我国出境旅游相关研究的特点分析

以SCI来源期刊、核心期刊和CSSCI来源期刊1992年至2016年国内发表的与出境旅游有关的共752篇期刊论文进行综合研究。首先,从时间和空间两个维度分析了我国出境旅游的发展特点,其次,归纳了我国出境旅游主要研究内容的六个方面,即出境旅游者、出境旅游市场、出境旅游消费特点、出境旅游的影响因素、出境旅游的贡献、出境旅游政策。最后,指出了我国出境旅游市场发展中存在的主要问题,提出应关注出境旅游新领域重视微观层面进行精细化研究。     

中日科研资助体系对比研究及启示

自2015年来深化科技体制改革进入关键期,再造国家科研资助体系提上日程。从竞争性与非竞争性的二元结构资助体系、产学合作政策两个维度,对比分析中日两国的科研资助体系发现,当前我国还存在非竞争性科研经费比例偏低、竞争性资助计划覆盖领域和人群不够充分、对产学研合作的政策引导尚存不足等问题。因此,还需进一步优化科研资助体系,使其在二元结构、覆盖面等方面更加合理,并强化对产学研合作的政策规范和引导。     

国内外社会资本与旅游研究文献综述

社会资本包含集体社会资本和个体社会资本。通过对Elsevier,Springer link和CNKI等平台上的文献进行梳理发现：在旅游领域,社会资本理论研究主要集中于集体和个体社会资本对旅游发展影响以及旅游对目的地社会资本影响等方面,研究呈现出内容上集中于社会资本对旅游的影响,方法上以案例分析为主的特点,当前仍存在不足,并提出今后研究的趋势,为以旅游创新助力乡村振兴,关注特色小镇发展模式,促进文化旅游可持续等,更好地运用社会资本理论来解释和解决旅游活动中的现象和问题,促进旅游业可持续发展。     

产学研协同创新影响因素及对创新绩效的影响——基于河北省的实证研究

加强产学研协同创新是实现创新驱动发展的关键,协同创新是实现重大科技创新而开展的大跨度整合的创新组织模式。在对河北省产学研合作实证研究的基础上,利用因子分析和回归分析,得出了影响产学研协同创新的四大因素：平台支撑、协同机制、协同能力、合作关系,并探索出不同因素对协同创新绩效的影响程度。     

增值税转型对四川省经济发展影响的实证研究

增值税转型将对财政收入和投资带来巨大影响,从而影响地区经济的发展。本文以四川省的经济数据为基础,结合东北地区增值税转型试点的具体经验,对增值税转型引起的四川省财政减收做出静态测算,分析其对投资的影响情况,并提出相应政策建议。     

跨国经营企业公司治理结构评价及实证研究

一个企业若要在激烈的国际竞争中立于不败之地,完善的公司治理结构是不可或缺的。文章运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法构建了跨国经营企业公司治理模式评价体系,并进行实证研究。解决因跨国经营所面临的复杂环境而带来的公司治理问题,已经成为管理学界和企业界普遍关注的焦点。     

农村合作医疗制度研究综述

新型农村合作医疗制度(以下简称"新农合")建设是关系到农村医疗卫生保障可持续发展的重大问题,文章简要回顾了试点以来新农合制度建设理论研究及实践的进展,归纳了理论界在新农合制度建设的必要性研究、新农合制度的现状及存的问题、农民参合意愿影响因素研究、新农合制度建设的路径研究和农村合作医疗制度建设的国际经验研究等五个方面的研究进展,并对这些研究做了简要的评述,指出农民参合意愿是新农合制度可持续发展的关键,也是新农合制度效率的最好反映。     

基因组方法在虚拟企业组织优化中的应用研究

文章从影响虚拟企业组织设计的权变因素的角度,分析了虚拟企业组织结构设计的特点,并从理论上论证了基因组方法在虚拟企业组织优化设计过程中的适用性。结合组织设计流程,将基因组方法在以特许经营为特征的虚拟企业——美特斯.邦威中进行了试应用,以说明基因组方法在虚拟企业组织优化应用中的有效性。     

Transdisciplinarity in land use science – A review of concepts,empirical findings and current practices

In the search for solutions to complex real-world problems, the benefits of transdisciplinary research (TDR) have been widely heralded. Land use science appears to be a designated field for TDR. However, to date, the additional expenses of TDR are accompanied by a so far not proved added value, and empirical findings are claimed to be scarce and dispersed over several disciplines and case studies.We reviewed 299 articles obtained from a structured literature search to (1) investigate the current differences between theory and practice, (2) identify empirical findings, and (3) ascertain the contributions of TDR to promoting sustainable land use management.Our results demonstrate that, in spite of an increasing conceptual consistency in the theoretical discussion of TDR, the implementation of TDR remains a substantial challenge, in part because of the gap between theory and practice. In addition, research on TDR is science and process centred. The benefits of TDR in addressing real-world problems within the field of land use remain unproven.     

Perceived incentives to transdisciplinarity in a Japanese university research center

As a method of investigating complex socially relevant phenomena, transdisciplinary research (TDR) is gaining increasing centrality as a model of knowledge production. However, it is being discouraged by a scientific reward system based on disciplinary logic. The disincentive is even stronger for junior scholars who should be developing the capabilities necessary for achieving long-term scientific excellence.Building on theories of the coordination of scientific communities and using the case of a research center of Kyoto University investigating the boundary between cell and material sciences, we aim to disentangle the interplay between institutional incentives and intrinsic motivation in the prioritization of TDR over monodisciplinary research.We find that, despite strong interest in TDR among scientists and the center's mission to promote this orientation, only a minority of scientists prioritize this approach. Choice of research strategy is associated with its perceived benefits for idea generation, publication opportunities, intellectual effort required, the costs of team coordination, and satisfaction with organizational resources. Furthermore, the propensity to prioritize TDR drops among scientists beginning their careers.Therefore, we recommend the development of evaluation schemes grounded in activity-based measures and the granting of permanent positions to scientists pursuing TDR.