浅析不同依据下的合理对价——以苏宁电器的股改预案为例

本文探讨了苏宁电器两类股东对价结果分歧严重的原因,归纳概括了股改中最有代表性的两种对价补偿论,在此基础上推导了不同依据下的合理对价,分别计算了苏宁电器相应的合理送股率,据此认为苏宁电器的股改方案不太合理。     

辅导员科研能力培养的思考

辅导员职业地位、职业竞争越来越重要,如何提升辅导员的科研能力,推进辅导员工作职业化,专业化,从事务性迈步到学习性,从实践性迈步到科研性,实行良性转变,促进辅导员队伍健康发展。     

试论用科学发展观反腐败的几个重大问题

科学发展观是我党的最新理论成果,用科学发展观指导反腐败,首先要看能否产生实际效用,其次要看能否站在人民的立场上,再次要看是否能运用统筹兼顾的方法,最后要看能否以可持续发展为基本目标。只有这样,我们才能既取得反腐败的伟大胜利,又能够保持我国社会的稳定和可持续发展,从而顺利实现我国建设富强民主文明和谐的社会主义现代化国家的宏伟目标。     

60年时代主题的重大变革——从“战争”到“和平”的大局统筹

统筹国际与国内两个大局，关乎国家在建设时期“中心任务”的抉择，是建国60年经验总结中不可回避的课题。在十一届三中全会之前与之后，对国际和国内两个大局的不同统筹观（即从“战争格局论”到“和平与发展论”；从“要准备打仗”到“集中力量摘经济建设”的巨大变革），对国际政治、尤其国内的建设格局以及台湾问题的处理方针都产生了极其重大的影响。抚今思昔，在改革大势下。我们全面肯定邓小平的全局统筹观；继往开来，在历史镜鉴中，不等于轻率地否定1978年改革以前毛泽东的大局统筹观。这是历史的否定之否定，是历史的辩证法。     

对新农村建设的理性思考及政策建议

改革开放以来，我国经济建设取得了巨大的成就，人民生活水平日益提高。但我国城乡差距在扩大，农村的发展明显落后于整个经济的发展。党的十六届五中全会指出：“建设社会主义新农村是我国现代化进程中的重大历史任务。”文章分析了新农村建设中的问题，继而提出了政策建议。     

Advertising effects on consumer welfare: Prices paid and liking for brands selected

The effect of advertising on consumer welfare has been the subject of dispute among economists, arising largely from disagreement among scholars regarding the persuasive versus the informative role of advertising. This paper reports two experiments that explore the welfare implications of advertising effects. Experiment 1 shows that the same advertisements can either increase or decrease prices paid for selected brands, depending on the degree to which the choice situation requires brands to be recalled in order to be considered. However, an increase in prices paid caused by advertising does not necessarily imply detrimental effects on consumer welfare. Experiment 2 shows that, even under circumstances in which differentiating advertising leads consumers to select brands with higher average prices, it can provide useful information to consumers that allows them to make purchases that are more in line with their personal tastes than are the choices of consumers not exposed to the advertisements.     

Estimating choice models in data-sparse environments: Taking advantage of perceived similarity

Research suggests that choice models conditioned on correctly identified consideration sets outperform choice models conditioned on the awareness set (Hauser, 1978; Roberts and Lattin, 1991). However, in data-sparse environments, where purchase history information is not available or not relevant, choice models conditioned on the consideration set often yield nonunique or nonsignificant solutions. In these environments, we propose the use of similarity information to improve the performance of choice models. Support for this position is found in an empirical application involving automobiles.     

最低工资标准与劳动者待遇：统一抑或排斥？——基于我国最低工资制度的审慎考量

最低工资标准通常是在市场劳动力过剩时期弱势群体缺乏议价能力且就业困难时发挥效用的兜底机制，从目前我国最低工资标准实施的现状来看，存在着“三个低于”的现象，其困境产生的根源在于中央与地方政府、地方政府与企业、企业与劳动者三组力量的博弈。因此，今后需要我们重新明确最低工资制度的归属，厘清政府与企业责任、积极制定保护社会弱势群体的辅助公共政策，并最终建立主辅得当的最低工资制度。     

关于跆拳道教学方法的思考

跆拳道是很受青少年喜欢的一项体育运动,本文通过对跆拳道特点的分析,给出了几点有利于跆拳道教学的新方法、新思路。     

Planning Discourse versus Land Discourse: The 2009–12 Reforms in Land‐Use Planning Policy and Land Policy in Israel

Land policy and land‐use planning policy are two types of public policy pertaining to space. In general, land‐use planning policy deals with land‐use allocation and property rights, whereas land policy defines the land regime of a society. These differences have shaped a unique discourse for each of these policy types. The purpose of this article is to examine the differences and similarities between the land discourse and the planning discourse by analyzing two public campaigns conducted in Israel against two proposed reforms: the 2009 reform of the Israel Land Administration and the 2010–12 reform of the Planning and Building Law. The findings reveal substantive differences between the two campaigns, manifested in the nature of the leading players, the types of public activities they chose, and most notably in the discourses and the hierarchy of considerations they addressed. The findings raise profound questions regarding universal trends in spatial policy reforms; their influence on the activities of public coalitions and the discourses they adopted; possible future effects of these trends on the differences between the land discourse and the planning discourse; and the impact of these trends on the ability of groups and individuals elsewhere to influence spatial policies (such as planning and land policies).