阿托伐他汀钙治疗血管性痴呆的临床疗效

目的探讨阿托伐他汀钙治疗血管性痴呆的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取我院收治的血管性痴呆患者78例,随机将其分为两组,对照组患者采取常规药物治疗,治疗组患者在此基础上加用阿托伐他汀钙治疗;比较两组患者临床治疗效果。结果治疗前,两组患者简易智能状态量表(MMSE)、日常生活能力量表(ADL)及长谷川痴呆量表(HDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,治疗组患者的MMSE评分、ADL评分、HDS评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阿托伐他汀钙治疗血管性痴呆的临床疗效明显,可改善患者的认知功能,提高患者生活能力和生活质量。     

Cost–effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin vs switching to rosuvastatin therapy in Portugal

Abstract

Background:

Statin monotherapy is the mainstay of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management for high cardiovascular risk patients in Portugal; however, several therapeutic options are available and predicted to have different clinical and economic impacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding ezetimibe 10?mg (EZ10) to atorvastatin 10 or 20?mg (A10/20) vs switching to rosuvastatin 10 or 20?mg (R10/20) in Portuguese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or diabetes who are currently above the LDL-C goal.     

瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀治疗冠心病的疗效研究

目的采用对比法分析瑞舒伐他汀和阿托伐他汀对冠心病患者在非调脂、调脂方面及动脉粥样硬化逆转和安全性方面的疗效。方法选取2010年10月至2013年4月我院进行冠状动脉造影并证实为冠心病的患者160例,对其实施常规治疗。采取随机抽签分组的方式分为两组,治疗组口服瑞舒伐他汀片,对照组口服阿托伐他汀,疗程均为1年。对所有患者在治疗前、治疗后6、12个月的疗效、安全性进行比较。结果疗程结束后,组间比较发现治疗组各项均优于对照组,且组内比较也具有统计学意义。结论瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀两种药物均对动脉粥样硬化进程具有良好的逆转或延迟作用,能有效降低冠心病患者Hcy和血hs-CRP水平,改善患者血脂状况,但瑞舒伐他汀较阿托伐他汀的效果更加显著。     

Comparing the effectiveness of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in preventing cardiovascular outcomes: estimates using the Archimedes model

Abstract

Objective:

This study used simulation to compare the effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20?mg vs atorvastatin 40?mg, and rosuvastatin 40?mg vs atorvastatin 80?mg in preventing MACE in a range of patient populations with varying baseline cardiovascular risk.

Research design and methods:

The Archimedes Model was used to simulate head-to-head clinical trials in nine patient populations: Framingham Risk Score (FRS)?≥?5%, 5–10%, 10–20%,?>?20%, EURO-SCORE?≥?5% and >10%, diagnosed diabetes, secondary prevention (history of myocardial infarction or stroke, CVD), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Simulated patients, aged 45–70 at trial start, were based on the NHANES 1999–2006. Treatments were modeled using results from the STELLAR, JUPITER, CARDS, ASCOT-LLA, and TNT trials. Treatment models were confirmed using trial validations.

Results:

Comparing rosuvastatin 20?mg vs atorvastatin 40?mg, the 5-year numbers needed to treat to prevent one MACE event (NNT) were 525, 70, and 55 for the FRS?≥?5%, CVD, and ACS groups, respectively. Comparing rosuvastatin 40?mg vs atorvastatin 80?mg the corresponding NNT values were 468, 63, and 51. The 20-year relative risks of MACE in the FRS?≥?5% population were 0.907 (0.901–0.913) for rosuvastatin 20?mg vs atorvastatin 40?mg and 0.892 (0.884–0.901) for rosuvastatin 40?mg vs atorvastatin 80?mg. The relative risks were similar for the remaining populations.

Conclusions:

This study found that rosuvastatin 20?mg and 40?mg lowers the risk of MACE more than atorvastatin 40?mg and atorvastatin 80?mg. While simulation models cannot replace real-world clinical trials, this study bridges gaps in the evidence, and identifies high risk cohorts that would likely see additional benefit from treatment with rosuvastatin rather than atorvastatin.     

依达拉奉联合阿托伐他汀钙治疗急性脑梗死患者的临床疗效

目的 探讨依达拉奉联合阿托伐他汀钙治疗急性脑梗死患者的疗效.方法 选取2019年1月至2020年1月于大连市中心医院神经内科住院治疗的急性脑梗死患者68例作为研究对象,据其住院病例号码随机分为他汀组与联合组,各34例.两组患者接受抗血小板聚集、改善循环、降低颅内压、改善脑水肿等基础治疗,并监测各项生命指征指标,如血压、...