An assessment on the quality of China’s preliminary data of quarterly GDP announcements

This article examines the quality of China’s preliminary announcements of the quarterly GDP. We modify the tests for unbiasedness and efficiency by incorporating the Fourier approximation to capture the effect of the state of the economy, and employing the Kiefer, Vogelsang and Bunzel (KVB) approach, developed by KVB in 2000 to reconstruct the tests to improve the finite sample properties. The results show that: (1) there is no enough evidence to support that the preliminary and first revised data are unbiased and efficient; (2) there exist systematic errors related to the state of the economy, and hence information about the state of the economy was not incorporated into the GDP data. Furthermore, we find that there is a possibility that these systematic errors associated with the stages of the business cycle may offset each other, and there is also a possibility that there exist offsetting errors in the underlying components of GDP.     

Spatial statistical modelling of insurance risk: a spatial epidemiological approach to car insurance

Spatial models, such as the Besag, York and Mollie (BYM) model, have long been used in epidemiology and disease mapping. A common research question in these subjects is modelling the number of disease events per region; here the BYM models provides a holistic framework for both covariates and dependencies between regions. We use these tools to assess the relative insurance risk associated with the policyholders geographical location. A Bayesian modelling approach is presented and an elastic net is used to reduce the large number of possible geographic covariates. The final inference is performed using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation. The model is applied to car insurance data from If P&C Insurance together with spatially referenced covariate data of high resolution, provided by Insightone. The entire analysis is performed using freely available R-packages. Including spatial dependence when modelling the number of claims significantly improves on the result obtained using ordinary generalised linear models. However, the support for adding a spatial component to the model for claims cost is weaker.     

快速校正天波雷达电离层相位污染的改进方法

时变的电离层会对天波超视距雷达(OTHR)回波信号相位进行调制,产生相位污染,导致回波谱展宽。最大似然估计(MLE)法具有比相位梯度法更佳的污染校正效果,但计算量非常大。通过引入投影近似子空间跟踪法,提出了一种改进的MLE方法。改进方法采用递归手段估计最大特征值对应的特征向量,避免了特征值分解过程,能够显著降低计算量,污染校正效果与MLE法相当。理论分析与仿真对比表明改进方法普适性强,计算量只有MLE法的万分之一,更适合工程实现。     

Learning in linear models with expectational leads

Models with expectational leads typically admit multiple rational expectations solutions. Based on the ordinary least-squares algorithm, this paper provides an adaptive learning scheme which allows a forecasting agent to select a particular solution on economic grounds. Conditions are given under which this scheme converges to rational expectations solutions globally for all initial conditions. We strengthen convergence results in relaxing standard assumptions and in providing conditions ensuring algorithm convergence which are easier to verify and to interpret than those previously known.     

Bootstrap unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency

We apply bootstrap methodology to unit root tests for dependent panels with N cross-sectional units and T time series observations. More specifically, we let each panel be driven by a general linear process which may be different across cross-sectional units, and approximate it by a finite order autoregressive integrated process of order increasing with T. As we allow the dependency among the innovations generating the individual series, we construct our unit root tests from the estimation of the system of the entire N cross-sectional units. The limit distributions of the tests are derived by passing T to infinity, with N fixed. We then apply bootstrap method to the approximated autoregressions to obtain critical values for the panel unit root tests, and establish the asymptotic validity of such bootstrap panel unit root tests under general conditions. The proposed bootstrap tests are indeed quite general covering a wide class of panel models. They in particular allow for very general dynamic structures which may vary across individual units, and more importantly for the presence of arbitrary cross-sectional dependency. The finite sample performance of the bootstrap tests is examined via simulations, and compared to that of commonly used panel unit root tests. We find that our bootstrap tests perform relatively well, especially when N is small.     

Smoothing the payoff for efficient computation of Basket option prices

We consider the problem of pricing basket options in a multivariate Black–Scholes or Variance-Gamma model. From a numerical point of view, pricing such options corresponds to moderate and high-dimensional numerical integration problems with non-smooth integrands. Due to this lack of regularity, higher order numerical integration techniques may not be directly available, requiring the use of methods like Monte Carlo specifically designed to work for non-regular problems. We propose to use the inherent smoothing property of the density of the underlying in the above models to mollify the payoff function by means of an exact conditional expectation. The resulting conditional expectation is unbiased and yields a smooth integrand, which is amenable to the efficient use of adaptive sparse-grid cubature. Numerical examples indicate that the high-order method may perform orders of magnitude faster than Monte Carlo or Quasi Monte Carlo methods in dimensions up to 35.     

Totally positive regression: E-optimal designs

E-optimality of approximate designs in linear regression models is paired with a dual problem of nonlinear Chebyshev approximation. When the regression functions form a totally positive system, then the information matrices of designs for subparameters turn out to be “almost” totally positive, a property which allows to solve the nonlinear Chebyshev problem. Thereby we obtain explicit formulae for E-optimal designs in terms of equi-oscillating generalized polynomials. The considerations unify and generalize known results on E-optimality for particular regression setups.     

How accurate is the integrated vendor–buyer continuous model?

The classic single-item, deterministic-demand, integrated vendor–buyer model is revisited. The decision problem may also be viewed as that of one centralized firm, dealing with a two-level EOQ-like supply chain with finite production rates. It is sought to optimize the production lot-size and the integral number of its shipments, in equal batches, from the vendor to the buyer. While the problem calls for discrete optimization techniques, we introduced a continuous model where one can take derivatives with respect to both variables. In this short paper, we establish a 98.5% lower bound on the accuracy of this continuous model.