创业投资声誉、创业板IPOs初始收益和长期业绩

以我国创业板市场IPOs为样本,引入创业投资声誉对IPO折抑价理论模型进行修正,采用多元回归和两阶段回归方法,实证检验创业投资声誉与创业板IPOs初始收益和长期业绩之间的关系后发现:我国创业板市场中创业投资核证监督作用微弱;创业投资声誉对IPOs初始收益无显著影响;创业投资声誉对IPO后企业长期业绩有显著正效应。本文的研究结论对创投声誉下的创业板发行制度建设有积极作用。     

承销商声誉对企业IPO机会影响的实证研究

以我国2006-2011年期间的企业IPO申请为样本,研究承销商声誉是否更有助于企业得到IPO机会,发现承销商声誉对公司的IPO机会存在显著影响,承销商声誉越高申请IPO的公司越可能通过股票发行审核委员会（简称发审委）审核。即在中国实行核准制的保荐制制度下,承销商声誉对IPO机会发挥着积极作用。     

我国A股市场IPO盈余管理浅析

本文分析了上市公司盈余管理的动因及手段,过度包装会削弱资本市场优化资源配置的功能.严格上市资格审查、严格退市机制、加大外部审计的独立性及执业资格建设力度,加大对违规机构的处罚力度等措施可有效防止公司过度进行首发(IPO)盈余管理.     

不同资本市场发展模式比较及其理论探析

文章首先回顾了与资本市场模式相关的研究文献，然后实证研究不同资本市场模式国家的风险资本市场，从风险投资角度比较不同资本市场模式效率，并对证券市场及其肿机制对风险投资发展的作用机制做出理论解释。     

中国A股IPO发行成本：国有上市公司与非国有上市公司的比较

基于中国证券市场发行上市制度市场化改革的渐进性,A股市场上国有企业和非国有企业的IPO发行成本具有差异性特征。国有企业上市融资的动力更强于非国有企业,但非国有上市公司间接成本受发行市值的影响较小。样本数据证实,发行规模、发行前公司盈利指标、发行首日的二级市场投资者非理性行为以及发行方式和定价机制等变量对不同所有制性质企业IPO发行成本产生影响。证据表明与非国有上市公司比较而言,国有上市公司的间接成本受累计投标询价制度和询价发行方式两个变量的影响程度更大。     

Why Do European Firms Go Public?

We survey chief financial officers (CFOs) from 12 European countries regarding the determinants of going public and exchange listing decisions. Most CFOs identify enhanced visibility and financing for growth as the most important benefits of an IPO, but other motivations for IPOs differ significantly across firms, countries, and legal systems. We find strong support for the IPO theories that emphasise financial and strategic considerations, such as enhanced reputation and credibility, and financial flexibility as a major advantage of an IPO. At the same time, we find moderate support for theories that focus on exit strategy, balance of power with creditors, external monitoring, and merger and acquisition motivations. European CFOs' views on the major benefits of an IPO are generally similar to those of US managers as reported in Brau and Fawcett (2006) , but differ significantly on outside monitoring; outside monitoring is considered a major benefit by European CFOs but a major cost by US CFOs. Our evidence suggests that the decision to go public is a complex one, and cannot be explained by one single theory because firms seek multiple benefits in going public. These motivations are influenced by the firm's ownership structure, size and age as well as by the home country's institutional and regulatory environment.     

How Does Ambiguity Influence IPO Underpricing? The Role of the Signalling Environment

We explore the relationship between ambiguity, or low information clarity, in the IPO prospectus of newly public firms and their underpricing. Consistent with signalling theory, we find that IPO underpricing is low when the prospectus contains less ambiguous information that creates a more reliable signal conveying the quality of the IPO firm. However, the positive association between ambiguity and IPO underpricing is less pronounced when IPO firms display low strategic conformity with other firms in the industry, operate in industries with high valuation heterogeneity, or are medium‐sized. Using a sample of 398 IPOs between 1998 and 2007, our results support these predictions. This study shows the importance of the signalling environment influencing boundedly rational signal recipients interpreting ambiguous signals.