农户借贷行为调查研究

农户虽然是我国经济组织体系中最小的经济单位,但它却是农村资金的主要供给者、农村金融基本的服务对象。所以,研究农户的借贷行为特征及其影响因素不仅能推动农村金融机构改革的深化,而且能为政府制订相关的农业信贷政策提供参考。文章以黑龙江省巴彦县兴隆镇112户农户为样本,对其借贷行为进行了调研,并从正规金融、民间借贷供给和农户自身需求三方面分析了影响农户借贷行为的制约因素,提出相应的建议,从而促进当地农村经济的持续、快速发展。     

产业集群竞争力分析——以辽宁汽车产业集群为例

运用一种研究产业集群竞争力的量化分析工具——GEM模型,构建了辽宁汽车产业集群竞争力评价表,对该集群的各要素进行了竞争力的综合分析。分析结果表明:辽宁汽车产业集群在全国范围内已经有一定的竞争力,但在设施、企业结构、战略和竞争方面得分都低于全国平均水平,已成为制约其进一步发展的瓶颈因素,因而从"基础","企业","市场"方面给出了提升辽宁汽车产业集群竞争力对策建议。     

Is Uniform Money Always Better than Separate Monies?

Previous studies that compare a uniform money with separate monies used models in which money is the only asset and in which individuals hold either zero or one unit of money. Here, the comparison is made using a model in which money coexists with a higher-return asset and in which individuals are permitted to hold richer portfolios of assets. The results show that a general conclusion is not possible. A uniform money has a higher expected utility than do separate monies in many examples. However, when the discount on bonds and uncertainty about the nationality of the trading partner are sufficiently high, then there are examples in which separate monies are better.

Trade Costs,Trade Balances and Current Accounts: An Application of Gravity to Multilateral Trade

In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (NBER Macroeconomics Annual 7777:339–390, 2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Our approach has a number of novel features. First, we focus on the interrelationship between trade costs, the trade account and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Second, we use the gravity model to estimate the effect of trade costs on bilateral trade and, third, we show how bilateral trade can be used to draw inferences about desired trade balances and desired intertemporal trade. Our econometric results provide strong support for the Obstfeld and Rogoff hypothesis and we are also able to reconcile our results with the so-called home bias puzzle.

财产税效率的作用机制考察

仅仅依靠公众从辖区中退出提升财产税效率只有理论上的意义。呼吁是另一种提升效率的手段,它的作用机制需要两个条件:退出的可置信威胁,以及对组织管理者漠视呼吁的行为有一定政治成本。在退出之路可行性不大时,降低呼吁成本,使得下情上达的成本减小,同时增加地方政府官员漠视呼吁的政治成本,把处理公众呼吁的行为方式同地方政府官员的政治前途结合起来,这样才能够使财产税得到现实效率。     

基于ATM的MPLS仿真模型的总体设计

讨论了基于ATM的MPLS仿真模型的总体设计和实现。该设计基于OPNET的模型库基础上完成。实现的模型可以丰富OPNET仿真模型库，可以为使用OPNET进行有关基于ATM的MPLS仿真研究提供了一个途径和基础。     

电子商务专业人才培养模式的探索

本文提出电子商务专业＂工学并行、岗能一体、校企融合＂的人才培养模式,并给出了具体的实施方案和建议。通过人才培养模式的构建,希望建立一个合理的、完善的、高效的人才培养体系,为高职电子商务专业建设和改革提供具有参考意义的人才培养思路。     

市场培育视角下科技协同创新模式的构建与完善

科技创新是创新驱动发展战略的核心,创新驱动发展战略的实施需要先进的科技创新模式支撑。由于目前我国科技创新市场发育还不完善,科技创新成果转化率、原创性以及经济增长效应均较低,尤其是现有科技创新模式忽视创新成果的原创性及转化率,且与国家发展战略的契合度不高,有效科技创新不足成为制约创新驱动发展战略实施的主要因素之一。从科技市场培育角度来看,应基于创新驱动发展战略理念,构建以企业、高校和科研院所、政府为主体的科技协同创新模式,转变创新主体观念和行为,完善创新成果交易市场,强化创新人才培养和管理,为创新驱动发展战略的顺利实施提供充分有力的科技创新支撑。     

The role of corrosive internalisation and denial of responsibility in stabilising inequality in South Africa

ABSTRACT

This paper examines how capabilities inequality is stabilised through its consequences on those at both ends of the distribution. It outlines the development of the balance model, which is argued to help highlight these consequences. Specifically, how adverse environments associated with lack of access to resources and poor treatment can lead to internal consequences which further corrode capabilities. At the same time, denial of this corrosion or its importance is critical for those who benefit from the inequality. To avoid moral constraints being triggered it is important, necessary even, for them to see those who suffer as outside of their moral universe, or their suffering to be in no way associated with their advantage. Corrosion and denial work to stabilise the system. For those in the middle of the distribution, they may work to do so in combination. Appreciating these internalised consequences is key to addressing inequality in South Africa.     

Marx,Sraffa, and Surplus: Observations Prompted by Garegnani (2018)

ABSTRACT

In a posthumously published article, Pierangelo Garegnani (2018. ‘On the Labour Theory of Value in Marx and in the Marxist Tradition.’) depicts Marx’s project in Capital as that of ‘developing systematically the theory of Ricardo and [the] implications of social conflict’ implied by Ricardo’s ‘surplus approach to value and distribution’. This paper argues to the contrary that Marx’s theory of surplus value and exploitation differs from (neo-)Ricardian surplus theory in fundamental ways, and modifies Garegnani’s simple Sraffian model to illustrate the distinctive implications of Marx’s theory.