Uncertainty,Control, and Karl Polanyi’s Protective Response

Post-Keynesian institutionalist economists like Wallace Peterson and John Kenneth Galbraith recognized that the impact of uncertainty on economic wellbeing depends in part on the degree of control people have over the sources and consequences of it. Given the inability of government and other large institutions to reduce uncertainty or to provide citizens with the ability to manage it, mediating structures are considered as an alternative means of promoting economic security. The article concludes by describing and evaluating several of these alternatives.     

深化对马克思企业理论的研究

深化对马克思企业理论的研究既有助于澄清一些人认为“马克思没有企业理论”的误解,也有助于纠正企业理论研究中“言必称西方”的倾向,还可以为我国的企业改革实践提供指导。研究的途径有“回到马克思”、“依据变化了的实际分析马克思企业理论的‘合理内核’与时代局限”、“批判性地借鉴西方经济学的企业理论”等。     

马克思和凯恩斯的比较：有效需求问题探源

有效需求问题是市场经济或现代资本主义经济的核心问题。与强调技术关系分析的主流新古典理论不同，马克思经济学和凯恩斯经济学基于市场经济或资本主义竞争关系的博弈规则，表明了资本主义有效需求问题的根源，即利润率的下降或经济衰退来自于过高的资本存量价值或扭曲的收入分配。当前，有效需求问题也是我国宏观经济的核心问题，借鉴两位学者的分析解决我国市场经济的有效需求问题，将具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。     

马克思的经济增长理论模型

马克思经过二十多年的科学拓荒,独立地开辟了后来被称为经济增长理论的新领域。在经济增长理论史上,马克思第一次将静态分析动态化、短期分析长期化,建立了第一个经济增长理论模型。马克思主义经济学家费里德曼以马克思经济增长理论模型为根据,建立了第一个经济增长数学模型。研究马克思经济增长理论模型以及后来马克思主义经济学家据此建立的经济增长数学模型,借鉴西方经济增长模型中的合理因素,从实际出发,深入探索相关理论和现实问题,对弘扬和发展马克思主义经济增长理论具有重大意义。     

马克思货币需求理论与西方货币需求理论的比较

货币理论是经济学中最富争论的理论之一。货币理论的基础也就是供求规律。对于其中的货币需求理论,从古至今有不少学者发表了不同的看法,形成了几种互不相同但彼此又有一定联系的学说。比较这些理论的异同,对于我们学习货币理论并制定和分析现实的货币政策具有重要的理论意义和实践价值。     

Marx 200: The Abiding Relevance of the Labour Theory of Value

ABSTRACT

Marxist political economy is alive and well, and not just because of the habitual turn to Marx in response to any crisis of capitalism. Both through Capital and through the continuing evolution of Marxism, Marxist political economy offers valuable insights that can illuminate the modalities of social and economic reproduction and the relationships between (different aspects of) the economic and the non-economic. Marxism’s presence has been felt through its own internal debates and debates with other approaches to political economy, and even through its influence on those reacting against Marxism. The key to the continuing relevance and analytical strengths of Marxist political economy lies in its capacity to provide a framework of analysis for unifying disparate insights into and critiques of the contradictions of capitalism across the social sciences. The instrument for forging that unity is Marx’s theory of value, the potential of which is examined and illustrated with reference to the Sraffian critique and two key concepts in Marxian political economy: the value of labour power and financialisation. They are explored in the light of the processes of commodification, commodity form and commodity calculation.     

Marx and Engels’ Vision of a Better Society

Notwithstanding their much noted aversion to detailing the nature of a post-capitalist society, Marx and Engels indeed have a broad vision of such a better society that both runs through and informs their entire lives' work. It is rooted in their concepts of the inherently social nature of humans and potential authentic human development in accord with human nature, and the negation by humans as the active agents of history of the barriers posed to that development. This paper discuses their dialectic approach to defining a better society, their concept of human nature that it rests on, and finally specifies a number general aspects they give for a better future socialist society.     

理性的智慧——社会主义理论从空想到科学实现蜕变的决定性思维

《共产党宣言》的完成标志着社会主义理论实现了从空想到科学的转变。在这个转变当中,理性思考和逻辑论述始终起着重要的作用。     

马克思"资本主义再生产周期"与西方"经济长周期论"比较研究

马克思的再生产理论表明,社会生产的两大部类及两大部类之间必须保持一定的比例关系,社会总资本再生产才能顺利进行。但是,由于资本主义制度固有的内在矛盾———生产的社会化与生产资料的私人占有这一基本矛盾,使社会再生产所要求的比例关系往往不能保持,导致经济危机的爆发。在马克思之后,资本主义经济危机爆发日趋严重,一些马克思主义经济学家和西方资产阶级经济学家对这一现象进行了研究,“西方经济长周期理论”就是其突出成果之一。但是,由于西方资产阶级经济学家阶级的局限性以及在此立场上所形成的社会观、历史观和方法论,都制约和妨碍了他们对经济长周期理论的深入研究和本质分析,这也是他们得不出科学理论的根本原因。     

马克思企业理论的当代价值

在《资本论》中,马克思通过分析企业签约人的权力界定、内部分工与社会分工的异同,构建了经济学理论的第一个企业理论分析框架。马克思企业理论的系统性、深刻性和规范性使其在企业理论发展史中具有十分突出的地位。它与西方现代主流企业理论的分析框架在权力配置来源、不完全契约的原因解释和企业理论的演进逻辑方面存在分歧。两相比较,马克思企业理论更为完整和系统化。通过对马克思企业理论的进一步思考和研究,认为马克思企业理论对我国当前的企业改革,特别是国企改革具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。