论亚里士多德的模仿说

在古希腊文论中,亚里士多德的模仿说涉及艺术的起源、艺术的构成以及艺术与现实的关系等问题,在西方文论史上具有举足轻重的地位。亚里士多德的模仿说对现代文艺理论影响颇深,无论是模仿、词本身的意思、在文论中的意思,还是模仿的源流、模仿的种差和模仿的缺陷等都是学者们研究的重点。     

和谐社会视阈下的亚里士多德分配公正观

要构建和谐社会,必须把分配正义放在重要的位置。在希腊后期,人们则倾向于把正义等同于公正。在亚里士多德（以下简称亚氏）看来,只有在分配上真正做到比例平等,城邦才能幸福稳定长久。尽管在具体操作层面亚氏的分配公正存在些许问题,但是直到今天它仍闪耀着思想的光辉。     

论康德纯粹实践理性的实现——兼论康德与亚里士多德至善概念的主要异同

康德的纯粹理性在理论上的解决必须回到实践中,这就是康德纯粹实践理性的根本任务之一。纯粹实践理性本身的实现才是纯粹理性在实践上的完成。康德对纯粹实践理性的实现指出具体的道路或步骤,即实践理性的对象以及其对象得以实现的保证。这在康德哲学中分别是至善问题和三大悬设(公设)的问题。比较了康德与亚里士多德至善概念的主要异同,最后给出解决康德伦理学的解释学路线,即康德和亚里士多德伦理学结合的可能性。     

On Corporate Virtue

This paper considers the question of virtues appropriate to a corporate actor’s moral character. A model of corporate appetites is developed by analogy with animal appetites; and the pursuit of initially virtuous corporate tendencies to an extreme degree is shown to be morally perilous. The author thus refutes a previous argument which suggested that (1) corporate virtues, unlike human virtues, need not be located on an Aristotelian mean between opposite undesirable extremes because (2) corporations do not have appetites; and (3) corporate virtues must serve the end of sustainable profit. If these disanalogies between corporate and human virtue no longer hold, then the stage is set for us to formulate a more adequate model of good corporate character that would encompass other-regarding virtues.     

亚里士多德《政治学》的法律思想解读

亚里士多德的《政治学》蕴含着卓越的古代法律思想;道德为先、财产私有;法治优于人治;慎重变法;法律拯救自由;重视法制教育,等等。     

试析亚里士多德的德性幸福论

古往今来许多哲人岛学说都涉及过幸福问题,但其中最具有智慧和影响力的要数古希腊思想家亚里士多德的幸福论。亚里士多德认为至善是幸福,幸福是灵魂合与德性的实现活动,只有具备一定德性的人才能够获得幸福。     

Introduction to the Special Issue on the Impact of Network Ethics on Business Practices

Modern public relations practices have been dominated by appeals to impulses, desires, and images that affect publics defined predominantly in demographic terms. This paper argues that abandoning basic rhetorical assumptions about the ability of ordinary people to engage in practical reason has serious ethical implications for the marketplace as well as for society in general. The study applies recent rhetorical scholarship on issues of public discourse and rhetorical culture to public relations practices, considering how rhetoric can contribute to more effective and ethical public discourse in our dominant modes of marketplace communication.     

Robots and us: towards an economics of the ‘Good Life’

(Expected) adverse effects of the ‘ICT Revolution’ on work and opportunities for individuals to use and develop their capacities give a new impetus to the debate on the societal implications of technology and raise questions regarding the ‘responsibility’ of research and innovation (RRI) and the possibility of achieving ‘inclusive and sustainable society’. However, missing in this debate is an examination of a possible conflict between the quest for ‘inclusive and sustainable society’ and conventional economic principles guiding capital allocation (including the funding of research and innovation). We propose that such conflict can be resolved by re-examining the nature and purpose of capital, and by recognising mainstream economics’ utilitarian foundations as an unduly restrictive subset of a wider Aristotelian understanding of choice.     

试论康德道德形而上学德性论的“建筑术”——兼与亚里士多德幸福论德性论“建筑术”比较

建筑术（architectonic）的问题在康德整个思想体系一直都是重要的。康德所理解的建筑术是一种理性的先天架构。从康德全部思想体系中的先天思想如何层层演绎和推理角度，可以探究其思想建筑术的线索；从康德德性论道德形而上学基本概念和论证出发，可以考察其建筑术之运思。亚里士多德幸福论的德性论中也存在建筑术，通过比较亚里士多德与康德建筑术，可以深化对两种德性论建筑术及其道德意识结构的理解。康德的德性论建筑术是一种道德性的建筑术，德性论中道德意识结构，即德行（Tugend）的存有论是行动出于德性（Sittlichkeit）；而亚氏的则属于目的性的建筑术，德性论中的道德意识结构则是灵魂合于逻各斯的中道选择。     

Personhood and Human Richness: Good and Well-Being in the Capability Approach and Beyond

This paper aims at developing the Capability Approach's (CA) underlying philosophical anthropology and ethics by focusing on the work of its major exponents, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. I first discuss CA's critique of happiness as subjective well-being and defend the idea of ‘flourishing’ which ultimately refers to the Aristotelian concept of eudaimonia. I then focus on the notions of ‘good’ and ‘well-being’ and address the problem of the compatibility between a substantive notion of the Good (expressed through universal moral values) and individual preferences. I thus tackle the issue of adaptive preferences (which is investigated both from a methodological and an ethical perspective) and suggest that the process of adaptation should be thought in the dynamic frame of the constitution of the self. Therefore, in the second half of the paper I investigate the CA's idea of personhood and focus on some important assumptions behind its underlying anthropological model – above all the notion of ‘human richness’. As a result, I first point out the dynamic dimension of personhood, according to which individuals are ‘becoming themselves’ in search of self-realisation and construction of their identities. Second, I highlight its relational dimension, according to which every one is the expression of the anthropological richness and at the same time represents the highest possibility of richness for every other one.