Accurate environmental bioindication in floodplains in spite of an extreme flood event

The ecological reaction of species on environmental factors can differ both, temporally and geographically. Therefore, bioindicator systems must be shown to remain accurate at different places and points of time. Extreme events pose challenges for testing this robustness, which has not yet been explored systematically. The unique opportunity of the extreme flooding of the river Elbe in August 2002 was used for such a test. The bioindicator system for mean groundwater depth during the vegetation period and annual duration of inundation in floodplains studied here was developed with data collected in 1999. Data from 2003 were used to analyse the dependence of the bioindication results on the humidity of the study plots and taxonomic group (plants, molluscs and carabid beetles). For the duration of inundation, the accuracy of bioindication in 2003 was similar to that in 1999, except for the medium‐humid and dry plots using molluscs as indicators. For groundwater depth, the accuracy of bioindication in 2003 was similar to that of the reference year except in the dry plots with significantly lower accuracy for all species groups. With a few exceptions, the bioindicator system is shown to be robust and to remain accurate in spite of an extreme flood event. In conclusion, the relevance of extreme events for the robustness of bioindicator systems differs between the indicated parameters and taxonomic groups. The results stress the need to take into account the limits of the working range and the occurrence of extreme events, when testing and applying bioindicator systems. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Impact of Incision of Gravel‐bed Rivers on Ground Beetle Assemblages

The impact of river incision induced by channelization and gravel mining on the structure of ground beetle assemblages in riparian habitats was investigated on three montane rivers in southern Poland. Ground beetles were collected on three benches of different elevation in 11 incised and 14 vertically stable cross sections of the rivers. In total, 5821 individuals representing 106 species were collected. The effect of river incision on the diversity and abundance of ground beetles depended on bench height. Only on the lowest bench, inundated about once per year on average, species richness of the assemblages was significantly reduced in incised river cross sections. On this bench, the abundance of the specialists of exposed riverine sediments, i.e. small and medium‐sized predators with high dispersal power and spring breeding strategy, was highly negatively affected by river incision. On the highest bench, large, brachypterous species with spring and autumn breeding strategy, typical of undisturbed habitats, were more abundant in incised cross sections. As this bench is practically not subjected to flooding even in vertically stable cross sections, these species probably benefited from the occurrence of riparian forest along most incised river sections, whereas the riparian areas along vertically stable sections are subjected to higher agricultural pressure. This study shows that in the mountain region where high precipitation helps to maintain moisture of the riparian habitats, river incision has a negative impact only on the specialists of exposed riverine sediments. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The significance of flood regimes for carabid beetle and spider communities in riparian habitats—a comparison of three major rivers in Germany

River regulation and water management practices have led to alteration of the flood regimes of all large rivers in Germany. To investigate its influence on the terrestrial arthropod fauna, a comparative study was carried out on the distribution of ground beetles (Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) at the potamal sections of three large rivers in northern Germany, the Rivers Weser, Elbe and Oder. The three rivers differ markedly in their flood dynamics, mainly owing to weirs and polder management practices, but also owing to natural conditions in their headwaters. In total, 45 sites were examined with a total capture of 46 727 carabid beetles and 38 066 adult spiders, representing 178 and 209 species, respectively. Using multivariate TWINSPAN analyses we found that the ground beetle species assemblages clearly varied according to the different flood regimes. By contrast, the spiders differentiate well between sites of different habitat structure. In particular, the river margins hosted a specialized carabid fauna, and the alluvial Quercus–Ulmus forests were habitat for some rare and endangered carabid and spider species. Whereas the fauna of the strongly regulated River Weser was impoverished regarding stenotopic hygrophilous species, the fauna of the more natural Rivers Elbe and Oder depended very much on the duration and timing of the flooding, as well as on the local micro‐topographical situation. It is concluded that low lying areas behind dykes of the Elbe, or in polders of the Oder, which become frequently inundated by river or ground water, are extremely valuable for invertebrate conservation. The data suggest that careful polder management may support suitable habitat creation for riparian species, as long as the inundation scheme corresponds to natural flood dynamics conditions. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Ground beetle habitat templets and riverbank integrity

The habitat templet approach was used in a scale‐sensitive bioindicator assessment for the ecological integrity of riverbanks and for specific responses to river management. Ground beetle habitat templets were derived from a catchment‐scale sampling, integrating the overall variety of bank types. This coarse‐filter analysis was integrated in the reach‐scale fine‐filtering approaches of community responses to habitat integrity and river management impacts. Higher species diversity was associated with the higher heterogeneity in bank habitats of the un‐navigable river reaches. The abundant presence of habitat specialists in the riverbank zone allows a habitat integrity assessment based on the habitat templet indicator species. Significant responses were detected for channel morphology in the width‐to‐depth ratio and for hydrological regime in peak frequency and peak velocity, enabling the development of evaluation methods for the impact assessment of river management and flood protection strategies. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.