轴心压力对Y型偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响

偏心支撑钢框架是在支撑钢框架的基础上改进的一种新型抗侧力体系,该体系结合了中心支撑钢框架强度、刚度高和抗弯框架延性、耗能性能好的优点,是适用于高烈度地震区的一种有效的抗侧力结构体系。同时,由于多高层钢框架的广泛应用,其层数不同将会导致柱轴心压力的不同。本文通过应用ANASYS有限元程序对其在不同轴心压力下的受力性能进行分析。     

Do Small Family Firms Outperform Non-family Firms？ A Research Agenda Based on Agency and Stewardship Theories＊

The aim of this study is to examine the effects of family involvement and altruism on agency costs of equity and debt, as well on the performance of small family businesses. To achieve this objective, the authors reviewed the literature on family business. Drawing from agency theory and stewardship theory, the authors also proposed a research model that highlights the links among the variables. In so doing, this paper makes some contributions to the literature in three ways. Firstly, it takes an integrative framework that may help to explain behaviors oriented towards maximizing potential performance within a context in which pro-organizational attitudes co-exist with self-serving motivations. Secondly, it advances the understanding of corporate governance mechanisms in small family businesses, and finally, it deepens the discussion of prior research by advancing a set of propositions based on two theoretical approaches. Thus, the authors believe that a systematic comparison of different contexts provides new insights into small family business governance. The implications and directions for future research are in the last section.     

Market forces and competition in university systems: theoretical reflections and empirical evidence from Italy

This paper deals with the reforming processes in higher education (HE) from centralised systems towards more competitive ones. In particular, I discuss these issues referring to the Italian case, and the market‐like mechanisms introduced in it during 1990s and early 2000s. The focus of the paper is in analysing the effects of the increasing competition on teaching performance of universities. For this purpose, I develop a theoretical model, moving from the framework of yardstick competition (YC), to describe the functioning of a competition model based on comparing performance of institutions. Then, I apply this model using data from the Italian university system. The results suggest that an increasingly competitive environment effectively improves the universities’ performance, which is also influenced by other factors, namely the characteristics of the institutions themselves and of their students, and by the resources available. As the exploratory nature of the study, these findings must be validated through future research.     

企业空白地带考核指标设计

现在的企业处在一个持续变化的竞争环境中,管理者面临着严峻的挑战。众多管理人员为如何提高企业的效率和业绩而绞尽脑汁,他们并不是没有发现问题的存在,而是没能很好地考虑到这些问题对效率的损害以及如何引导员工提高效率。本文对这管理中问题之一的空白地带问题进行探讨,分析其诱因及影响,并提出了一套绩效指标体系。     

基于沃尔评分法的财政资金绩效审计评价指标体系研究

随着财政资金绩效审计的不断深入,构建财政资金绩效审计评价指标体系成为当前财政审计工作的核心。本文采用＂沃尔评分法＂的基本原理对评价指标体系的路径进行了构建,并对指标体系的主要内容从经济性、效率性和效果性三个方面进行了初步研究。     

高管团队兼职行为与企业业绩关系研究

本文以沪深106家高科技上市公司为研究样本,实证考察了企业高管团队成员的蓉职行为与企业绩效之间的相关性.研究发现高管成员的兼职行为与企业业绩之间存在显著的相关关系.高管兼职企业的规模越大、赢利情况越好,越有利于提高本企业的业绩;高管在企业集团外部兼职的企业数量越多越有利于提高本企业的业绩;高管在企业集团内部兼职企业的数量与业绩关系不显著.     

企业人力资本与企业绩效的实证分析

实证研究了我国上市公司企业人力资本与企业绩效的关系,分析了企业人力资本与企业绩效作用的机理。对不同的行业来说,企业人力资本与企业绩效都具有正相关关系;在同一行业内,拥有高人力资本存量的企业的业绩并不一定优于拥有低人力资本存量的企业业绩,不同的行业有不同的表现。     

高管团队内情感冲突、企业家精神与公司成长性绩效关系的实证研究

根据对企业高层管理者访谈和163份有效问卷,重点分析高管团队内情感冲突、高管团队企业家精神和公司成长性绩效间的关系。实证研究发现:高管团队内情感冲突和公司成长性绩效显著负相关,高管团队内情感冲突与高管团队企业家精神显著负相关,高管团队企业家精神与公司成长性绩效显著正相关。并且,高管团队企业家精神在高管团队情感冲突对公司成长性绩效的影响过程中起着中介作用。     

基于BSC的高科技企业技术创新绩效评价研究

针对目前企业技术创新绩效评价方法和体系中存在的缺陷和不足,结合BSC的基本原理,分析了BSC用于评价高科技企业技术创新绩效的优势,从企业的战略角度对技术创新绩效进行评估,构建了基于BSC的高科技企业技术创新绩效评价模型和矩阵,有效地评估了技术创新对整个企业的贡献度。     

“Horses for courses”: A stakeholder approach to the evaluation of GDSSs

Evaluation of the performance of GDSSs has been dominated by an experimental and laboratory based approach. Other writers have argued for evaluation to be based in the “real-world” of decision making teams. The evaluation criteria have tended to ignore many of the issues that would be paramount for some of the stakeholders in the evaluation process. This article seeks to explore the criteria that might be used by a wide variety of stakeholders, including developers, facilitators, clients, key actors, vendors, as well as academics. By drawing together the criteria associated with all of the stakeholders we discover a broader, and possibly more thorough, framework for evaluation. The evaluation of any particular GDSS in relation to other GDSSs can then be seen in the context of contingent weighting applied to each of the criteria where each GDSS is able to be seen in its best light and in relation to its declared aims. This article argues for a more eclectic and contingent approach to the evaluation of GDSSs which will encourage their future development to be clearer about purpose and the boundaries of their use.