浅议旅游院校产学研相结合

产学研相结合是现代高等教育发展的一个重要趋势,是提高人才培养质量和科研水平以及增强学校办学能力的有效措施。旅游院校产学研三结合的形式应由市场经济环境的客观需要来决定,可以考虑多种形式。同时,产学研三结合还应注意三个方面的问题     

论高校科研项目成果转化机制的创新

高校作为高层次,高素质人才的集聚地,承担着太量的基础研究、应用研究和开发研究任务,创造出大量的科技成果。文章结合高校科研管理工作的现状与特点,从机制创新的层面出发,探讨了推进高校科研成果转化的方式与渠道。     

信息文明时代的网络清淤探究

21世纪将是信息文明的时代,网络技术发展,使信息的传递、开发、利用、更新变得更快、更科学,超过了人类社会文明进程的任何历史时期和阶段。但是,与生俱来的网络淤泥,即不良信息、电脑黑客、网络犯罪等,会妨碍有效信息传递的畅通无阻.因此,网络清淤的立法和工作,势必成为各国政府、企业、社会共同面对的一个崭新的课题。     

基于"制度荒"和"权益荒"的"民工荒"研究

由户籍制度和社会保障制度等多种制度上的欠缺形成的"制度荒"是导致"民工荒"的根本原因,而由农民工合法权益的现实缺失形成的"权益荒"则是出现"民工荒"的直接原因.要深化户籍制度改革,促进城乡融合;完善农民工社会保障体系,确保农民工权益;加强劳动执法监督力度,并弥补《劳动法》相关规定;摆正政府地位,实现政府的有效监管;设立社会中间层,缓和农民工与政府和市场之间的矛盾.     

Were In-Process Research and Development Charges Too Aggressive?

Abstract:  Prior research documents that US firms write off large in-process research and development charges (IPRD) for acquisitions, possibly overstating the current period expense to inflate future earnings. Consequently, in 1998, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began scrutinizing IPRD charges. We use pre-acquisition R&D expenses of 144 target firms as a benchmark for assessing whether IPRD charges are appropriate. Overall, the results suggest that most firms during our sample period were not overly aggressive in expensing IPRD–especially for acquisitions subsequent to the SEC's scrutiny. The results also indicate that the SEC's intervention reduced the frequency of overstated IPRD charges.     

物流在制造业中的嵌入性研究

随着经济的发展物流业在现代经济中扮演着愈来愈重要的角色。针对物流企业在制造企业中的结构性嵌入和关系性嵌入表征展开分析,基于宏观与微观视角提出了物流在制造业中的嵌入理论框架,以厘清物流在制造业中的嵌入机制的形成机理,为进一步激活物流与制造业的产业联动发展提供有益思路。     

科研开发与经济增长——兼论科研开发的溢出效应

经济划分为科研部门和非科研部门，科研开发对经济增长的作用及科研对非科研部门具有外溢效应。1999-2003年30个省市自治区的面板数据表明，科研开发对经济增长具有较大的拉动作用，同时科研开发部门对其他部门的外溢作用明显为正。     

科研院所科研经费全过程管理模式研究

科研经费是支撑科研活动的重要物质保障,随着科技事业的不断发展,科研经费规模也持续扩大,但由于科研院所的经费管理方式与快速增长的科研经费不完全适应,使得科研经费使用中存在的问题逐渐显现出来。针对经费管理的预算、使用和结算等环节存在的问题,提出以制度为管理底线,以考核为规范上限,各部门人员沟通协助的全过程经费管理模式,以期为强化科研经费管理、规范经费使用提供借鉴。     

Bibliometric and Scientometric analysis on CSR practices in the banking sector

This paper provides a bibliometric and Scientometric analysis of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) in banking sector. Our study analyzes 551 articles from the Scopus database to find out the relationship between CSR and banking. A bibliometric method was used to visualize the results using R-studio and VOS viewer software. The Scientometric analysis was conducted to determine the findings and mappings of the research themes, directions of current and future research, impact, co-occurrence, co-citations and impact and collaboration trends. We explore how CSR literature has evolved over the years in the banking sector between 1993 and 2021. We find that publication in the CSR and banking domain has increased significantly during 2017 and 2021. Social aspects, board of directors, CSR, environment, competitions, Islamic banking, sustainability, disclosure, ethics, legitimacy theory, sustainable banking, loyalty, and brand equity are the popular research trends and collaboration trends identified. We also provide further scope of the study based on the extensive review of the past literature. Our findings may provide help to future researchers, bankers, and regulators in understanding the current trends and future research progression in the CSR and banking sector.     

Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability

The normative implications of participatory research imply ongoing social learning that ought to lead to personal and institutional transformation. Sustainability science also requires reflexive scientific practice in order to enable the co-generation of solutions that take account of uncertainty and multiple forms of knowledge. However, there is little published peer-reviewed material on how to assess to what degree the rhetoric regarding the benefits of participatory research are achieved in practice, particularly with regard to participatory research for sustainability. This paper outlines how linking the rationales for participatory research and for sustainability science to the principles of evaluation can deliver a conceptually coherent evaluation framework for assessment. The approach for evaluating participatory research in this context consists of framing the evaluation, i.e., setting boundaries on the subject within its social, political, environmental and institutional context and selecting appropriate criteria, methods and data sources. The application of the framework, using a summative evaluation of participatory research for sustainability in north-east Australia, illustrates its strengths and weaknesses, concluding with a consideration of its applicability to further participatory sustainability science.