiple authorships reconsidered: evidence from almost one million articles

In this article, we reconsider the investigation by Moosa (2016) using a much larger data set of almost one million articles listed in Research Papers in Economics. This article provides new insights into the effects of co-authorship on citation counts and the correlation between quality of papers and quality of the publishing journal. Our evidence is partially in contrast to the results reported in Moosa (2016). We find a positive correlation between the h-index of a journal and the quality of papers measured in terms of citations. This correlation becomes almost perfect using a nonlinear model. Results from a regression of citation counts on the number of authors show evidence of a positive and significant effect of co-authorship on the quality of a paper when time effects and large sets of top-cited articles are taken into account. The inclusion of time effects and the large data set, that allows to differentiate between top-cited cohorts, adds further insights to the existing literature.     

Evaluating Journal Quality: Beyond “Expert” Journal Assessments in the IS Discipline

Assessing the relative stature of journals devoted to the information systems (IS) discipline is an important issue for IS scholars and those who evaluate them. Even though journal assessment results are often dubiously applied by those making hiring, promotion, and merit decisions, the fact that they are so often a major ingredient in these decisions demands that we understand underlying journal assessment processes. Beyond processes involving the opinions of various “experts,” we here examine how IS journals can be evaluated based on overt behaviors of crowds of IS scholars. These behaviors are revealed preferences, in contrast to stated preferences found in opinions. Two classes of objective journal assessments are studied: impact measures and power measures. Among the former, we find that so-called journal impact factors are problematic, rendering their meaningfulness in evaluating journal stature highly suspect. Another kind of impact measure, the H-index, is found to be a more straightforward way to gauge journal impact. Two power measures for assessing IS journal stature are examined: publishing intensity and publishing breadth. The stature of IS journals according to each of the impact measures and power measures is determined. A comparison of the results shows that a small group of four or five IS journals are repeatedly found at the top across multiple objective assessment approaches. To account for both the consumption and production of IS research, it is suggested that a combined use of impact and power measures be employed in exercises aimed at evaluating relative statures of journals devoted to IS research.     

Investigating Information Systems Research in Canada

This project reports on the state of Information Systems (IS) research in Canada by analyzing research output and impact of Canadian IS scholars appearing in the form of peer‐reviewed journal articles. Specifically, we (a) measured individual productivity and impact, (b) measured institutional productivity and impact, (c) listed journals in which these works have appeared, (d) identified the most influential articles, (e) developed a ranking of IS scholarly journals from a Canadian perspective, and (f) compared the obtained journal ranking with the global IS journal rankings. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the Canadian IS discipline exhibits signs of academic maturity. Copyright © 2011 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

JMS at 50: Trends over Time

We present an analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Management Studies since its inception to assess to what extent JMS has: maintained its leading international ranking; maintained its founding mission as a broad based management journal; and remained a broad based management journal compared to other general management journals. In terms of its impact factor and citations despite reaching a low point in 2001, we find that JMS today ranks higher than it has ever done throughout its 50‐year history. From our content analysis covering the life‐cycle of JMS, we find four areas have been the most frequently represented, although their relative importance varies between decades: Organizational Management/Behaviour, Strategy, Human Resource Management, and General Management, accounting for 67 per cent of articles published over the period. JMS has strengthened its international author distribution through the increase in authors from the EU especially; the period 2000–04 which saw the predominance of UK authors was an anomaly. There are marked differences between type of article and author country of origin. Our comparative analysis of the word networks between the journals JMS, AMJ, ASQ, and HRM shows that over each decade the papers in the first three normally form a single cluster, indicating that the words used in the papers in the different journals are similar, while papers from HRM often form an outlining group. Notably, in the early 2000s papers in JMS form a distinct cluster, with papers from HRM paralleling the anomaly identified in the content analysis. Overall, JMS has regained its distinctiveness as a broad‐based international management journal, not favouring any particular theoretical or empirical approach.     

高职院校学报发展的几点思考

近几年,高职院校学报在高校学报的舞台上扮演着越来越重要的角色。但由于各种原因,高职院校学报总体办刊水平和质量还不太高,有待进一步发展。从工作实际出发,从宏观、中观、微观三个层面对高职院校学报定位、编辑与各方面的关系、具体编校工作等几个方面进行探讨,提出高职院校学报发展的几点思考。     

预防沥青路面反射裂缝施工中应力吸收层的分析与运用

针对沥青路面裂缝处治的问题,目前还没有非常有效的方法,但是可以在裂缝未出现前就采取预防措施,推迟裂缝的产生,以延长沥青路面的使用寿命,主要结合近年来的工作情况介绍橡胶沥青应力吸收层SAMI和高弹性改性沥青应力吸收层SAWFTL在预防沥青路面反射裂缝中的应用。     

学报数字出版与新媒体传播研究

数字技术与新媒体技术的迅猛发展，为我国学报出版事业的发展带来了新的契机。作为集中反映和承载学术研究成果的学报，其数字出版技术与新媒体传播技术的运用取得了长足的进步，但发展不平衡、不全面和不均等的现象仍然存在。学报从业者应从多层次、多角度和全方位深刻认识和体会数字出版与新媒体传播的迫切性与重要性，着力在坚持正确的舆论导向、做大做强、突出特色以及传统与现代的结合上下功夫。可持续与无止境是学报数字出版与新媒体传播在未来发展的方向。     

高职院校科技开发创新研究——兼谈高职学报的功能定位

自主创新能力已经成为当代国家、地区、企业和高校发展的第一竞争力。高职院校正处在加快发展的关键时期,必须坚定不移地实施科教兴国战略,不断增强科技创新意识,提高科技创新能力,努力培育竞争优势,这样才能实现高职院校又好又快发展的目标。应当深入研究高职科技开发创新工作的现状,构建具有高职院校特色的以应用研究和技术开发为主体的创新体系。高职学报作为综合性学术刊物,具有很强的应用性,这也就形成了高职学报明确的功能定位。在高职院校科技开发创新中,学报理应发挥自己的作用。     

国家示范性高职院校学报办刊的困境与对策

从稿源的内向性、栏目设置、传统管理方式等方面分析了目前高职院校学报办刊模式的现状,结合国家示范性高职院校建设的内涵,从理念、管理机制和编辑策划等方面提出改进高职院校学报办刊模式的思考。