Personality Traits and Peace Negotiations: Integrative Complexity and Attitudes toward the Middle East Peace Process

Much of the literature on negotiation focuses on the effect that various personality factors, characterizing the parties or mediators involved in the process, have on negotiation outcomes. Nevertheless, there hardly can be found a study, which examines these factors with psychometrically reliable and valid tools. The present study uses psychodiagnostic projective method for measuring the personality trait known as integrative complexity, which is considered as a basic factor that connects cognitive traits to attitudes toward conflict resolution. In a sample of 26 Israeli students this trait, assessed by two Rorschach measures - the blend responses and the frequency of organizational activity - has been revealed as a personality characteristic that might explain seeking compromise agreements in negotiation. Individuals low in integrative complexity tend to rely on highly competitive and less cooperative tactics much more than highly integrative complex individuals. Projective measures for integrative complexity, assessed in this study, are suggested to test people as they are assigned to teams charged with important tasks involving complex group decisions and negotiation. In future studies of complex group decisions this psychodiagnostic approach might be used as a part of the support systems in the process of group negotiation.     

Applying Clinical Methods for Assessing Patterns of Functioning in Negotiation Processes: The Rorschach Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS)

This clinical paper suggests applying a new Rorschach measure, the Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS; Tibon et al. 2005, Int J Appl Psychoanal Stud 2:40–57) for evaluating patterns of functioning in negotiation processes. The RFS is a psychoanalytically oriented diagnostic tool, designed to operationalize Winnicott’s (Playing and reality. Basic Books, New York, 1971) construct of potential or transitional space by using a paradigm that conceptualizes the Rorschach task as inviting the respondent to enter the intermediate transitional space between inner and outer reality. The RFS ranges from  − 5, representing extreme reliance on fantasy (reality collapse) to  + 5 representing extreme reliance on reality (fantasy collapse). A score approximating zero indicates adaptive and functional use of potential space, pointing out high level of negotiator effectiveness. A case example is presented, demonstrating the utility of the RFS in evaluating negotiator effectiveness in an encounter aimed at achieving peace agreement. Although not itself a report of a lab or field experiment the paper illustrates the potential usefulness of psychoanalytically oriented conceptualization and clinical assessment methods in negotiation research and practice.     

Convergence of outcomes and evolution of strategic behavior in double auctions

We study the emergence of strategic behavior in double auctions with an equal number of buyers and sellers, under the distinct assumptions that orders are cleared simultaneously or asynchronously. The evolution of strategic behavior is modeled as a learning process driven by a genetic algorithm. We find that, as the size of the market grows, allocative inefficiency tends to zero and performance converges to the competitive outcome, regardless of the order-clearing rule. The main result concerns the evolution of strategic behavior as the size of the market gets larger. Under simultaneous order-clearing, only marginal traders learn to be price takers and make offers equal to their valuations/costs. Under asynchronous order-clearing, all intramarginal traders learn to be price makers and make offers equal to the competitive equilibrium price. The nature of the order-clearing rule affects in a fundamental way what kind of strategic behavior we should expect to emerge.     

Relational Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Negotiation Dialogue: Using the Rorschach Inkblot Method for Assessing Integrative Complexity

Negotiation theory encompasses a broad range of phenomena and makes use of a variety of perspectives. Applications of theoretical constructs referring to different realms of personality functioning (e.g., cognitive, affective, interpersonal) for understanding negotiators’ decision making have become quite common in the field. Nevertheless, the methodology used for personality assessment still needs to be broadened so as to encompass a variety of assessment tools that can be used for obtaining a more comprehensive view on negotiators’ personality functioning in relation to task performance. In line with two previous studies, published in Group Decision and Negotiation (Tibon in Group Decis Negot 9(1):1–15, 2000, Group Decis Negot 17(6):541–552, 2008) we suggest using the Rorschach Inkblot Method to extend our understanding of mental functioning within the context of negotiators’ decision making.