强化政府引导服务功能 提高企业整体创新能力

怀化是一个欠发达的山区,要发展、壮大民营经济,提升民营科技企业整体创新能力,必须注重发挥科技部门职能作用,强化政府引导服务功能。     

企业技术创新的新趋势——合作创新

文章从技术发展的特征,现代企业生产方式的变革,全球化经济发展趋势,论证了合作创新正成为企业技术创新的新趋势,分析了合作创新的优势。提出了我国企业发展合作创新的策略。     

体系创新与路径选择

在经过“ISO9000质量体系认证热”之后,国内不少获证组织苦于所建体系运作效率低下而陷于迷茫之中。本文针对我国认证发展状况及所存在的问题,指出企业质量管理体系面临着创新的紧迫任务,进而从体系运行机制和文件生态学的视角,提出可供选择的路径。     

通过制度创新促进企业提高自主创新能力

在经济全球化发展日益加快的今天,提高企业技术创新能力成为企业增加竞争力的关键。制度创新可以推动技术创新从而提高企业技术创新能力。     

少数民族地区中小企业可持续发展问题及对策

少数民族地区中小企业发展过程中面临着交通不发达与信息化水平较低、政府支持力度不够、融资难、人力资源匮乏、核心竞争力不强、缺乏持续创新能力等问题,这些问题的存在阻碍着少数民族地区中小企业的可持续发展。文章在分析以上问题的基础上,提出了促进少数民族地区中小企业可持续发展的对策和建议。     

新环保法实施增大了企业的技术创新投入吗？——基于PSM-DID方法的研究

以2012—2017年A股上市公司为样本,借助双重差分倾向得分匹配法（PSM-DID）研究了新环保法实施这一外生性事件对企业技术创新投入的影响。结果显示,新环保法实施后受影响企业的技术创新投入有所增加,但结果并不显著。进一步探究其原因,发现除新环保法影响可能存在的时滞性特征以外,企业并没有在新环保法实施环境下对企业的资本结构、治理结构和激励方案等影响企业技术创新的重大方面做出及时调整,导致环保法的强制性作用无法快速、有效地影响企业的技术创新。     

相关多样性对企业创新的非线性影响——基于上市公司的PSTR实证研究

依据雅各布外部性理论探究相关多样性对企业创新的影响，基于2007-2013年上市公司数据，运用PSTR模型实证检验相关多样性对企业创新的非线性影响。研究发现：相关多样性对企业创新有正向作用；随着研发投入的不断增加，相关多样性对企业创新产生非线性影响；企业所有制性质不同，相关多样性对企业创新的非线性影响也不相同；随着研发投入的不断增加且突破某一临界值，在更高的研发投入诱导下，中、西部地区相关多样性对辖区企业创新产生更为强烈的正向作用。     

Inter‐firm R&D collaborations and green innovation value: The role of family firms' involvement and the moderating effects of proximity dimensions

The present paper investigates the relationship between the involvement of family firms in R&D collaborations aimed at developing green solutions and the value of resulting innovations. To dig into this relationship, the moderating effects of two proximity dimensions (i.e., geographical distance and technological relatedness) are also assessed. Analyses are based on a sample of 156 joint patents classified into the “Alternative energy production” field, as defined by the International Patent Classification Green Inventory and successfully filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the period 1997–2010 by publicly listed companies. According to our conjectures, results reveal a positive relationship between the involvement of family firms and green innovation value. Moreover, our findings show that this relationship is hindered when partners are geographically distant or technologically proximate. Eventually, we contribute to the literature on green innovation by unveiling under which conditions inter‐firm R&D collaborations lead to more valuable innovations.     

Can interfirm trust improve firms' cooperation on environmental innovation? The moderating role of environmental hostility

Based on the logic of “trust‐behavior,” we examined the relationship between interfirm cognitive trust, emotional trust, and firms' cooperation on environmental innovation, as well as the moderating role of environmental hostility on the relationship between two dimensions of interfirm trust and cooperation on environmental innovation. Data for the study were collected from 216 firms in China. The results indicated that both interfirm cognitive trust and emotional trust were positively correlated to firms' cooperation on environmental innovation, and the effect of emotional trust on firms' cooperation on environmental innovation was negatively moderated by environmental hostility. Finally, the results were discussed and future directions put forward.     

Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high‐tech innovation in science‐based companies

To achieve sustainable development, companies are increasingly putting an emphasis on the creation and the promotion of environmentally sustainable innovations. Environmentally sustainable innovation often involves a significant shift in a new strategic direction. This paper studies this shift from a dynamic capabilities perspective and aims to identify the microfoundations of science‐based companies' dynamic capabilities for high‐tech environmentally sustainable innovations. It investigates the development of high‐tech environmentally sustainable innovations in two distinctive science‐based companies. To scholars, this study provides an in‐depth process analysis, over time, of how and why microfoundations of dynamic capabilities influence the development of a science‐based company's high‐tech environmentally sustainable innovations. To practitioners in science‐based firms, this process study can function as a frame of reference, enabling the tailoring of a strategy for high‐tech environmentally sustainable innovation.