Ownership discrimination and private firms financing in China

This study examines the financing/funding of private firms in China. Our results show that private firms are significantly less funded through formal financing channels such as bank loans than state-owned firms, and hence have to resort to alternative financing such as trade credit. Consistent with the theoretical expectation and literature, there is a substitution effect between trade credit and bank loans for private firms, but this effect is much weaker compared to that of state-owned firms. Moreover, while the univariate comparisons indicate that private firms obtain more notes payable than state-owned firms, the multivariate regression analyses show that the relation between bank loan and notes payable is positive and indifferent between private and state-owned firms.     

中国的金融市场开发与借款证券化

在当今社会，市场对金融运行的压力越来越大，传统的融资方式已难以满足投资者的需要。一种新的金融形式——贷款证券化，使资金拥有者可以通过这一渠道将资金转移到贷款者手中。通过这种形式，可以很好地解决当今社会许多融资难的问题。目前，这种融资形式正在引起我国许多业界人士的注意，这种形式如果能够在我国的金融体系中得到完善，将会极大地促进我国的经济建设，也能很好地解决我国投融资体系中存在的诸多现实问题。     

Debtor-in-possession financing

Several recent papers have documented the benefits of debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing in the restructuring of firms in Chapter 11. However, the view on benefits is not unanimous and some legal scholars have raised doubts about DIP financing's effects on debt-holders and the possibility of expropriative wealth transfers. In this paper we address this issue by analyzing both stock and bond price data for a comprehensive sample of DIP loans and find significant positive abnormal stock and bond returns at the announcement of DIP loans. Also, we do not find evidence of wealth transfers from junior to senior debt-holders. Further, we examine the DIP loan process in detail and we document important institutional features of DIP loans such as maturity, covenants, fees and interest charges. We find evidence of intense monitoring using covenants. We also find higher fees and charges associated with DIP loans. We argue that overall the results are consistent with the information processing role of financial intermediaries.     

国家助学贷款的风险与防范

国家助学贷款是一个政治、福利、教育、金融概念的混合体。本文主要从国家助学贷款发放的现状、存在的问题人手，提出了应加强维护信用制度的法律建设；创建良好的社会信用环境；改进管理制度与操作模式；加强各部门的协调与沟通等防范措施。     

国家助学贷款：问题与建议

1996年高校招生实行并轨 ,高等教育收费制度的改革已日趋明朗 ,随着扩大招生、收费制度的改革 ,迎面而来的是逐年增多的贫困生 ,为了扩大教育消费、为了不让贫困生辍学 ,政府出台了国家助学贷款政策。实施几年来 ,显现出诸多问题 ,给全面落实带来了困难。目前国家助学贷款在重点院校进展顺利 ,而在普通院校及中小型院校进展缓慢 ,必须加以研究与解决     

制度环境的改善与我国房贷证券化的推进

实行房贷证券化,能够积极有效地推动银行和金融市场的发展,增强国家宏观政策施行的效果,从而促进经济社会的发展。借鉴美国等模式的经验,推进我国房贷证券化,需要构建适合我国MBS发展模式及其体制建设,为住房抵押贷款证券化提供发展空间,创造发展环境。     

应用期权方法构建商业银行贷款利率模型

以分析公司普通股所具有的看涨期权特性为出发点，以Black—Scholes看涨期权定价模型为基础，根据不同企业资本结构和资产回报风险的差别，构造了一个商业银行基本贷款利率模型。从期权角度来设计贷款利率模型，除考虑了企业的经营风险因责外，还同时考虑了企业融资结构所带来的财务风险，能更加全面地反映出商业银行贷款的保障程度。     

产权制度下商业银行不良资产博弈

银行的改革进行了二十几年,虽然取得了阶段性的成果,但却没有从本质上解决银行的巨额不良资产问题。本文通过建立两阶段的动态博弈模型,分析了政府与国有银行之间的利益博弈行为,阐明国有银行不良资产之所以仍然不断涌现,是由于政府对银行产权份额的过多控制而导致的。在此基础上,提出了推进彻底的银行产权制度改革、完善银行的法人治理结构的建议,以便从根本上减少银行的不良资产。     

民间借贷之现状与抉择探析

民间借贷的规模占据农村、城镇中小企业资金借贷的很大比例，尤其在个体工商户中所占比例更大。民间借贷之所以能够长期存在，有其存在的必然性。民间借贷对于提供资金资源、调整经济结构等方面具有积极的意义，但同时也有消极的影响。因此，应当从理论和政策上给予民间借贷一个合适的定位。同时，应建立民间借贷登记制度．规范其利率管理，逐步发挥其市场导向优势，使民间借贷合法化、公开化。     

Bank loan versus financial lease: how do traditional and innovative approaches within the banking sector influence economic growth? A comparative analysis between the US and China

ABSTRACT

The argument over the effects of financial structures on economic growth remains unsettled. This study, therefore, compares the dynamic correlation and lead–lag relationship between the different financial approaches within the banking sector (that is, traditional bank loans versus innovative financial leasing) and economic growth. We employ a continuous wavelet analysis using time-series data from 1982–2017 from the US (the world’s largest developed country) and China (the world’s largest developing country). The empirical results show that (1) episodes of significant correlation usually emerge during periods of reform, crisis or policy implementation; and (2) in China, traditional banking promotes economic growth in the long term, while the real economy only imputes the evolution of banks during critical economic reforms in the short term. Meanwhile, financial leasing could only promote the development of the real economy under suitable regulation; and (3) in the US, before the crises, the irrational growth of the real economy could increase bank assets, while during the crises, the traditional banking approach harms economic growth, and after the crises, financial leases play an important role in recovery. Therefore, we suggest that policymakers should establish adequate policies and regulations to solve the situation.