储备库数据监控系统人机界面的设计

通过储备仓库实例,介绍了人机界面设计中封面设计、主页设计及界面图形合成的方法与技巧,最后叙述了基于控制系统的人机界面设计原则。     

建筑工程施工的动态安全分析方法

在建筑工程中，施工作业人员的人身安全、施工设备以及各种设施经常受到这些不安全因素的威胁。结合建筑工程的结构、施工作业特点，提出了施工作业安全管理的动态危险性指标，建立了施工作业危险性动态的跟踪分析方法。通过该方法的使用，可以得出施工作业危险度在时间、空间上的变化趋势和规律，找出了影响施工作业危险性指标的主要因素和主要作业工序。分析的结果将为施工安全管理提供客观、实时的动态跟踪信息，提高施工安全管理的目的性和效率。文章最后结合某工程实例，给出了动态安全分析结果以及安全管理建议。     

我国人类工效学标准体系的研究进展

文章分析了我国人类工效学标准体系的主要内容,认为人类工效学标准体系框架应包括技术管理要求、工效设计数据标准和工效评价标准三个层次,重点论述了各层次标准的重．喜研究方向,并提出了几点看法。     

Can leadership branding work in theory and practice to resolve the integration-responsiveness problems facing multinational enterprises?

Leadership branding has been proposed as a new approach for transforming the impact of leaders in organizations by developing a shared leadership identity. There has, however, been little empirical evidence to support the concept. In this paper, we combine new theories of leadership identity construction with dialogue theory to provide a more adequate explanation of why leadership branding might offer multinational enterprises (MNEs) with a useful conceptual framework and a set of practices to help resolve the integration-responsiveness problems they face. We do this by using data from a longitudinal case study of a UK-based MNE. Our findings support the claims that successful identity construction and dialogue help explain the process of leadership branding. They also show that a leadership-structure schema emphasizing shared values and dialogue can assist in resolving integration-responsiveness problems in MNEs, although strong corporate leadership brands are difficult to establish and may not be beneficial in the long term.     

现场执法流程管理系统的人机界面设计

河北检验检疫局现场执法流程管理系统是一套充分利用CIQ 2000系统的数据信息,对CIQ 2000管理系统未关注环节进行流程监控,将检验检疫业务如报检、施检、出证、督办、监督检查、业务分析、在线查看、提出质疑、业务预警等实现网上运行和管理的检验检疫现场执法管理平台。以该系统为研究对象,探讨了人机界面的设计。     

人的可靠性研究应用与进展

人的可靠性研究是系统可靠性研究的一项重要内容.通过研究人的可靠性在应用中的特点,以及导致人为失误的可能情况,提出了提高人的可靠性的基本方法、人的可靠性研究面临的困难和发展趋势.     

Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility

Former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, in his recent book Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (2007), rejects outright the call for increased corporate social responsibility. He believes that social responsibility advocates are wasting resources and efforts on a doomed project. This article suggests that while Reich raises several interesting concerns in his counter-intuitive book, especially about the rise in corporate political power, ultimately his argument is unconvincing. Worse yet, a careful reading suggests that Reich does not contemplate fully what it is he is asking business and society to give up in his call to jettison corporate social responsibility. The notion of corporate social responsibility is itself an extremely, valuable, and hard-won social asset. It is a vehicle for promoting transparency, more nuanced accountability, integrity, better communication, mutually beneficial exchange, and sensible development. In providing a language and vocabulary to critique business from both inside and outside its boundaries, it has becomes a necessary condition for business ethics and modern capitalism. It is especially important in a world of increasing global economics. Nevertheless, it is an extremely fragile asset. Books, like Reich’s Supercapitalism, that dismiss corporate social responsibility in such a facile way, are dangerous and risky in ways that perhaps even the authors themselves are unaware.     

Proximity and Rationalisation: The Limits of a Levinasian Ethics in the Context of Corporate Governance and Regulation

In this article, I explore how the ideas of French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas offer insights into a debate often held today in the field of corporate governance, concerning the relative merits of statutory and voluntary approaches to the regulation of business. The philosophical position outlined by Levinas questions whether any rule-based systematisation of ethical responsibility, either statutory or voluntary, can ever equate to a genuine responsibility for the other person. I reflect on how various authors have adapted Levinas’s philosophy to form a critique of bureaucracy and rule following in business, and the lack of ethical authenticity in corporate codes. However, this article also considers the question of whether a theoretical separation can be made between an ethical responsibility based on sensibility (as is suggested by Levinas) and a rational conceptualisation of how one is required to act. Considering the difficulty of disentangling these notions of ethics, I return to the problem of corporate governance and suggest an approach to stakeholder conflict based on mediation and dialogue, which rules out neither principles of conduct nor an openness of responsibility to the Other.     

The repertory grid to unfold conflicting positions: The case of a stakeholder dialogue on prospects for hydrogen

In this article we share our experience with the application of the repertory grid method, and we demonstrate that this is an appropriate method to scrutinize complex issues and to structure stakeholder dialogues on these issues. Repertory grid originates from construct psychology and has gradually gained ground in other domains as well, such as policy analysis. We used repertory grid to articulate, stakeholders' conceptions of the prospects for hydrogen (H₂). The aim was to highlight not only the mainstream notions of hydrogen but also conceptions that gain less prominence in the hydrogen discourse. Repertory grid was applied in a computerized fashion, with twenty-four stakeholders. During the grid exercise, the stakeholders systematically compared ten different hydrogen visions, which led to a variety of characteristics (‘constructs’) that they used to distinguish and rank the visions. The data were analyzed by means of a frequency analysis and a HOMALS analysis. The analyses demonstrate that repertory grid has been an appropriate method to structure the hydrogen dialogue in three ways: (1) it elicited the full range of concepts that stakeholders used to evaluate hydrogen options; not only the mainstream options and conceptions but also those who are in the margins of the discourse, (2) it identified the most salient hydrogen visions to be explored further in the dialogue, and (3) it helped to form dialogue groups according to these visions. We have also seen that, although repertory grid is well able to prepare for a dialogue process, to make optimal use of the results of repertory grid a genuine deliberation about the marginal positions and conceptions needs to be ensured, even if the powerful actors (who adhere to the mainstream conceptions) are not in favor of this.     

马克思主义哲学研究的若干基础性工作

发展马克思主义哲学、实现哲学创新在理论层面上有一些基础性的工作要做:首先是马克思主义哲学的当代性确证。马克思主义哲学要有效回答当代问题,并且证明自身终结了全部近代形而上学;其次是要在解释学意义上展开同西方哲学、中国传统哲学的对话;第三是存在论基础阐释,揭示马克思实现的哲学革命的伟大意义;第四是发扬批判精神,在现代社会中发挥澄清前提,划定界限的作用。