论传统外部性理论解决环境代际外部性的失效

代际外部性问题主要是人类代际之间行为的相互影响,尤其是前代对后代、当代对后代的影响。在解决代际外部性上,施害者、受害者和政府生活在不同的时空中,新古典方法几乎就无能为力。产权的界定是在产权主体存在的前提下进行的,所以产权在代际进行界定是不可能实现的,所以通过科斯定理来消除代际的外部性也行不通。     

从马克思主义经济学看庇古分析与科斯分析之异同及其政策启示

针对外部性市场失效引发的生态环境问题,文章从讨论庇古分析与科斯分析的本质着手,运用马克思主义经济学关于个别生产与社会生产之关系的观点,引入价值体系与价格体系的数学规划模型,通过模型分析,从产权过程的角度,讨论庇古分析与科斯分析之并同和不完备性,从制度工具论的角度,归纳了两大分析的政策启示。     

村级财务治理新机制:村务(财务)监督委员会及其制度的学理解析——基于浙江武义县后陈村的调查

本文从浙江武义县后陈村财务监督个案出发,以财务学、制度经济学与法学为主要分析工具,对后陈村村务（财务）监督委员会组织及其制度进行学理解析,最终提出一般性结论与建议.     

The Coase Theorem Revisited: Implications for Economic Transition

This paper supports the view expressed by other authors that Ronald Coase’s ideas are often misrepresented in the academic world. It restates some of Coase’s main findings with special emphasis on their relevance to processes taking place in Eastern Europe. The goal of this paper is to revisit Coasean theory, to prove that oftentimes it is misrepresented and misinterpreted and to show its relevance to some societies experiencing high transaction costs. The role of the legal system under high transaction costs is stressed in its importance to transitional economies experiencing staggeringly high transaction costs. This paper tries to shed light on the importance of transaction costs in the newly emerging markets and the respective role courts and the government should play in directing economic resources.

庇古与科斯的规制理论比较

庇古和科斯的规制理论在观点上有着明显的冲突.庇古认为,由于外部性等原因,部分产品的边际私人纯产值与边际社会纯产值并不相等,因此政府必须界入进行管制,对外部性产品收取庇古税;科斯则认为,产权不清才是外部性成本的原因,由此提出了只要明确产权市场就能良好运行的科斯定理.科斯在庇古的基础上拓展了外部性规制理论,但"科斯定理"并不能超越和替代"庇古税".     

科斯产权理论的适用范围与土地产权理论的发展

科斯提出,只要财产权是明确的,并且交易成本为零或者很小,那么,无论在开始时将财产权赋予谁,市场均衡的最终结果都是有效率的。科斯的产权理论对于优化资源配置、完善产权制度具有重要意义,但其对于土地这一不一定具有可替代性的资产,并不完全适用。通过实例定性分析科斯产权理论的局限性和适用范围,阐述土地产权位移理论提出的背景,为土地产权理论的进一步发展提供可借鉴的参考。     

THE CASE FOR A COMMUNITY TRANSACTION ENGINE: GETTING COASE FOR THE TWENTY‐FIRST CENTURY

New types of marketplace are now becoming viable. They can slash transaction costs, bring new resources into the economy and expand economic opportunity. These markets can be grown by the private sector. But, to deliver their full potential, they need a change in the mindset of government.     

COPENHAGEN,CANCÚN AND THE LIMITS OF GLOBAL WELFARE ECONOMICS

The rise of a global welfare economics directed at the environmental challenges facing our planet represents a new policy phenomenon. This paper examines the most ambitious attempt so far to put such economics into practice via the Kyoto Protocol and more specifically the Clean Development Mechanism of the Protocol. The Copenhagen and Cancún climate change conferences have put an end to hopes of the Protocol serving as an effective tool in the mitigation of global warming. This failure of the new global welfare economics is the result of flawed principles, not just defective implementation.