“高危时代”根源探析——资本逻辑的统治

高危时代形成的原因是多方面的,但最根本的是人为因素作用的结果。人口膨胀、科技异化、人性贪婪、发展至上、治理失效以及全球网络等都是重要的危机来源,但却不是高危时代产生的根源。马克思关于资本的研究范式对深入研究当代危机问题的核心和根本仍然具有不可替代的价值。通过对工业文明的反思发现,高危时代的产生在本质上体现为资本对人类实践平衡的根本性破坏,是资本逻辑的演变及其对人类世界统治所导致的必然结果。     

马克思交往理论视角下研究生德育工作探析

关注研究生的发展与完善是研究生德育教育的出发点和归宿。但随着研究生教育的不断发展,研究生人数的不断增加,传统知性的德育教育模式已不再适应时代的要求,我们德育工作者需要转换德育教育思维,挖掘出一个适应新时代研究生德育教育的新视角。马克思交往理论为我们德育教育视角转换提供了坚实的理论依据。     

马克思、恩格斯、列宁论房租

本文主要摘自《资本论》、《马克思恩格斯选集》、《列宁选集》,旨在摘录、总结马克思、恩格斯、列宁等先哲对房租问题的认识,以期为现行房租研究奠定理论基础。     

马克思、恩格斯、列宁论房租

本文主要摘自《资本论》、《马克思恩格斯选集》、《列宁选集》,旨在摘录、总结马克思、恩格斯、列宁等先哲对房租问题的认识,以期为现行房租研究奠定理论基础。     

马克思恩格斯历史唯物主义人权观简论

立足于生产方式制约社会政治生活和精神生活这一唯物史观的基本观点,一方面,马克思恩格斯阐述了人权的历史性、发展性、具体性及阶级性特征;另一方面,马克思恩格斯揭示了人权产生与发展的内在动力机制,即生产力与生产关系的内在矛盾运动。     

马克思经济服务观的伦理内涵

马克思的经济服务观包含着以服务产品的形式满足人的需要,促进一般劳动生产率的发展,以及促进个人的自由全面发展的三重伦理内涵,它揭示出服务是经济价值和精神道德价值的统一,给人们开启了一个理解现代服务观的辩证法视野,并提供了一个解决服务型社会构建中存在的双重基本矛盾关系的理论视域。     

对深化马克思劳动价值论的思考

马克思在对资本主义深刻认知的基础上,批判继承了英国古典政治经济学的理论成果,创立了科学的劳动价值论。文章指出,21世纪我们所面临的劳动环境、劳动关系、劳动内容和劳动形式都发生了巨大变化,这些变化使马克思劳动价值论既面临着挑战,也面临着发展契机。要保证理论的生机,就必须使理论与变化的实践相结合,坚持与时俱进,坚持深化对劳动价值论的认识。     

Problems of Modern Technology

This essay identifies a contradiction between the flourishing interest in the environmental economics of the classical period and a lack of critical parsing of the works of its leading representatives. Its focus is the work of Adam Smith and Thomas Malthus. It offers a critical analysis of their contribution to environmental thought and surveys the work of their contemporary devotees. It scrutinizes Smith's contribution to what Karl Polanyi termed the "economistic fallacy," as well as his defenses of class hierarchy, the "growth imperative" and consumerism. It subjects to critical appraisal Malthus's enthusiasm for private property and the market system, and his opposition to market regulation. While Malthus's principal attraction to ecological economists lies in his having allegedly broadened the scope of economics, and in his narrative of scarcity, this article shows that he, in fact, narrowed the scope of the discipline and conceptualized scarcity in a reified and pseudo-scientific way.     

The physiocrats' concept of labour: A difficulty in Marx's interpretation

Abstract

This article explains the difference between the concept of labour developed by the Physiocrats and Marx. We show that Marx's interpretation based on Turgot is questionable. Whereas Marx bases his ideas on a Lockian definition of labour which puts labour at the origin of value, Quesnay and his disciples develop a mechanistic definition of labour established on Neo-Cartesian foundations. This particular concept of labour then combines with a bio-physical definition of production. The theory of the net product is therefore re-interpreted.