大股东参与、定增并购主体关联与利益输送

定增并购的出现为追溯探讨定向增发的价值驱动性或利益输送性提供了新证据。本文采用2006—2013年交易数据对定增并购中大股东参与效果及其双主体关联性的经济后果进行实证检验。研究发现,大股东参与行为虽然短期内可能给市场传递涉嫌利益输送的不利讯号,但从长期看却能起到提升内部资本配置效率及公司价值的战略效能,且大股东参与程度越高,其提升效果越显著;进一步观察双主体差异性发现,只有大股东未参与时,定增主体关联度才与利益输送呈现正相关性,而并购主体关联度则以积极效应为主。由此不仅能够自然破除“大股东剥夺假说”,同时还可为定增并购的科学决策以及“全要素”监管模式的架构提供经验支持。     

内控监管能否增进股东利益——基于《通知》发布日和深市A股市场的事件研究法

首先探讨了内控监管对于股东利益的作用途径,分析了内控监管对公司舞弊防范能力和运作效率的影响机制.然后,运用事件研究法,对内控监管的市场反应进行了考察,发现通过内控监管强化内控在总体上不能显著增进股东利益.最后,针对实证结果进行了扩展性的讨论,对内控监管的价值进行了反思并提出了相应的建议.     

Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France

This study examines whether auditors are employed as a monitoring mechanism to mitigate agency problems arising from different types of controlling shareholders. In a context of concentrated ownership and poor investor protection, controlling shareholders can easily expropriate wealth from minority shareholders and profit from private benefits of control. However, this agency conflict has been rarely studied, as the most commonly assumed agency conflict occurs between managers and shareholders. Using an audit fee model derived from Simunic (1980), we study the impact of the nature of controlling shareholders on audit fees in French listed firms. Our results show: (1) a negative relationship between audit fees and government shareholdings; (2) a positive relationship between audit fees and institutional shareholdings; and (3) no relationship between audit fees and family shareholdings. These results illustrate the mixed effects of the nature of ownership on audit fees.     

网络教学环境设计与控制策略研究

教学环境设计是网络教学的基础,控制策略是网络教学的手段,教学质量是网络教学成败的关键。从这三个方面综合研究网络教学是十分重要的课题。本文全面分析了三方面的相互关系,在总结网络教学经验的基础上,提出了具体的可操作措施。     

大股东掠夺行为与国有上市公司治理

与伯利和米恩斯所强调的上市公司面临所有权与经营权分离不同,现代企业的股权相当集中,普遍存在着掌握公司控制权的大股东,由此产生了大股东对中小股东的掠夺行为。这一问题在国有上市公司中普遍存在且相当严重。由于它不同于传统的委托-代理问题,既有的公司治理机制无法有效解决这一问题,因此有必要对其进行完善和补充。     

现金股利政策:法律保护的结果还是法律保护的替代——来自我国上市公司的证据

与LLSV横向研究不同,本文从纵向检验了现金股利法律保护替代模型与结果模型在我国的适用性。首先,纵向分阶段的回归分析和差异检验表明:两模型在我国的适用性呈现出阶段性特征,在法律保护较弱的阶段,法律保护替代模型具有一定的适用性,随着法律保护程度的提高,法律保护结果模型对我国上市公司的现金股利政策更有解释力。其次,检验了我国交叉上市公司与无交叉上市公司现金股利支付率的差异,进一步证明了现金股利法律保护结果模型的适用性。同时,我们也发现一个有趣的问题,现金股利支付率与每股收益显著负相关,与增长机会不具有显著负相关性,说明公司的现金股利政策不是根据盈利状况和增长机会做出的。     

股权制衡、法律保护与控股股东侵占——来自中国A股民营上市公司关联交易的实证分析

控股股东利用关联交易对中小投资者利益进行侵占已经成为公司治理研究中最重要的问题。本文采用中国A股民营上市公司的相关数据,从关联交易规模的角度实证检验了股权制衡因素和外部投资者法律保护对于控股股东侵占的影响。研究结果发现,股权制衡程度越高,控股股东的侵占水平会越低;但是法律保护和股权制衡之间存在替代关系,两者对于控股股东侵占的作用具有一定的重合性,如果同步提高的话,可能会削弱股权制衡对于控股股东侵占的限制作用。     

大股东过度自信行为与公司治理的有效性——基于大股东增持的实证检验

大股东是公司治理的重要参与主体,但大股东行为未必都是理性的。本文以大股东增持为研究的切入点,研究了大股东过度自信行为对公司治理有效性的影响。结果发现,大股东过度自信行为对公司治理有效性有显著的负面影响,而公司外部治理环境的完善对其具有矫正作用。即使剔除政府救市因素对大股东增持的影响,上述研究结论也依然成立。本文认为,在公司治理机制构建中对参与主体非理性因素的考虑,是提高公司治理机制有效性的重要前提。     

Does overcapacity prompt controlling shareholders to play a propping role for listed companies?

A major risk currently facing the Chinese economy is overcapacity, which affects the efficiency of social resource allocation (Xi et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2019). When a company is in crisis, the internal capital market often plays a propping role. This study approached this issue from the perspective of the controlling shareholder and examined whether controlling shareholders provide financial support to enterprises in industries with excess capacity. According to the data for China’s A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2019, companies in industries with excess capacity received more financial support from controlling shareholders compared with those in non-overcapacity industries. Analysis of the mechanism revealed that state-owned enterprises and companies with relatively poor financial status received more financial support from controlling shareholders. This study also examined the economic consequences of such support and found that it is conducive to enhancing enterprise value. This study enriches the literature on overcapacity and internal capital markets by demonstrating that internal capital markets play a propping role for companies facing industry-level crises. This finding has both theoretical value and practical implications related to supply-side reform and capacity reduction.     

How does financial performance affect marketing? Studying the marketing-finance relationship from a dynamic perspective

In this article, the authors provide a dynamic framework for understanding the relationship between marketing and financial performance. They suggest that firms market to financial markets as well as to consumption markets and that some mixture provides superior long-term performance. The authors discuss the potential pitfalls of overemphasizing one market to the detriment of another and then provide a theoretical model of the factors that influence the extent of marketing to financial markets. This is followed by a discussion of implications for theory, practice, and future research. Mitchell J. Lovett (mitchell.lovett@duke.edu) is a Ph.D. student in the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. His current research interests include consumer and seller learning in dynamic environments, competitive and dynamic marketing strategies, and the role of marketing in innovation. Jason B. MacDonald (jmacdona@boisestate.edu) is an associate professor of marketing in the College of Business and Economics at Boise State University. His current research interests include the role of marketing in investor relations and Internet marketing strategy.