首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   4篇
  免费   0篇
财政金融   1篇
贸易经济   1篇
经济概况   2篇
  2020年   1篇
  2017年   1篇
  2011年   1篇
  2010年   1篇
排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Abstract: Natural resource endowment offers great opportunities for achieving high levels of growth and development, notably via fiscal revenue mobilization throughout the entire chain of operations from exploration to production to exports. In the case of African countries, however, resource‐rich countries have not yet been able to take full advantage of their resource wealth to mobilize government revenue. In fact it appears that they have often been outperformed by their resource‐scarce counterparts in this regard. Is the low revenue performance a result of distorted incentives induced by the natural resource bonanza or the lack of capacity to harness the revenue potential from the natural resource industry? This paper explores these questions and provides some empirical evidence based on data from a sample including African countries as well as countries from Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East for the period 1980–2007. The paper undertakes an econometric analysis to examine the factors that determine revenue performance in African countries from a comparative perspective, with a focus on the role of natural resource endowment. The results are consistent with the evidence from the literature, especially with regard to the role of economic structure (notably the share of agriculture in GDP), the tax base (per capita income), and trade. We compute an index of revenue performance that relates the actual revenue to the level predicted by the econometric model and we find that African resource‐rich countries have performed poorly relative to their resource‐scarce counterparts and compared to the oil‐rich Middle Eastern countries. The paper concludes with some policy implications for African countries.  相似文献   
2.
ABSTRACT

The aim of this note is to understand how content relating to marketing and market research is distributed to and within universities. The focus of the study includes the behavior of all those in this market for information, namely suppliers (whether content generators, aggregators, packagers, or distributors of content) of marketing research, university staff, and students. The case study method was implemented to collect data. The case study focuses on UK Higher Education. Specifically, the authors use the case study of the newly developed Archive of Market and Social Research (AMSR) to explore how content relating to marketing and market research is distributed to and within universities. The research involved personal interviews with 15 librarian senior managers selected from 14 universities.

The interviews with librarians provided insight into how AMSR could be distributed to university libraries and how it could be accessed. The findings highlight the role of university academics in specifying the content of marketing and market research. They focus on ‘real world’ management problems to deliver research with impact and relevant teaching. Therefore, they need company and industry information and are more likely to use current sources. The study maps the process of acquisition of marketing and market research content by universities and identifies the different roles involved in this process. The study is in line with the emerging literature that focuses on the role of education in explaining the relevance gap in marketing research. The study contrasts between the situation in the university market and industrial buying and adds to our understanding of the complexities associated with the distribution of the marketing research material. The result is expected to be a much sharper focus for the marketing of the archive material, leading to greater use of recent high-quality market research by marketing educators, and changes to marketing and market research syllabuses.

This note provides insight into how suppliers (whether content generators, aggregators, packagers, or distributors of content) of market and marketing research should market to universities and ensure the use of their information resources by students and teachers and how they should. The findings of the study contribute to understanding customer needs and shaping a new service product proposition. In addition, the study provides insight into how university students and staff access and should access commercial research on marketing from the market research industry (in particular from the Archive of Market and Social Research) and use it in their learning, so that their knowledge will be more up to date and their employability will be increased. Adding several insights to the issue of distribution of marketing research material to universities. The paper relates to the marketing of information resources to universities, specifically to the work of the Archive of Market and Social Research, in marketing their information assets to universities, and more specifically the relationship between the “push” of suppliers, libraries, journal and textbook suppliers and information aggregators (such as EBSCO and JISC) and the pull coming from academic researchers and lecturers, who might use this information in their teaching and research. The present study can be seen as a classic case study of understanding buyer behavior, but in a modern world of information platforms, aggregation, and the digital economy.  相似文献   
3.
4.
In an optimal carried interest model with adverse selection, the optimal profit-loss sharing ratio (PSR) explains how the risk aversion of the two parties can affect their bargaining powers by allowing investors to detect the true risk aversion of fund managers and not their true skills. The higher the management fee, the higher is the PSR. Our simulation exercise shows that when the fund manager is more risk averse than the investor for a higher invested capital and weaker expected net profit, the optimal negotiated profit-sharing ratio will be higher.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号