Ethical dilemmas: Teaching futures in schools

Educational policy is implicitly futures oriented, yet in most instances fails to engage learners with explicit futures tools and concepts at a school level. Futures studies in education, or futures education has the potential to reposition learning as purposeful and mobilizes the lives of participants by connecting the curriculum of schools with the multifaceted futures of learners. This is a complex task within the tensions often existing between: the cultural role of a school, the expectations of a society, the expertise of teachers, and the increasingly diverse needs of learners (Bateman, 2012). It is between the tensions of these things that the ‘ethical’ issues of what is taught, or omitted as content in a classroom and the consequences of these choices are evident.This paper highlights ethical and moral dilemmas, as they were apparent in two futures education projects. In the first study, the teachers discuss the inherent limitations of offering a broader and more futures oriented curriculum. In the second study, teachers reflect upon their students’ anxiety with regards to futures images as they are interrogated within a curriculum study. Each of these studies highlights the ethical challenges that arise, when possible, preferable and probable futures are developed as part of learning in school settings, which are culturally and demographically diverse.Tirri and Husu (2002) highlight the ethical dilemmas, which emerge in classrooms around the world, based on conflicts in values and competing intentions between key stakeholders. In the studies which contribute to this discussion, there is evidence to suggest that futures thinking causes conflict within an individual's perception of how the world should be, or their worldview as a result of futures imagining which goes beyond what is taken for granted, or is an assumed future eventuality. In the same way, Carrington, Deppeler, and Moss (2010) argue that all curriculum choices about what is taught (or not taught) in a classroom reflect an ethical decision made by a teacher, with regards to what is foregrounded for learning and what is omitted.It is crucial to re-examine the role of a school in educating students for their futures, as opposed to educating students with an aim of furthering governmental agendas. More significantly, however, as this paper highlights, it is exploring the boundaries of what is acceptable or unacceptable, appropriate or inappropriate to teach in a classroom, given the changing diversities of schools and education systems throughout the world.     

任务型教学法和传统3P教学在阅读课中的对比

任务型教学法在提高学生独立思考，应用语言表达自己思想和全面看问题方面的确有3P教学所不能及的效果。高职英语阅读教学更需要引入任务型范式来提高其英语应用能力。     

教育管理控制职能中的伦理问题探析

控制是教育管理的一项基本职能,它是指管理者为了保证实际工作与计划一致,有效实现目标而采取的管理活动。教育管理存在于复杂多变的社会环境之中,常常受到不确定因素的影响,干扰管理工作的正常开展,从而影响计划的执行、组织的运转及目标的实现,所以必须对教育管理活动进行有效的控制,以保证管理决策与目标计划得以实现,保证组织持续稳定发展。伦理属性是教育管理的重要属性之一,伦理性的要求自然也贯穿于教育管理控制职能的始终。     

素质教育与应试教育的经济学分析

在现代教育中,作为以卓越为目标追求的学校,将个人素质或学习能力作为招收学生的一个决定性因素.考试是个人素质与学习能力考核的替代性安排,这种制度安排既节约交易费用,同时又产生社会资源浪费.资源浪费的表现形式体现为提高考试分数,而不是在提高素质上加大投入,即应试教育的产生和壮大.学校招生制度的变革能够在一定程度上减少这种浪费.     

边疆民族地区成人大学生思想教育特点及对策

成人大学生作为高校学生队伍中的一个特殊群体,其思想状况如何直接关系到高校思想政治工作的成效,分析他们的思想教育特点及原因,掌握其思想现状并探讨教育对策是高校教育工作者的重要职责.     

论大学生思想道德教育的根本途径

由于社会转型、学校教育的缺陷及家庭影响,当代大学生在思想政治、道德素质、心理素质方面出现一些问题.大学生思想道德教育的根本途径在于回归现实生活,即注重联系现实生活教育、培养道德情感、引导思想道德能力的提高.     

专业英语在高等职业教育中的作用

高等职业技术院校是培养我国专业技术人才的基础。高等职业教育中专业英语教育作为重要的课程,必须加强对其重视的程度。通过高等职业院校专业英语教育的不断加强,可以提高学生的英语实践水平,为后期的专业学习打下基础,为日后的文献检索、查询打下基础。     

基于就业导向的高职院校人才培养模式改革

培养适合经济社会炭展需要的应用型的各种技术人才是中国高等职业教育的根本目的。现阶段中国高职院校人才培养模式存在定位不清、专业结构不合理、缺乏特色,与市场需求脱节的问题。中国高职院校人才培养模式需进一步强化就业导向,深化体制改革,完善就业体系与师资结构,提升办学特色与质量,紧密结合经济社会发展实际设计专业培养市场需要人才。     

审美教育与大学生创新能力的培养

从美与创新的关系看,美具有创新的特征;从内涵的角度来看,美育与创新能力的培养具有一致性;从功能的角度来看,美育与创新能力的培养具有统一性;美育在人才培养的过程中,对大学生创新能力的培养具有重要作用。     

论新形势下党加强理想信念教育的战略举措

加强理想信念教育,历来是中国共产党的优良传统。但在新形势下,社会活力增强,社会的结构、组织形式、利益格局也都发生了深刻变化,人们思想活动的独立性、选择性、多变性、差异性明显增强。由此理想信念教育的重要性增强,其教育的难度增加。对此,中国共产党必须给予高度重视,并要深入思考和回答事关社会主义兴衰成败的重大理论和实践问题,重视加强对青少年和大学生的理想信念教育,特别注重对党员领导干部的理想信念教育,用中国特色社会主义共同理想凝聚全社会的力量。