我国陶瓷行业遭遇反倾销的成因与对策

近年来,我国陶瓷行业遭遇多起反倾销调查。其原因既有发起国受金融危机的影响而出台贸易保护措施以保护其国内陶瓷产业方面的因素,也有我国陶瓷企业出口产品附加值低、价格低方面的因素。应对反倾销调查,我国陶瓷企业要积极应诉,并争取获得进口商的支持,得到行业协会和政府的帮助,同时提高产品的附加值和科技含量。     

反“社会倾销”对我国出口贸易的影响及策略

当前,发达国家出现了一种"社会倾销论",并由此作为反倾销的理由。我们应从反社会倾销的实质进行分析,对我国出口贸易的影响科学评估,寻找出解决问题的途径,并从转变经济发展方式,加强职业安全管理、逆向采购角度,提出我国应对反社会倾销的总体性策略。     

Assessing the impact of unilateral trade policies EBA and AGOA on African beneficiaries' exports using matching econometrics

The existing literature studying the impact of non‐reciprocal preferential trade agreements (NRPTAs) assumes implicitly NRPTAs are non‐randomly assigned without showing the evidence of that. Using a matching methodology, this paper investigates whether the “African Growth and Opportunity Act” (AGOA) and the “Everything But Arms” (EBA) unilateral trade concessions have had an impact, and in what magnitude, on the exports of African beneficiary countries in the light of the evidence of the non‐random nature (endogeneity) of NRPTAs. Methodologically, previous studies using the matching procedure focused on bi or multilateral trade agreements. Our work focuses on NRPTAs that depend only on donors' conditions. Accordingly, we show that for NRPTAs, gravity covariates cannot be used for the matching procedure. We propose to use political variables as determinants for obtaining non‐reciprocal trade preferences in order to address the endogenous nature of NRPTA assignment. Our main results confirm that a country becomes eligible for a NRPTA only when it meets certain conditions, defined by their donors, such as political stability and economic regulation (for AGOA), and freedom of expression and human development (for EBA). Results also show that both AGOA and EBA policies have had a positive impact on African beneficiary countries' exports to NRPTA's providers, even if the magnitude impact of EBA is significantly lower than that of AGOA.     

我国走出倾销与反倾销困境的现实选择

我国在进口和出口两个层面频繁遭遇倾销和反倾销损害。通过深化改革减少“非市场经济地位”的负面影响,着力构建产业核心竞争力,实现外贸集约化增长,健全良性的产业协调机制和灵活的诉讼抗辩机制,并结合WTO求完善我国反倾销法律体系,是我国走出倾销与反倾销困境的现实选择。     

组织变革中互惠性偏好对领导团队协同的影响研究——基于隐性知识转移的视角

团队间管理技能的学习通过隐性知识转移实现,组织变革中管理团队合作效果受文化的制约,直接影响着团队技能的提升,基于互惠性偏好的管理团队隐性知识转移的内在机理是解决这一困境的有效方式。文章分析管理团队隐性知识转移过程,变革过程中互惠性偏好对管理团队隐性知识转移的影响,构建变革过程中互惠性偏好影响管理团队隐性知识转移的基本模型,并对变革管理团队进行现实分析。     

互惠性偏好下的供应链金融委托代理模型比较研究

供应链金融是近年来兴起的用于解决中小企业融资难问题的重要金融创新之一,但目前学术界的研究多以经典的委托代理模型为基准,忽略了供应链金融参与方之间存在着互惠性偏好的倾向。文章简要回顾了委托代理理论的发展脉络,结合行为经济学家Rabin提出的互惠性偏好理论,对委托代理模型进行了行为经济学层面的拓展,以当前流行的供应链金融中核心企业与协作企业委托代理关系为研究对象,比较分析了互惠性偏好引入前后各方的收益情况。文章首先构建了经典的Holmstorm和Milgrom模型,研究了核心企业和协作企业均为理性经济主体情形下的博弈收益情况;其次,通过将互惠性偏好引入到Holmstorm和Milgrom模型中,比较分析了各方收益的变化情况;再次,通过参数校准的方法,进行了具体的数值案例分析;最后对模型未来可能的发展方向进行了展望。研究结果表明：通过引入互惠性偏好,在一定的数学条件下,核心企业和协作企业之间的契约制度设计存在着帕累托改进的空间。     

美国对华反倾销中的非市场经济问题

非市场经济地位使我国外贸出口企业在国际贸易中处于非常不利的地位，虽然这一问题存在了很久，但至今还没有得到解决。这一问题在美国对华反倾销中表现尤为突出，当前要缓解这一问题，一方面，我国政府就应积极地与美国进行经济上、政治上的沟通和双边谈判；另一方面，要从根本上改变这一现状，只有加速经济体制转型，尽快实现经济的市场化。     

从会计角度论欧盟对我国制鞋业的反倾销

我国是世界上最大的鞋类生产和出口国,而欧盟是我国第二大鞋制品出口市场。但是,从2005年开始欧盟对我国的制鞋企业开始有计划的反倾销,使得我国的制鞋企业受到重大的打击。本文通过对欧盟反倾销法的理解和认识,从会计角度分析制鞋业面对反倾销时存在的内部和外部的问题,并提出制鞋企业可从会计方面实施的对策。     

The welfare effects of U.S. antidumping duties

Antidumping duties are among the most frequently used nontariff barriers to trade. Despite this, empirical analysis of the welfare effects of antidumping duties has been very limited. This paper helps close this gap by computing the welfare effects of 30 U.S. antidumping duties. These effects are computed using a Dixit-Stiglitz type model of preferences in conjunction with data from the International Trade Commission. The paper finds that the import relief provided by antidumping duties is small in comparison to the losses imposed on U.S. consumers.     

Revisiting the Impact of Order Effects on Sensitivity to Scope: A Contingent Valuation of a Common‐Pool Resource

While many studies have employed stated preferences methods to estimate the value of non‐market ecosystem goods and services, contingent valuation (CV) still generates a significant amount of criticism. Besides ethical concerns, two of the key criticisms relate to insensitivity to scope and order effects. We examine the expectation that the presence of order effects in stepwise disclosure procedures affects the degree of scope sensitivity. We use data from a CV exercise asking farmers in Southern Spain to value two different levels of guarantee of water supply for irrigation in a context of water scarcity. We find that despite order effects being present, they do not affect the existence or the degree of sensitivity to scope. We conclude that, in the light of the mixed evidence found in the literature and the results of our study, it does not seem justified to ascribe order effects and their connection with sensitivity to scope to study design alone (e.g. step‐wise versus advanced disclosure, top‐down versus bottom‐up). The nature of the environmental good under valuation also matters. Our study of irrigation water as a common‐pool resource suggests that, when clear private benefits also exist, these appear to override any ‘good cause dumping effect’ that might arise from the public good component.