仲裁裁决司法审查制度的完善

仲裁裁决是仲裁庭对仲裁当事人争议的实体问题所作出的结论性意见，它与终局判决具有相同的效力。为了保证仲裁裁决的公正性和仲裁程序的合法性，仲裁裁决的既判力仍应受到法律必要的控制与审查。为了保证仲裁裁决的稳定性和权威性，对仲裁裁决司法审查应限定在一定范围之内。科学的划定司法审查的范围，即对仲裁裁决进行适度的审查，不仅有助于仲裁优势的充分发挥，保证仲裁价值目标的实现，还能促进我国仲裁制度的发展和完善。     

论普通商事仲裁管辖对法院管辖的排除

有效的仲裁协议是仲裁机构受理商事纠纷的前提，也是排除法院管辖权的依据。当事人有关仲裁协议有效性的争议将会动摇仲裁管辖的基础。本文从分析仲裁管辖的依据入手，探讨了仲裁管辖与法院管辖之间的界限，结合国际上仲裁管辖制度的最新发展，提出我国应进一步放宽对仲裁管辖权的限制，以促进仲裁事业的发展。     

Experimental evidence of gender effects in arbitration decisions

The study investigates arbitrator gender and arbitrator-grievant gender effects on the decisions of 146 arbitrators rendered on a hypothetical sexual harassment case. Gender was not found to have a statistically significant effect on the decisions examined. However, other characteristics of the arbitrator—level of experience and level of education—were found to influence the arbitral decision.     

The “Iron Law of Paternalism” in Employee Grievances and Arbitration? A Comparison of Disciplinary and Nondisciplinary Cases

In the criminology literature, the iron law of paternalism suggests that women receive less serious sanctions in the judicial system. This examination of three years of grievance outcomes (n= 1216) and arbitration outcomes (n= 1146) tests this iron law in the context of organizational disciplinary and dispute resolutions. These data, across several levels of outcomes (win, lose, compromise), controlling for the severity of grievances (disciplinary/nondisciplinary) and arbitrations (termination/nontermination) provide no support for the paternalistic thesis. Moreover, we find no support for the paternalistic thesis with regard to either the incidence or length of suspensions as a function of gender.     

临时仲裁在我国金融仲裁机制中的引入分析

我国临时仲裁机制的缺失带来了种种弊端,作为完善路径的选择,我国可以采用"试点方式"逐步将临时仲裁机制引入仲裁体系。当前金融仲裁方兴未艾,金融纠纷解决的特性及其对临时仲裁的需求,使得金融仲裁成为进行临时仲裁"试点"工作的适当领域。在具体制度构建方面,可从临时金融仲裁的法律地位与基本原则、仲裁协议内容与效力、仲裁员选任与监督、与仲裁机构的支持及法院对临时金融仲裁的监督等方面进行。     

整合国际商会系统资源强化服务企业功能

随着我国开放型经济的不断发展和不断深入,外贸工作的重点经历着从单纯的出口型像双向型的转换,外贸工作的效果经历着从数量上堆积到注重外贸经济质量的转型,这就要求我们国际商会人在思想和行动上,在继承和总结以往工作的基础上,从根本上对国际商会事业大胆创新、大胆突破,拓展国际商会工作的空间。在外向型经济日益发展的今天,如何利用商会的优势,拓展法律服务的内容,提高法律服务的水平,是值得思考的问题。     

浅析国际商事仲裁的证据标准

国际商事仲裁证据复杂,在探讨证据标准考察了国际商事仲裁证据制度的基本价值取向;探讨了诉讼中和国际商事仲裁中证据标准的差异和各自特点;结合对诉讼证据特征的分析,参考有关仲裁实践与规则制定,归纳了国际商事仲裁证据标准的自有特征,藉以对理解国际商事仲裁证据,及完善我国涉外仲裁证据规则有所助益。     

Mandatory and binding arbitration: Effects on employee attitudes and recruiting results

This paper reports the results of two studies undertaken in the same Fortune 500 company as it adopted an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program. Study 1 assessed employees' perceptions of fairness, trust, and turnover intentions regarding ADR options. Compared with other options for ADR, a program consisting of mandatory mediation followed by mandatory and binding arbitration (MMBA) resulted in significantly lower levels of procedural fairness perception, organizational trust, and intentions to stay with the firm. Contrary to previous research, no significant effects were found related to respondents' demographic characteristics and their reactions to ADR program characteristics. In Study 2, job‐applicant flow data were evaluated and compared by corporate region to determine the effects of an MMBA program installed in one region. Results revealed no significant effects related to the MMBA program on the organization's ability to recruit and ultimately fill key positions. As in Study 1, no significant effects were found in Study 2 for the demographic characteristics of applicant race/ethnicity, gender, or age on applicant recruitment decisions. Although Study 2 results indicated job candidates are unaffected by the existence of an MMBA program, given Study 1's results, practitioners should be cautious about implementing such a program for current employees. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

浅析国际商事仲裁一裁终局制度的局限与完善

视一裁终局为国际商事仲裁的主要优点并将其绝对化,是我国学术界的普遍观念,而《仲裁法》也规定仲裁实行一裁终局的制度。然而,随着国际经济交往规模的扩大,一裁终局在国际商事仲裁实践中的缺陷逐一显现。本文通过分析,提出对"一裁终局"绝对存在性和绝对优越性的质疑,指出一裁终局的缺陷,进而提出在一裁终局制度上,我国仲裁法应当区分国内仲裁与国际商事仲裁,在国际商事仲裁中摈弃绝对的一裁终局制度。     

CISG视角下争议解决费用的分摊

在国际货物销售合同纠纷中,争议解决费用往往是不可忽视的内容。在此基础之上,探讨CISG视角下的争议解决费用分摊问题兼具理论和实际意义。理论和实践中就CISG能否成为分摊争议解决费用的依据存在不同做法。差异背后的深层次原因在于有关方对CISG的立法精神和解释规则存在理解上的不同。本文支持依CISG分摊争议解决费用的观点,因为这不仅更契合于公约的精神,也更能实现公约适用的统一。域外的相关公约实践对我国同样具有借鉴意义。对于我国的有关实践,本文有4点建议:通过合同条款对争议解决费用的分摊加以明确;明确争议解决费用分摊的请求权基础;裁判主体应克服国内法思维,恪守公约精神进行条款的解释与适用;进一步明确争议解决费用分摊的国内法规则,从而实现国际法与国内法适用的统一。