基层人民银行应急预案体系建设存在的问题及建议

本文在专题调查的基础上,系统总结反映了人行西安分行辖区应急预案体系建设的总体情况和取得的主要成效,同时从规划论、预案质量、优化机制等五个方面,指出了现有应急预案体系存在的突出问题。针对这些问题,提出了相应的改进建议。     

“危险驾驶”行为不宜独立设罪——对刑法修正案（八）第二十二条的评析

危险驾驶行为有巨大的社会危险性,刑法修正案（八）将飙车、醉酒驾驶等危险驾驶行为纳入刑法打击的范围,迎合了社会公众要求打击此类行为的舆论。但是,单独设立危险驾驶罪有悖刑法谦抑性,会造成刑法规范之间的不协调和实践操作上的困难。通过解释和完善现有刑法规范,完全可以满足对高危驾驶行为进行刑事处罚的需要。因此,在刑法中单设危险驾驶罪没有必要。     

当法国管理理念碰到中国文化——企业中的权威观

本项研究通过对一家法国跨国集团在其中国子公司实施集团管理战略,推行集团管理模式的实践活动进行考察,来试图弄清楚这家法国跨国集团有关权力行使的管理理念和模式,是怎样影响中国员工的行为的。通过质化的跨文化比较研究,探讨中法不同文化下的权威观。最终得出对一种管理文化的研究,不是用那些抽象、绝对意义上的,看似＂普遍＂的理念为之定性、归类,而应该主要考察这些理念是如何在特定的文化背景中被解读,如何在其共同生活和工作的方式中被赋予实际意义的,这样才有助于实现对管理实践的改进的结论。     

我国建设社会主义新农村的理论与实践

1949年新中国成立后,在土地改革和农业社会主义改造完成的基础上,中国共产党加强了对农村工作的领导和建设。十一届三中全会后,随着农村改革实践的深入,农业生产力得到了解放与发展,农村面貌发生了巨大变化,中国共产党适应农村发展变化了的新实际,提出了建设社会主义新农村;并结合我国农村改革发展的不断深化,把建设社会主义新农村推向新的发展阶段,进一步促进了农业发展、农村稳定和农民增收,加速了全面建设小康社会的步伐。     

组织人力资源管理部门设置实证研究——基于北京市的非随机抽样调查

组织人力资源管理部门的重要性虽然日益得到认可,但是否独立设置人力资源管理部门却缺乏实证性研究。通过对调查问卷的分析,发现近80%的组织独立设置了人力资源管理部门。再通过进一步的计量分析,发现一个组织是否独立设置人力资源管理部门与其人员规模和从事人力资源管理工作人数具有顺序效应,并进而构建了人力资源管理部门设置的二值Logistic回归模型     

Care management to improve retail customers' and employees’ satisfaction

In retailing, ongoing management is needed to avoid compromising customer relationships and organizational performance because of consumers' or employees' dysfunctional behavior. This paper contributes to understanding how care management strategies can improve in-store experiences for customers and employees by adapting the Chronic Care Management (CCM) theory to retailing. Across two studies, one on customers (Study 1) and one on retail employees (Study 2) we show that empowerment reduces dysfunctional behavior, enhancing satisfaction. Furthermore, we demonstrate that customers' and employees’ emotional bond with the retailer (i.e., store attachment) moderates the relationship between dysfunctional behavior and satisfaction, buffering dissatisfaction from dysfunctional behavior.     

Mitigating panic buying behavior in the epidemic: An evolutionary game perspective

The panic buying behavior under public health emergencies will lead to many adverse consequences, such as material waste, price fluctuation and uneven distribution of epidemic prevention materials, which will pose a threat to the social stability and economic development. In this paper, we construct a tripartite game model to explore the strategic choices of the public, merchants and the government in order to effectively respond to the panic buying behavior in the epidemic. The results demonstrate that: (1) Eight evolutionary stable strategies emerge in the panic buying events. The worst scenario can be improved by adjusting some relevant parameters. (2) The probability of the public choosing the strategy of “not involving in panic buying” depends on the potential benefits and losses of snapping up, rather than the extent of price rising. (3) The probability of merchants choosing the strategy of “not bid up price” depends on the intangible benefits. (4) The probability of the government choosing the strategy of “active supervision” depends on the supervision costs and government credibility, rather than the amount of fines. In addition, strategic suggestions to mitigate panic buying behavior are put forward from the perspective of each stakeholder.     

When push comes to shove: How coach versus student athlete misconduct affects event attendance intentions

Though onand off-the-field misconduct is common among U.S. college athletic programs, little is known regarding the ramifications that may result. Drawing on social learning theory, the current research suggests consumers intentions (e.g., likelihood of attending a game) differ depending on violator's team role. Across one qualitative and five experimental studies, we demonstrate that consumers' intentions are influenced by violator's team role, such that likelihood of attending a game is lower when a coach (vs. student athlete) misbehaves, an effect driven by evaluation of the academic institution. This effect is robust across both winning and losing records and moderated by perceived fairness of the university's actions toward the violator.