Cost analysis of a disease management programme for adult Medicaid clients with schizophrenia

Summary

This investigation assessed changes in direct medical costs, from the perspective of a public payer, associated with a comprehensive, field-based disease management programme for adult Medicaid clients with schizophrenia in the US State of Colorado.

A propensity score-matching algorithm was employed in this retrospective analysis owing to the inherent non-randomisation of enrollees. Of the 126 clients initially enrolled, 73 (58%) remained within the programme continuously for 6–12 months.

These participants were associated with 30% lower overall per member per month medical costs (p<0.001), although no differences were noted for overall pharmacy costs. Provision of the disease management programme was through an external vendor and cost $31,250 per month regardless of the number enrolled.

Future research should seek to assess long-term clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes in this population and to develop methods that increase programme participation.     

英美两国疾病管理模式比较

本文结合英美两国医疗卫生体制的特点，总结了疾病管理在两国的发展情况，全面分析了疾病管理模式中的相关利益主体，对我国学习国外疾病管理模式中的先进经验具有重要的启示作用。     

Risperidone: An assessment of its economic benefits in the treatment of schizophrenia

Summary

A variety of economic studies have been carried out in Europe, North America and Australia. Risperidone is dominant over haloperidol, providing both an improvement in patient benefit and decreasing direct medical costs. These effects are most marked in patients who continue risperidone treatment. Treatment failures need more study, but the costs of therapeutic trial are low enough to recommend risperidone in preference to conventional antipsychotics for patients requiring new or alternative treatment for schizophrenia.

Much of the evidence for the economic benefits of risperidone comes from studies with historical controls in treatment resistant or treatment intolerant patients. The biggest contributor to the economic impact of risperidone is the reduction in hospital stay resulting from treatment with the drug. More long-term work is required with parallel control groups and also with less severely ill patients.     

Economic burden of hospital malnutrition and the cost–benefit of supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients in Latin America

Abstract

Aim: Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is a prevalent condition that significantly increases the risk of adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients, particularly those with critical illness. Limited data is available on the economic burden of DRM and the cost–benefit of nutrition therapy in high-risk populations in Latin America. The aims of the present study were to estimate the economic burden of DRM and evaluate the cost–benefit of supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in critically ill patients who fail to receive adequate nutrient intake from enteral nutrition (EN) in Latin America.

Methods: Country-specific cost and prevalence data from eight Latin American countries and clinical data from studies evaluating outcomes in patients with DRM were used to estimate the costs associated with DRM in public hospitals. A deterministic decision model based on clinical outcomes from a randomized controlled study and country-specific cost data were developed to examine the cost–benefit of administering SPN to critically ill adults who fail to reach ≥60% of the calculated energy target with EN.

Results: The estimated annual economic burden of DRM in public hospitals in Latin America is $10.19 billion (range, $8.44 billion–$11.72 billion). Critically ill patients account for a disproportionate share of the costs, with a 6.5-fold higher average cost per patient compared with those in the ward ($5488.35 vs. $839.76). Model-derived estimates for clinical outcomes and resource utilization showed that administration of SPN to critically ill patients who fail to receive the targeted energy delivery with EN would result in an annual cost reduction of $10.2 million compared with continued administration of EN alone.

Limitations: The cost calculation was limited to the average daily cost of stay and antibiotic use. The costs associated with other common complications of DRM, such as prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation or more frequent readmission, are unknown.

Conclusions: DRM imposes a substantial economic burden on Latin American countries, with critically ill patients accounting for a disproportionate share of costs. Cost–benefit analysis suggests that both improved clinical outcomes and significant cost savings can be achieved through the adoption of SPN as a therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients who fail to receive adequate nutrient intake from EN.     

药物经济学PBL教学方法改革与实践

目的：探讨PBL教学方法在药物经济学教学中的适应性和应用效果。方法：通过专家构建药物经济学教学效果评定体系,在我校本科生教学中实践和运用PBL教学方法,并由学生依据教学效果评定指标体系对教学改革的效果做出评价。结果与结论：在我校本科生药物经济学教学中实践PBL教学改革教学效果比非PBL教学课程的教学效果＂好很多＂,PBL教学方法适合在药物经济学教学中应用。     

Medical resource use and cost of different first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer in Brazil

Abstract

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The availability of new chemotherapeutic agents have modified the treatment of mCRC over the years creating the need to evaluate the financial impact of treatment. The aim of this study was to establish and quantify the financial resources needed during the first-line treatment of mCRC in Brazil.

Methods: The authors began by reaching expert consensus using a modified Delphi panel with oncologists working at public and private services in Brazil. Costs were calculated using official databases and the microcosting technique.

Results: The panel reached consensus on six regimens used in the first-line treatment of mCRC, as well as the resources involved in the administration of these regimens. All the regimens contain either fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin or capecitabine, combined with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The analysis showed that, when compared with intravenous 5-FU/leucovorin, the cost of capecitabine was offset by administration costs.

Conclusion: The panel concluded that regimens containing capecitabine, especially capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) are less expensive than those containing 5-FU/leucovorin. Given the comparable efficacy and good tolerability of the XELOX regimen, it may be an attractive choice for the first-line treatment of Brazilian patients with mCRC.     

Cost effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment of influenza: a critique of published methods and outcomes

Objective: The objective of this review was to determine, from a systematic assessment of published data, the cost effectiveness of the neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medication oseltamivir in comparison with usual care (i.e. over-the-counter medication such as analgesics and antipyretics for symptomatic relief) for the treatment of influenza. How the findings of each of the studies considered related to the methods used for each analysis and the assumptions made were specifically reviewed.

Results: The online search found 80 individual articles, 66 of which did not meet the pre-defined screening criteria. The 14 studies remaining reported cost, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses for oseltamivir treatment in various groups: healthy adults and adolescents, children, elderly, and individuals at increased risk.

Conclusion: Despite the range of values assumed for key probabilities such as the diagnostic certainty of influenza among people presenting with influenza-like illness, and how much work time is lost due to illness in healthy adults, base-case analyses consistently showed oseltamivir treatment to be cost effective or even cost saving for the four population groups studied, a conclusion that is in-line with previous reviews on this topic. However, clarity was frequently lacking in the published data in terms of various model assumptions and results, particularly with regards to the exact distributions of the constituting elements of savings and of quality-adjusted life years gained.     

Reduction in costs of inpatient stay associated with clozapine treatment: A retrospective study

Summary

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug used to treat the 10-25% of patients who suffer from schizophrenia who are treatment resistant or intolerant to standard antipsychotic drug treatment. A major issue associated with treatment is the high cost of the drug compared to standard antipsychotic drug treatment. Research carried out to date has suggested that despite the high cost of clozapine, it is overall a cost-effective treatment. This contention is based on the findings described elsewhere that clozapine treatment is associated with a dramatic decrease in psychiatric inpatient stay.

There are many ethical difficulties associated with a prospective double-blind controlled trial of clozapine treatment. We have therefore reported on a retrospective audit. A retrospective analysis was carried out by the examination of computerised patient records to determine if clozapine treatment had been associated with a reduction in psychiatric inpatient stay. Also examined was whether clozapine treatment had been associated with an overall shift from intensive therapeutic ward usage.

For example, patients are moved from intensive care and acute wards to wards with less intensive therapeutic input such as continuing care and rehabilitation wards. The inpatient stay details for 76 patients prescribed clozapine since early 1991 were examined before and after clozapine treatment commenced. The main problem with this retrospective analysis is that without any control group observed over the same time period, it is very difficult to assess how much of the decrease in bed usage is related to either the natural history of the disease and/or to changes in bed use over time associated with changes in mental health service provision and the development of community facilities.

Psychiatric inpatient stay decreased by a statistically non-significant average of 13.2 days (6%) in the first year of treatment (p=0.7692), a non-significant average of 34 days (15%) in the second year of treatment (p=0.0669), a significant average of 38.4 days (17%) in the third year of treatment (p=0.0007) and again by a significant average of 51.2 days (22%) in the fourth year of treatment (p=0.0011).

The average cost per inpatient bed-day for the main psychiatric hospital in the Health Board's area is £90.86 (based on 100% occupancy rate, 1994/95 prices). The reduction in bed days identified was equivalent to a saving of £1,200 per patient in the first year of treatment, £3,090 per patient in the second year, £3,490 per patient in the third year and £4,652 per patient in the fourth year. The average annual cost of clozapine per patient is approximately £2,500.

Clozapine treatment was also associated with a shift from intensive care and acute ward inpatient usage to continuing care and rehabilitative ward usage. In the year prior to clozapine treatment intensive care and acute ward stay accounted for 72.7% of total inpatient stay. In the first year of treatment this proportion decreased to 63.7%, in the second year to 39.5%, in the third year to 31.8% and in the fourth year to 24.6%. This represented potential savings of £500,000 per annum.

Overall, the data generated from this study indicated that clozapine treatment is associated with both a reduction in psychiatric bed usage and a shift to less therapeutically intensive care wards. However, the decrease identified is not as dramatic as the reduction quoted elsewhere in the literature. These findings provide useful costing information to support the view that clozapine is a cost-saving or cost-neutral treatment in terms of the provision of psychiatric services in the UK. However, the costs associated with the increased use of community services by the study group were not identified in this review. In order to establish whether or not clozapine is cost saving overall compared to standard antipsychotic treatment it would have been necessary to identify all costs, including the whole range of community costs, before and after treatment commenced.     

Mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder: cost-effectiveness from US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives

Background and objective: The first class of oral pharmacologic treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) are antimuscarinics that are associated with poor persistence, anticholinergic adverse events, and increased anticholinergic burden (ACB) with risk of cognitive impairment. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenoceptor agonist, is an oral treatment that does not contribute to ACB and has early evidence of improved persistence. The objective of the analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron for OAB vs six antimuscarinics in the US.

Methods: A Markov state-transition model assessed US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives over a 3-year time horizon in an OAB patient population. Transition probabilities between five micturition and five incontinence severity states were derived from a network meta-analysis of 44 trials of oral OAB treatments. Therapy beginning with an oral OAB agent could discontinue or switch to another oral agent and could be followed by tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Utilities were mapped from incontinence and micturition frequencies as well as demographics. Based on analysis of data from a large healthcare system, elevated ACB was associated with increased healthcare utilization and probability of cognitive impairment.

Results: From both commercial and Medicare Advantage perspectives, mirabegron was the most clinically effective treatment, while oxybutynin was the least expensive. Tolterodine immediate release (IR) was also on the cost-effectiveness frontier. The analysis estimated costs per QALY of $59,690 and $66,347 for mirabegron from commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, respectively, compared to tolterodine IR. Other antimuscarinics were dominated.

Conclusions: This analysis estimated that mirabegron is a cost-effective treatment for OAB from US commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, due to fewer projected adverse events and comorbidities, and data suggesting better persistence.