排序方式: 共有16条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
中国刚刚取得一项举世瞩目的具有里程碑意义的成就:它已建成世界上最快的超级计算机——天河-1A号。该计算机比设在美国田纳西州橡树岭国家实验室的卫冕冠军快40%。这不是一个孤立的事件。多年来,其他能够反映中国科技能力在不断上升的常见指标,一直在不断涌现,比如,在世界领先的化学和物理学杂志上,来自中国的论文所占的比例在不断增加。 相似文献
2.
A better way to innovate 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
Chesbrough HW 《Harvard business review》2003,81(7):12-3, 115
Harvard professor Henry Chesbrough takes a look at leading-edge companies' latest moves to harvest ideas from outside and to benefit from sharing their own R&D with others--even with competitors. 相似文献
3.
Micro and macroeconomic adjustment processes in East Germany — Sixth report1 相似文献
4.
Micro and macroeconomic adjustment processes in East GermanyFourth report 相似文献
5.
Companies have historically invested in large research and development departments to drive innovation and provide sustainable growth. This model, however, is eroding due to a number of factors. What is emerging is a more open model, where companies recognize that not all good ideas will come from inside the organization and not all good ideas created within the organization can be successfully marketed internally. To date, Open Innovation concepts have been regarded as relevant primarily to 'high-technology' industries, with examples that include Lucent, 3Com, IBM, Intel and Millenium Pharmaceuticals. In this article, we identify organizations in industries outside 'high technology' that are early adopters of the concept. Our findings demonstrate that many Open Innovation concepts are already in use in a wide range of industries. We document practices that appear to assist organizations adopting these concepts, and discover that Open Innovation is not ipso facto a recipe for outsourcing R&D. We conclude that Open Innovation has utility as a paradigm for industrial innovation beyond high tech to more traditional and mature industries. 相似文献
6.
There is currently a broad awareness of open innovation and its relevance to corporate R&D. The implications and trends that underpin open innovation are actively discussed in terms of strategic, organizational, behavioral, knowledge, legal and business perspectives, and its economic implications. This special issue aims to advance the R&D, innovation, and technology management perspective by building on past and present studies in the field and providing future directions. Recent research, including the papers in this special issue, demonstrates an increasing range of situations where the concept is regarded as applicable. Most research to date has followed the outside-in process of open innovation, while the inside-out process remains less explored. A third coupled process of open innovation is also attracting significant research attention. These different processes show why it is necessary to have a full understanding of how and where open innovation can add value in knowledge-intensive processes. There may be a need for a creative interpretation and adaptation of the value propositions, or business models, in each situation. In other words, there are important implications for new and emerging methods of R&D management. 相似文献
7.
Henry Chesbrough 《Journal of Evolutionary Economics》1999,9(3):287-329
This paper analyses how US, Japanese, and European HDD firms responded to technological shifts in the hard disk industry
from 1973 through 1996. Leading incumbent US HDD firms were frequently forced out of the market. Leading Japanese incumbent
firms in the same industry, however, were not displaced by these changes. US startup firms thrived under these technological
shifts, displacing US incumbent firms. Japanese startups did poorly. European firms encountered the worst of both worlds:
its incumbent firms were frequently displaced by technological changes, as were US firms; while startup firms (with one exception)
performed as poorly as those in Japan. 相似文献
8.
Making sense of corporate venture capital 总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7
Chesbrough HW 《Harvard business review》2002,80(3):90-9, 133
Large companies have long sensed the potential value of investing in external start-ups, but more often than not, they fail to get it right. Remember the dash to invest in new ventures in the late 1990s and the hasty retreat when the economy turned? This article presents a framework that will help a company decide whether it should invest in a particular start-up by first understanding what kind of benefit might be realized from the investment. The framework--illustrated with examples from Intel, Lucent, and others--explains why certain types of corporate VC investments proliferate only when financial returns are high, why other types persist in good times and in bad, and why still others make little sense in any phase of the business cycle. The framework describes four types of corporate VC investments, each defined by its primary goal--strategic and financial--and by the degree of operational linkage between the start-up and the investing company. Driving investments are characterized by a strong strategic rationale and tight operational links. Enabling investments are also made primarily for strategic reasons, but the operational links are loose. Emergent investments, which are characterized by tight operational links, have little current--but significant potential--strategic value. Passive investments, offering few potential strategic benefits and only loose operational links, are made primarily for financial reasons. Passive corporate VC investments dry up in a down economy, but enabling and driving investments usually have more staying power. That's because their potential returns are primarily strategic, not financial. In other words, they can foster business growth. Emergent investments may make sense even in a weak market because of their potential strategic value--that is, their ability to help companies identify and spark the growth of future businesses. 相似文献
9.
10.