排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
A firm’s competitive behavior is an important topic for practitioners, theorists, and policy makers. Among the explanations
of firms’ behavior is Michael Porter’s model. We have presented this model along with some alternative approaches: Structure-Conduct-Performance,
the New Industrial Organization and Game Theory, the Resource-Based Perspective, and Market Process Economics. These approaches
are discussed in terms of their relations, similarities, and differences relative to Porter’s model. In our comparative discussion,
we support the use of Porter’s model to evaluate firms’ competitive behavior. Our reasons for this support are this model’s
popularity, well-defined structure, feasibility, clarity, simplicity, generality, and its complementarity to two other main
approaches. We find the Porter model to be a convenient approach to the firm’s competitive advantage and strategy.
This article draws on the thesis that Orges Ormanidhi wrote for his Masters of Philosophy from Staffordshire University. 相似文献
1