排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1
1.
This paper studies conversion factors based on the expenditure approach and evaluates the appropriateness for international comparisons of output levels in manufacturing. We apply a consistency check based on the insight that relative productivity levels should be invariant to the choice of base year. Consequently, convergence parameters and dispersion of productivity across countries should also be unaffected by this choice. The results are disappointing: relative measures of productivity depend heavily of the choice of base year and change systematically as the base years roll forward. The conclusion is insensitive to the applied method for developing conversion factors. The implication is that we cannot measure relative productivity levels in manufacturing across countries using the expenditure approach. 相似文献
2.
This paper analyses the importance of entrepreneurs in terms of job creation and wage growth. Relying on unique data that
cover all establishments, firms and individuals in the Danish private sector, we are able to distil a number of different
subsets from the total set of new establishments—subsets which allow us to more precisely capture the “truly new” or “entrepreneurial”
establishments than has been possible in previous studies. Using these data, we find that while new establishments in general
account for one-third of the gross job creation in the economy, entrepreneurial establishments are responsible for around
25% of this, and thus only account for about 8% of total gross job creation in the economy. However, entrepreneurial establishments
seem to generate more additional jobs than other new establishments in the years following entry. Finally, the jobs generated
by entrepreneurial establishments are to a large extent low-wage jobs, as they are not found to contribute to the growth in
average wages. 相似文献
3.
Nikolaj Malchow‐Møller James R. Markusen Bertel Schjerning 《The Scandinavian journal of economics》2013,115(2):292-325
Three types of theories have been used to explain the wage premium in foreign firms: the theories of heterogeneous workers, heterogeneous learning, and heterogeneous firms. We set up a model that explicitly encompasses two of these theories, and that can illustrate the third. This unifying framework allows us to rigorously compare the predictions of the different theories. Thus, it is a useful tool for interpreting new and existing empirical evidence. We illustrate the usefulness of the model on matched employer?employee data, and we find considerable support for all three theories. In particular, the theory of heterogeneous workers can explain up to 75 percent of the premium. 相似文献
1