杠杆融资项目净现值计算方法的比较与分析

负债融资具有杠杆效应,有节税收益。计算杠杆融资项目的净现值,如仍按全权益融资项目的方法计算,其结果会有所不同,直接影响投资决策的正确性。本文介绍三种西方常用的杠杆融资项目的净现值计算方法,并对其适用条件进行比较和分析。     

上市公司资本结构微观决定因素分析

我国上市公司资本结构的突出特点是偏好股权资本,内源融资和债权融资的比重偏低,这有悖于经典的资本结构理论。本文分析了决定上市公司资本结构的微观因素,并提出了优化上市公司资本结构的建议。     

EVA(经济增加值)浅议

由于明确考虑到资金成本,经济增加值考察的是公司当期创造的真正价值,在证券市场、绩效评价和经营理念上有着广泛的用途,但同样也存在着缺陷.     

Three discount methods for valuing projects and the required return on equity

In this paper we discuss the required return on equity for a simple project with a finite life. To determine a project’s cost of equity, it is quite common to use Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition II (1963). However, if the assumptions of MM do not hold, Proposition II will lead to wrong required returns and project values. This paper gives an example of how the cost of equity should be determined in order to obtain correct valuations. The methods we apply are the Adjusted Present Value method, the Cash Flow to Equity method and the WACC method.     

谈加权平均资本成本法在个别项目评估中的应用

现实当中,由于企业暂时无需纳税,资本结构当中债务融资比例不固定,个别项目与企业整体资产风险差异较大等因素的存在,使得直接运用加权平均资本成本(WACC)对个别项目进行价值评估和资本预算分析容易产生较大的偏差甚至可能导致错误的决策,因此,对具体项目的风险系数进行调整以正确使用WACC方法进行项目价值评估,从而使得出的结论更为可靠有效,有助于企业更好地进行项目筹资和投资决策。     

The weighted average cost of capital is not quite right: Reply to M. Pierru

In this journal [Miller, R. A. (2009). The weighted average cost of capital is not quite right. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 128–138], I argued that the standard WACC formula is inadequate in most circumstances to reward stockholders and bondholders where the necessary cash flows are calculated separately to exactly cover the respective costs of capital. Axel Pierru [2009. ‘The weighted average cost of capital is not quite right’: A comment. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 1219–1223] observes correctly that my assumed repayment schedules (equal periodic payments to bondholders; similarly for stockholders) imply a temporal drift in the debt (or leverage) ratio; he would recalculate the WACC annually. He proposes an alternative calculation of the repayment schedules under the constraint of a constant debt ratio. Here I suggest three additional possible repayment schedules; in general repayment schedules determine the drift in the debt ratio. However, the expected repayment schedules are established at the time the project is accepted and financed, hence the relevant debt ratio is that which exists at that time. The WACC for a specific project need not (and should not) be recalculated for that project throughout its financial life when that project has already been accepted and financed.     

电网建设项目融资租赁基准收益率的确定

在电网建设项目融资租赁中,出租人进行投资决策时首先面临的问题就是确定项目融资租赁的基准收益率。采用资本资产定价模型(CAPM)与加权平均资本成本法相结合的方法,计算出了电网建设项目融资租赁的基准收益率。该方法不但适用于电网建设项目融资租赁,同样适用于其他行业的融资租赁项目。     

A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation

A quarter‐century ago, Miles and Ezzell (1980) solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L = D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β _S = [1 + (1 ? τ)L]β_u, although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy.     

Cost of capital: spot rate or forward rate?

In this study, we intend to reveal some problems with the classic valuation method – the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) method. We first address a fundamental question about WACC, that is, should WACC be interpreted as a spot rate, a forward rate or any kind of average of either of them? We show that the nature of WACC is the expected forward rate. We next demonstrate that without understanding this nature, we may misinterpret the famous MM formula and MM Proposition II, as well as develop incorrect valuation framework. Our findings provide insightful implications to academia and practitioners for the proper interpretation and implementation of the WACC method.     

房地产项目经济评价中基准收益率设定的探讨

目前我国在项目投资评价中仍采用在经济条件下制定的基准收益率,这已经不符合我国目前市场经济的要求。房地产作为我国的支柱性产业,更不适合采用此基准收益率。借鉴目前国际上使用较为广泛成熟的加权平均资本成本方法,提出适合我国国情的基准收益率的确定方法。