国外城市蔓延研究进展

在对国外关于"城市蔓延"概念的界定进行综述的基础上,对"城市蔓延"的成本效益、肌理、定量化方法及其对环境的影响进行分析,最后得出对我国城市化的有益启示。     

都市区,都市圈和都市带的概念界定与比较分析

鉴于当前学术界关于大城市地域空间组织若干概念的分歧,针对都市区、都市圈和都市带的概念进行了界定,认为它们分别处于城市化的不同发展阶段,是大城市地域空间组织从简单到复杂、从低级到高级演变的结果。并进一步对都市区、都市圈和都市带在人口规模、空间尺度、社会经济、空间结构等方面的特征进行了比较分析。     

老龄化社会城市老年政策的理念变革

分析中国老龄化社会城市遭遇的各种老年问题,讨论了老龄化城市社会问题的主要特征、发展趋势和解决老龄问题的重要性.回顾国外老龄化进程中的公共服务政策,认为中国城市应对日益加剧的老龄化应进行城市治理理念与公共服务理念的变革.提出政策创新体系基础上的老年社会政策与社会福利增长的对策与建议.     

城乡规划法的价值演进

城乡规划法本质上与时空发展的状况具有耦合性,其范式是不断演进的.2008版城乡规划法是新时空精神的升华,内容框架和价值取向都有较大的创新.该法体现了利益主体的多元化,表现了从"计划"到"市场"的转型,反映了空间上的城乡统筹导向以及策略上的公共政策属性.同时,2008版城乡规划法在规划协作、规划体系等方面所存在的一系列问题,需要在实践中不断地解决和修正.     

西方城市公共服务设施区位研究进展

通过梳理国外公共服务设施区位理论的发展以及近年来研究的新动向,提出了对我国城市公共服务设施区位研究的展望。     

基于熵值法的人居环境质量评价研究——以徐州市为例

在分析城市人居环境系统构成的基础上,构建了人居环境质量评价指标体系,利用熵值法对1991-2005年徐州市区的人居环境质量进行了分析与评价。结果表明,1990年代以来,徐州市区人居环境质量有了较大的提升和改善,并据此就徐州市区城市规划、基础设施建设、生态环境建设和保护等方面,提出了优化人居环境的措施和对策。     

后现代的新城市主义与中国城市规划

讨论了现代主义、后现代主义与新城市主义在城市规划领域的思想核心和主要观点,结合中国城市规划的特点,从城市规划各个方面探讨了新城市主义对中国城市规划的启示,并论述了新城市主义在中国应用的实际与前景.     

探析城市水文地质调查中物探的应用

在有效对地质灾害情况加以检测以及对水文地质参数加以精准的测定方面,工程物探技术显示出强大的优越性,但是地质条件的千变万化对于物探也提出了新的挑战,各种物探方法虽然有着强大的优越性,但是仍不可避免的带有某些局限性。以下,笔者简要就物探在地质灾害以及地下水的勘探等方面的应用加以简要介绍。     

THE PARADOX: Economic Growth that Endangers the Future of Research in Colombia

In this paper I analyse how the gradual reduction of research funds in Colombia can interrupt a key process in the generation of solutions to global urban problems. I draw on a bibliometric analysis to show that research funding flowing from North to South has created collaborations between researchers from North and South that have led to a better and more comprehensive understanding of the challenges facing cities around the world. To conclude, I propose four options to counteract these trends towards lower research funding.     

VERTICAL GEOGRAPHIES,POLYVOCALITY AND THE EVERYDAY IN A DIVIDED CITY

The vertical turn in urban scholarship is a critique of the overly horizontal perspectives used in studying cities in academic research. This article broadens this scholarship by engaging with the ways that horizontal perspectives on urban conditions dominate not only scholarly perspectives but also professional responses to urban change. By drawing on research in the divided city of Mostar in Bosnia and Herzegovina, it argues for a ‘polyvocal’ approach to studying professional responses to urban conditions, one that facilitates a productive juxtaposition of those responses with city dwellers’ everyday engagements with the vertical qualities of the built environment. It also seeks to understand how vertical geographies—here, tall landmarks—in divided cities are seen as part of the complex urban realities of city dwellers in strategies of urban planning and heritage-making related to postwar reconciliation. These findings are compared with ethnographic data about how people make sense of tall landmarks in divided cities and how they experience and interpret them in relation to senses of togetherness and belonging to divided cities. By putting these two lines of research in a dialogue, the ‘polyvocal' approach offers a way to rethink conventional strategies of urban reconciliation and taken-for-granted ways of conceptualizing cities.