加强理工科大学生的人文素质教育

人文素质是理工科大学生综合素质的重要组成部分,要转变教育观念,提高教师人文素质,完善教学体 系,弘扬传统文化,加强艺术教育,营造有人文精神的校园文化,以切实提高理工科大学生的人文素质。     

审计项目后评价指标体系构建研究

目前，我国审计机关对审计项目尚缺少一套科学、量化的后评价指标体系。本文从实施审计项目后评价的意义、系统要素、评价的主要内容及后评价体系构建四个方面加以阐述。在构建评价指标体系时采用定量和定性相结合的评价方法，同时兼顾可行性和可操作性。     

简论软件项目管理中的关系管理

本文从软件项目管理出发,列举了软件项目管理的主要角色,分析了软件项目管理中的五种重要关系,以及处理和协调这五种关系的要点。     

工程项目T、Q、C决策优化方法研究

工期(T)、质量(Q)和成本(C)是项目建设中,决策者最为关注的三个目标,它们在不同的工程项目中表现出不同的决策要求。本文研究了T、Q、C三者发生不同变化时的决策情形,并给出了相应的决策优化思路和方法,为项目决策人提供了一定的决策参考依据。     

油田开发项目经济寿命期的确定方法

采用技术经济学中的盈亏平衡原理，研究了油田开发项目的技术经济特点，对原油成本进行分类与预测，对油田开发项目经济寿命期的确定方法进行了初步研究。     

Monoculture versus diversity in competition economics

Economics rightfully represents the major basis for competitionpolicy. Next to generating knowledge about competition and itswelfare effects, the currently popular ‘more-economicapproach’ is charged with a number of additional hopesand expectations. While this article highlights the benefitsof economics-based competition policy, it takes a cautious stancetowards excessive expectations, in particular regarding theidea that a monocultural, ‘unified’ competitiontheory as an exact, objective and unerring scientific approachto antitrust could make normative assessment and generalisationssuperfluous. Diversity in competition economics is advocatedin two ways. First, competition economics is empirically characterisedby a considerable pluralism of theories and policy paradigms.Second, it is demonstrated that this diversity of theories istheoretically beneficial for future scientific progress. Asno ultimate competition theory can ever be expected., the ‘more-economicapproach’ must be extended in order to embrace diversity.     

建筑企业系统内部工程整体分包行为研究

论文主要针对我国的大型建筑企业或者企业集团在承包的项目中出现的内部分包行为进行分析，对各种具体行为进行了归纳与定性。文中分析了其产生的背景与原因，以及可能导致的问题。希望能够有助于企业正确认识这种行为及其后果，及时调整企业经营策略。同时有助于有关主管部门的调控和管理。     

项目管理中的平衡决策研究

许多项目决策为多目标决策,涉及多种资源、多个行为主体以及受多种因素影响,大量的决策问题都表现为一种寻求各方均衡协调。本文研究了项目管理中需要进行平衡决策的一些情形,并论述了实现平衡决策的方法和应用平衡决策应当注意的问题。     

建设工程价款优先受偿权之探讨

提出了建设工程价款优先受偿权的立法背景和实践难题，探讨了相关司法解释的可操作性和须注意的问题，对其现实意义作了概述。     

The problem of unobservables in strategic management research

In this paper we argue that unobservable constructs lie at the core of a number of influential theories used in the strategic management literature—including agency theory, transaction cost theory, and the resource-based view of the firm. The debate over how best to deal with the problem of unobservables has raged in the philosophy of science literature for the best part of the current century. On the one hand, there are the positivists, who believe that theories containing unobservable constructs are only useful as tools for making predictions. According to positivists, such theories do not inform us about the deep structure of reality. On the other hand, there are the realists, who believe that our theories can give us knowledge about unobservables. Herein we review this debate, we argue for adopting a realist position, and we draw out the implications for strategic management research.