中国金融市场分割问题探源

银行的不良贷款问题得到了学术界的广泛关注,而金融体系中另一个潜在的缺陷,资本的低效率使用问题却没有引起足够的重视。金融理论告诉我们分割的金融市场是阻碍资本自由流动的原因, 本文的目的在于对我国金融市场分割的原因进行探讨。     

SA8000标准的法律渊源研究

我国法学界对SA8000标准的研究焦点主要是如何在此标准的基点上完善我国的劳动法制,而对SA8000标准的法律渊源研究未形成系统的理论。传统法理学说认为法律渊源有二分法和三分法之说,其共同点在于学界比较一致的认为法律渊源较多的是指法的效力渊源。从法的效力渊源角度对SA8000标准的法律渊源进行考察,归纳出SA8000标准的直接法律渊源与间接法律渊源,从而对SA8000标准的法律渊源研究形成系统的理论。     

论按劳分配与按生产要素分配的结合

按劳分配与按生产要素分配之间既有差别，也存在共同之处。其差别主要体现在两种分配方式依据的理论以及二背后的所有制和经济体制不同。在我国当前的经济运行过程中，两种分配方式所依托的体制差异已不存在，并且传统的按劳分配所依据的理论在我国当前的体制下并不完全适用，两种分配方式也都承认劳动是人的谋生手段，劳动对劳动拥有所有权。因此，按劳分配与按要素分配之间的差别正在逐步消失，二之间能够相互渗透和兼容。从收入分配的目标来看，只有实行按劳分配与按生产要素分配的有机结合，才能实现高收入水平上的公平。     

What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971-2006

Business-to-business marketing research has a long tradition of using qualitative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management (IMM) has actively encouraged the use of case methods, resulting in many important theoretical advances in the field. However, debate still rages over what constitutes “good case research”. This article addresses this issue from a positivist standpoint. We examine the how authors address issues of quality in the 105 qualitative case studies published in IMM between 1971 and 2006. Four periods were identified: 1971-1979, 1980-1989, 1990-1999, and 2000-2006. Findings demonstrate that, from a positivist viewpoint, there has been a steady improvement in how authors addressed issues of research quality in published qualitative case studies. Suggestions for changes in data presentation, reviewer expectations, the IMM reviewer feedback form, and the use of web-based appendices containing data pertinent to reader judgments of research quality are suggested.     

“合六巢”区域旅游资源整合开发研究

区域旅游整合开发是现代旅游业发展的必然趋势。全面整合旅游资源,联合开发出一个特色鲜明、文化深厚、可游性强的区域性旅游圈,对提高区域旅游竞争力,实现旅游经济可持续发展具有重要意义。本文首先分析了"合六巢"区域旅游资源整合可行性的基础上,提出了"合六巢"区域旅游资源整合的具体措施。     

基于DEA方法的广东科技与金融结合效益评价

本文采用数据包络分析方法(DEA)对全国各省、市、自治区金融投入与科技产出结合的效益进行评价,并对DEA测评结果进行深入分析,发现影响广东科技与金融结合效益的主要原因是金融投入的结构与科技产出的阶段不相协调以及金融投入资源的管理效率较低,从而为广东探索科技与金融结合的路径与对策选择提供决策依据。     

我国公共医疗卫生支出绩效分析

近年来,我国卫生总费用的绝对数每年都在上升,但政府预算的公共卫生支出所占比重却逐年减少,与其他国家相比显得总量不足。本文分别从经济、公平、效率三个方面对绩效进行分析,说明我国公共卫生支出的绩效不容乐观,必须重新审视公共卫生支出规模与结构,重新思考应该如何分配有限的资源,提高全民福利水平。     

外资进入和我国企业的生产率：“溢出”抑或“挤出”效应

我国改革和开放是同时推进的，引进了众多外资企业来推动我国经济发展。那么，外资企业的进入是否有助于我国内资企业的成长？本文分析我国工业企业超大样本数据，探讨外资进入的影响，研究我国内资企业的生产率能否向效率前沿收敛。结果发现，我国不同类型的内资企业均存在效率前沿的收敛趋势，内外资企业生产率差距不断缩小。外资进入对我国内资企业的短期影响主要表现为溢出效应，但是对于同行业的其他外资企业呈现挤出效应，特别是其他独资外企。我们进一步发现外资进入的长期影响是挤出效应，但是对于国有企业和民营企业的影响却不尽相同。     

Perceived incentives to transdisciplinarity in a Japanese university research center

As a method of investigating complex socially relevant phenomena, transdisciplinary research (TDR) is gaining increasing centrality as a model of knowledge production. However, it is being discouraged by a scientific reward system based on disciplinary logic. The disincentive is even stronger for junior scholars who should be developing the capabilities necessary for achieving long-term scientific excellence.Building on theories of the coordination of scientific communities and using the case of a research center of Kyoto University investigating the boundary between cell and material sciences, we aim to disentangle the interplay between institutional incentives and intrinsic motivation in the prioritization of TDR over monodisciplinary research.We find that, despite strong interest in TDR among scientists and the center's mission to promote this orientation, only a minority of scientists prioritize this approach. Choice of research strategy is associated with its perceived benefits for idea generation, publication opportunities, intellectual effort required, the costs of team coordination, and satisfaction with organizational resources. Furthermore, the propensity to prioritize TDR drops among scientists beginning their careers.Therefore, we recommend the development of evaluation schemes grounded in activity-based measures and the granting of permanent positions to scientists pursuing TDR.     

Accounting Research: Where Now?

This paper provides a commentary on the studies of Barth (2015), Dyckman and Zeff (2015), Ohlson (2015), Sunder (2015), and Whittington (2015) as they relate to past, present, and future directions in accounting research.