我国林业生物产业发展战略

分析了我国林业生物产业发展的特点与优势,阐述了我国林业生产业发展的思路和重点,提出了我国林业生物产业发展的对策。根据林业生物产业发展资源可再生性、产业多效复合、环境友好型等特点,以及资源优势突出、市场潜力巨大、技术基础良好等优势,提出我国林业生物产业发展的重点是:生物质资源的种质创新,林业生物质新材料,林源生物医药,林业生物质能源,绿色林化产品,竹藤资源生物利用。     

农户林权抵押贷款意愿及其影响因素分析——基于林业生产性融资需求的视角

利用四川省5个省级集体林权制度改革试点县(区)32个村508个农户调查数据,运用Logit模型对农户林权抵押贷款意愿及其影响因素进行实证分析。研究表明,在现行林权抵押贷款制度安排下,农户的性别、受教育年限、是否担任过村干部、非农就业人数比重、是否获得过信用贷款、投资风险承受能力、林木林产品销售比例、是否与企业签订购销合同和政府的支持等因素对农户林权抵押贷款意愿有显著影响。     

林业投资研究

运用经济学投资理论,通过历史比较的方法,对林业投资规模、林业投资结构、林业投资资金来源、林业投资经济效果、林业投资阶段几方面展开分析。结果表明:林业总投资整体呈现波动上升趋势,林业总投资中央投资占林业总投资的比重呈U形曲线变化;林业总投资占国家财政支出的比重,经历了两次波动周期;林业投资结构逐渐由森工转向营林,中央林业投资逐渐转向林业重点公共工程;林业总投资对于GDP和林业总产值的贡献率总体是先下降再上升,林业投资的直接结果是森林资源的增长。建议继续加大林业投资,坚持林业投资以生态建设为中心,坚持分类投资管理。     

我国森林资源管理工作“十二五”展望

阐述了新时期加强森林资源管理工作的重大意义,回顾了十一五期间森林资源管理取得的成绩,认为国务院批准的《全国林地保护利用规划纲要(2010～2020年)》奠定了严格保护和科学利用林地的基础。对全力开创十二五森林资源管理工作新局面,提出要正确处理保护与利用、继承与创新、监管与服务等三个关系,着力抓好构建森林资源管理新体制、创新森林资源管理新方法、强化森林资源监管法制力度、提高森林资源管理执行力等四项工作。     

亚洲林业产权现状研究与分析

通过对国内外有关亚洲林业产权文献的回顾,对亚洲林业现状、林业产权的基本概念及亚洲林业产权进展情况进行了梳理与评述,在此基础上,从不同产权类型对森林资源的影响、产权的制约因素和产权制度变迁三个方面探讨了亚洲林业产权未来的发展趋势及前景。最后,建议我国今后在实施林权制度改革时应注意:加强授予权利的支持力度;加强林主的能力建设;提供充足的机构支持;分步实施改革。     

发展林业产业是少数民族地区经济振兴的重要举措——对四川省金阳县发展青花椒产业情况的调查

从金阳县基本县情谈起,概述了金阳青花椒产业的发展现状和具体做法,分析了金阳县青花椒产业发展存在的问题,提出了今后青花椒产业发展坚持以科学发展观为指导,以市场需求为导向,以助农增收为目标,以技术创新为动力,全面推进青花椒产业快速、高效发展的思路和对策措施。     

集体林区林业专业合作社人才培养质量评估研究

基于福建省83个林业专业合作社的调查数据,运用层次分析法,构建集体林区林业专业合作社人才培养质量的评估模型,并对其进行分析。结果表明:被调查的83个林业专业合作社的人才培养质量评估的各个维度的评估、总体评估的结果均不理想。因此,提出加强对人才培养的重视,营造良好氛围;精心规划培养内容和方法,提高培养的实效性;充分运用多方资源,系统拟定分类人才培养规划;增加人才培养的投入,完善配套制度安排等建议。     

退耕还林对延安地区农业经济的影响

对延安地区11个农业县退耕前后耕地/播种总面积、种植业结构、农业投入、粮食、油料产量与单产量以及农民年均纯收入的变化进行了研究,探讨了退耕还林对延安地区农业经济的影响及其作用机制。退耕还林优化了农村的种植业结构与产业结构,全面带动了农村经济的发展。但仍然存在着一些亟待解决的问题,并给农村经济带来了一定的负面影响。     

Well on the way: An exploratory study on occupational health in hospitality

This study conducted a comprehensive review of work conditions and health risks/problems for various hospitality workers and summarized the various health and wellness promotion programs available in the workplace with the aim of identifying the key elements of successful employee wellness programs. In this review, physical health problems, such as musculoskeletal disorders, lung diseases, and dermatologic diseases, as well as mental health problems that are common among hospitality employees were discussed. In addition, different types of wellness programs that may help employees to overcome these health problems were included. In the next stage, interviews with hotel staff holding multiple positions were conducted to identify the most significant health challenges and assess their preference for various types of wellness initiatives. Using MAXQDA Pro, health-related categories and themes were extracted from the interviews. Participants believed that the lack of time, physical challenges and stress are the top three wellness challenges in the hospitality industry. In order to tackle the challenges, they stated that hospitality businesses should provide various wellness initiatives including healthy eating and weight management, smoking cessation, stress management, exercise programs, and fitbits or other wellness tracker devices.     

Determinants of Innovative Behaviour in the Hotel Industry: A cross-Cultural Study

The present study develops a conceptual framework that sheds light on whether institutional pressures (i.e., normative, mimetic, and coercive) and corporate support can improve innovative behavior across different societies and the moderating role of national cultural dimensions on this link. Our study validated these arguments empirically using data from the 2018 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). Data were collected and analyzed from 2,618 respondents. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of full-time non-managerial employees selected, from different departments of various four- and five-star hotels across five economically and culturally different societies (UK, UAE, Germany, China, USA). Our results indicated that both institutional pressures and corporate support have positive influence on employees’ innovative behaviour. Furthermore, Hotels in cultures with high levels of individualism and low levels of uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and masculinity will indicate higher levels of innovative behaviour in response to corporate support programs. While, hotels in nations with high levels of power distance, collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity will indicate higher levels of innovative behaviour in response to normative, mimetic, and coercive pressure. These findings provide important implications for innovative behaviour by developing and validating a multilevel model empirically in the hospitality context.