基于可持续发展的区域矿产资源配置问题研究

本文基于矿产资源的有限性和不可再生性,确立了资源优化配置的多目标准则;在全面分析影响区域矿产资源优化配置的社会经济发展需求因素,区域资源基础及潜力因素,资源开发利用的能力和水平因素,区域生态环境承载力因素,资源安全储备因素,区域外资源可供性因素,配套资源及基础设施支持因素的基础上,建立了区域矿产资源合理开发规模和速度的评价指标体系和分析计算模型;就河北省矿产资源的合理开发问题进行了具体的实证分析,研究了多目标准则下区域矿产资源开发和利用在时间维度上的优化配置问题,为合理规划和调整区域矿产资源开发利用战略提供了有益参考。     

试论财政优化资源配置的作用

资源配置客观上包含宏观、中观、微观三个层次。尽管市场在资源配置中应发挥基础性作用，但为了实现三个层次的资源配置的优化，政府财政都应发挥重要的调节作用。     

地方保护和市场分割的损失

本文运用数据包络分析方法对2000年中国30个省区市21个制造业部门的经济绩效进行了分析。结果表明，如果消除各省区市产出配置结构扭曲，以及生产要素在省区市之间配置结构扭曲，可以在不增加任何投入的情况下，使中国该年度制造业产出增长大约5％。     

信贷供给、资产配置及企业绩效——来自中国制造业上市公司的证据

近些年,中国“金融与实体经济”的研究愈发成为热点。宏观层面,资金“脱实入虚”“金融空转”的讨论亦此起彼伏。然而,针对微观层面的企业资金“脱实入虚”的研究则寥寥无几。本文选取2003—2016年中国A股制造业上市公司的年度报告数据,利用2009年宏观调控措施营造的“准自然实验”环境,采用双重差分方法探究在资金资源充足的前提下,企业配置金融资产的倾向性,并进一步研究企业绩效的后续变化情况。实证结果表明,当制造业企业获得更多的信贷资金支持,同时缺乏有效的外部监管时,企业更倾向于配置金融资产,金融活动也会在企业的日常生产经营中扮演愈发重要的角色。在此基础上,企业的主营业务却未得到发展,反而盈利能力、成长能力均受到损害,且后者受到的影响更大,即进行过多金融投资对中国A股制造业上市公司的远期影响更为深重。基于上述结论,本文从实体经济从业者、资金提供方以及监管层三个角度提出了相关政策建议。     

EXTREME VALUE THEORY IN FINANCE: A SURVEY

Extreme value theory is concerned with the study of the asymptotic distribution of extreme events, that is to say events which are rare in frequency and huge in magnitude with respect to the majority of observations. Statistical methods derived from it have been employed increasingly in finance, especially for risk measurement. This paper surveys some of those main applications, namely for testing different distributional assumptions for the data, for Value‐at‐Risk and Expected Shortfall calculations, for asset allocation under safety‐first type constraints, and for the study of contagion and dependence across markets under conditions of stress.     

辅助生产计划成本分配法教学改进小议

辅助生产计划成本分配法在教学过程中往往出现学生困惑重重无法理解,而教师是努力解释却又无法解释清楚的困境。因此,在不考虑反映和考核辅助生产车间业绩的情况下,教师可以重新对计划成本分配法厘清思路,不需要交互分配,只需将生产费用按计划分配率根据外部各受益对象的实际耗用量直接分配,简化核算又不影响最终分配结果,使学生较快理解和掌握。     

技术要素参与分配的实施现状及效果评价——基于湖北省高新技术企业的调查分析

选取湖北省高新技术企业为调查对象,通过问卷调查和访谈收集第一手资料,研究湖北高新技术企业技术要素参与分配的实施现状,通过实施效果的评价,探索企业层面技术要素参与分配方式的组合方案及宏观层面促进技术要素参与分配的政策建议。     

The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model

This study extends the literature on portfolio choice under prospect theory preferences by introducing a two-period life cycle model, where the sufficiently loss averse household decides on optimal consumption and investment in a portfolio with one risk-free and one risky asset. The optimal solution depends primarily on whether the household’s present value of the consumption reference levels is below, equal to, or above the present value of its endowment income. Reference levels below the endowment income are associated with the self-enhancement motive. In this case, the household avoids relative losses in consumption in any present or future state of nature (good or bad). As a result the degree of loss aversion does not directly affect optimal consumption and risk taking activity. Reference levels equal to the endowment income are associated with the belonging motive. An example would be a household comparing to others that belong to the same social class. In this case the household’s optimal consumption is the reference consumption and the household will not invest in the risky asset. Finally, reference levels above the endowment income are associated with the self-improvement motive (or high aspirations). For such high reference levels, households cannot avoid experiencing a relative loss in consumption, either now or in the future. As a result, loss aversion directly affects consumption and risky investment.