排序方式： 共有79条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
The literature so far provides no in-depth investigation of the determinants of decisions to contribute to crowdfunding platforms. The present article draws on work measuring the decisions and prosocial behaviours of individuals in relation to public goods, and uses survey data on crowdfunding behaviour. We surveyed an original sample of individuals in France to explore individual decisions and amounts of funding chosen to support a creative project. We show that in non-equity crowdfunding contributing money is associated with altruism. Our findings suggest that the ‘warm glow’ effect influences the level of the contribution; we show also those monetary incentives could ‘crowd out’ the decisions to contribute of crowdfunders. Our study has some implications for business strategy since understanding why people contribute adds to our knowledge about the incentives that might encourage them to increase their contributions, and allows predictions about how changes to how crowdfunding platforms are managed might affect individual incentives to give. 相似文献
2.
Claire van Teunenbroek Sandra Hasanefendic 《International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing》2023,28(1):e1773
New online forms of giving have appeared next to more traditional ways like door-to-door collections. One of these new forms is philanthropic crowdfunding: donation- and reward-based crowdfunding. Crowdfunding is a promising method for mobilising and recruiting donors who may be unreachable via traditional methods. We analysed online giving via crowdfunding, focusing on donor characteristics and giving behaviour before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis comprises survey research (n = 2125) observing giving behaviour on an individual level for both donors and non-donors. Our contributions are twofold. First, we report on the characteristics of donors who give to crowdfunding sources and in relation to donors who give via a door-to-door (i.e., ‘traditional’) collection focusing on micro- rather than macro-level data. Second, we compare the giving behaviour via crowdfunding with references to door-to-door collections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We show that the percentage of individuals supporting crowdfunding did not increase between 2018 (11%) and 2020 (12%). Regarding the amount, donors donated 13% higher amounts in 2020, but the difference was not significant. Regarding the characteristics of donors, we find that social media has a substantive role in giving via crowdfunding irrespective of other personal markers such as age, education, income, and gender, while this is not relevant in the case of door-to-door collection. Moreover, most people give to crowdfunding projects that are connected to an acquaintance, which signals that familiarity with the person initiating the crowdfunding projects plays a role. We conclude that crowdfunding, relative to more traditional giving, focuses more on informal giving than formal giving. Such an understanding requires different strategies and stimuli to increase giving via crowdfunding. 相似文献
3.
4.
对小微企业众筹发展过程中的风险问题进行研究,站在行业发展的视角对来源于小微企业、投资人、众筹平台、法律与环境的风险进行识别,并构建小微企业众筹风险评价的指标体系,利用层次分析法对识别出的来源于小微企业、投资人、众筹平台、法律与环境的主要风险进行评估,评估结果发现小微企业是最重要风险来源;根据风险评估的结果,从小微企业、投资人、众筹平台、法律与环境四个方向提出加强社会信用体系建设、建立信息披露制度与流程,设置投资人进入门槛、制定众筹平台的准入原则及管理标准等小微企业众筹的风险防范建议,为众筹的持续快速发展提供参考。 相似文献
5.
高树根 《中小企业管理与科技》2021,(10):101-102
股权众筹是公司通过出让股份获得资金的一种融资方式,它的出现很大程度上解决了中小型企业融资难、融资贵的问题。但是近年来股权众筹的发展速度逐渐放缓,同时模式本身也暴露出了较高的投资风险。针对这些投资风险,论文从退出机制、外部审计和监管三个层面给出了相应的措施建议。 相似文献
6.
Regan M. Stevenson Michael P. Ciuchta Chaim Letwin Jenni M. Dinger Jeffrey B. Vancouver 《Journal of Business Venturing》2019,34(2):348-367
Our findings extend the entrepreneurship literature by highlighting the mechanism through which self-efficacy can hinder rather than enhance performance in entrepreneurial settings. Using two complementary experimental studies and a third quasi-experimental field study on equity crowdfunding decisions, we demonstrate that self-efficacy is negatively related to decision-making performance. This relationship is mediated by reduced searching effort. Our research also indicates that high self-efficacy funders tend to exhibit a “crowd bias” whereby they over-weight the opinions of the crowd, increasing the likelihood that they will fund poor quality ventures when such ventures are favored by the crowd. We introduce the term crowd bias and explore its effects, establishing that social indicators in the form of crowd cues can exasperate the negative effects of self-efficacy. 相似文献
7.
Othmar M. Lehner 《Entrepreneurship & Regional Development》2014,26(5-6):478-499
The multi-levelled processes taking place in Crowdfunding (CF), when tapping a large heterogeneous crowd for resources, and the often fundamentally different intentions of individual crowd members in the case of highly desirable social ventures with little prospect for economic gains, may lead to a different logic and approach to how entrepreneurship develops. Using this under-institutionalized sphere as both, context and subject, the author seeks evidence and a new understanding of entrepreneurial routes by using the sociological perspectives of Bourdieus' four forms of capital as a lens on 36 cases of social ventures. In the cases, opportunity recognition, formation and exploitation could not be distinguished as separate processes. CF and sourcing help form the actual opportunity and disperse information at the same time. In addition, the ‘nexus’ of opportunity and entrepreneur is breached in CF of social causes through the constant exchange of ideas with the crowd, leading to norm-value pairs between the funders and the entrepreneurs. Issues of identification and control are thus not based upon any formal relationship but based on perceived legitimization and offered democratic participation leading to the transformation of social capital (SC) into economic capital (EC). Success is based upon the SC of the entrepreneurial teams, yet the actual resource exchange and transformation into EC is highly moderated by cultural and symbolic capital that is being built up through the process. 相似文献
8.
Fabrice Herv Elodie Manth Aurlie Sannajust Armin Schwienbacher 《Journal of Business Finance & Accounting》2019,46(5-6):762-783
We investigate determinants of investment decisions in investment‐based (equity and bond) crowdfunding campaigns, using a novel investment‐, investor‐ and campaign‐level database, where equity refers to investments in entrepreneurial start‐ups and bonds to large real estate projects. We find that investors who have higher social interactions invest more. Social interactions are important in an equity crowdfunding context but do not affect participation in bond investments. This is consistent with the view that investors' social networks help reduce information asymmetry. Women invest less in the riskiest (equity) investments but more in safer ones (bonds). These findings are better explained by differences in risk aversion than differences in overconfidence between men and women. Overall, the findings contribute to the understanding of how investment‐based crowdfunding can be a viable source of entrepreneurial finance and how entrepreneurs' campaign decisions affect investor participation in this new form of entrepreneurial finance. 相似文献
9.
10.
随着金融创新力度加大,以股权众筹为代表的互联网金融模式在拓宽中小微企业融资渠道,丰富普惠金融内涵的同时,也为投资者保护带来了严峻挑战。中国证券业协会发布的《私募股权众筹融资管理办法》对股权众筹投资者保护进行了详细规定。在股权众筹投资者保护方面,《管理办法》表现出信息披露适度、投资者范围明确、外部监管与自律管理结合的内在逻辑,体现了软法和自律管理为主、原则导向的投资者保护监管的思维特点。针对股权众筹的普惠金融属性,可从合格投资者限定、信息披露具体要求、征信体系建设、投资者冷静期设立方面对《管理办法》加以完善,力求在现有法治框架下促进股权众筹投资者保护制度的完善和发展。 相似文献