排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
H. J. Corsair Jennifer Bassman Ruch Pearl Q. Zheng Benjamin F. Hobbs Joseph F. Koonce 《Group Decision and Negotiation》2009,18(4):387-417
Within stream restoration practice there has been little use of formal decision analysis methods for evaluating tradeoffs
in selecting restoration sites and design alternatives. Restoration planning suffers from poorly defined objectives, confusion
of objectives and means, and a lack of consideration of tradeoffs. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have the
potential to improve restoration decision making by quantifying non-economic objectives, communicating tradeoffs, facilitating
consistent and explicit valuation, and focusing negotiation on ultimate objectives. To explore the potential usefulness of
MCDA, we first review restoration practices and define the characteristics of projects that are good candidates for MCDA.
We also present two case studies. The first study is a prioritization of stream reaches for restoration that illustrates how
value judgments can affect such decisions. The second study addresses the proposed removal of the Ballville Dam on the Sandusky
River in Ohio. An important challenge in the dam removal decision is the linking of habitat improvements to changes in species
populations and ecological services that people value. The analysis shows how MCDA can assist decision making by clarifying
tradeoffs, in this case by showing that the key issues are conflicts among ecological criteria—not all of which are improved
by restoration. 相似文献
1