借鉴与反思：我国相对独立量刑程序之确立

我国传统刑事审判没有明确区分定罪阶段和量刑阶段,这在一定程度上影响了量刑的公开透明性以及量刑调查与辩论的充分性,难以保证量刑的公正性和裁判的说服力。囚此,在立足我国现行刑事司法政策、立法与司法实践的基础上,借鉴英美等国量刑程序制度的合理内核,确立“相对独立”的量刑程序,是实现司法公正的必然要求。最高人民法院《关于规范量刑程序若干问题的意见》在全国的试行,标志着相对独立的量刑程序在我国正式确立。该司法解释对刑事庭审案件有区别地设置量刑审理程序;确立了检察机关的量刑建议制度、被告方和被害方量刑意见制度、裁判方说明理由制度等等,但这一改革方案仍需在实践中进一步探索与完善。     

"一分为三"十七年之争

在哲学上关于"一分为三"的命题已经争论了十七年,作者认为"一分为三"具有普遍性并论证其产生的根源及其理论与实践意义.虽然,这场争论中各方各执一辞,但作者希望能逐步确立这一命题,建构立体化的马克思主义哲学原理.     

凯恩斯主义与新自由主义的“争”与“合”

20世纪30年代至今,凯恩斯主义与新自由主义一直处于针锋相对的状态。尽管两者的理论主张背道而驰,但都曾陷入无法挽救经济危机的窘境。在欧洲主权债务危机和国际金融危机爆发后的后危机时代,世界亟待构建新的理论框架,各国亟需择取有效的宏观经济政策,由此才能促进国家经济增长。将这两者有效结合将不失为一个明智之举。     

对抗战初期关于高等教育方针争论的几点评价

抗日战争初期关于高等教育方针的争论,实质上是一场关于知识分子在国家危急存亡之时所应担当的角色和责任问题的讨论,是人们对特殊时期高等教育所作的独特思考。这场争论对推动国民政府制定＂平时教育＂政策起了促进作用,它使更多的人认识到：＂天下兴亡,匹夫有责＂,知识分子不仅是社会的＂匹夫＂,更是民族文化的承载者,他们的能量既在战时,更在战后。同时,这场争论还有助于人们深入认识大学的时代使命。此外,这场争论的结果对保护、发展我国现代高等教育事业,打破日本帝国主义灭亡中国文化的阴谋也起到了不可低估的作用。     

Interrogating sustainable productivism: Lessons from the ‘Almerían miracle’

Many have suggested that a new form of sustainable agricultural productivism is needed in response to the challenges to food security posed by climate change and population growth. This paper employs elements of ecological modernisation theory and focusses on sustainability challenges and solutions, as well as the knowledge networks and production rationale to assess whether the intensive horticultural industry located in the Spanish province of Almería represents sustainable productivism. The Almerían horticultural industry, lauded as an example of neo-endogenous growth, manifests a range of sustainable technologies addressing environmental impacts. Yet, we argue that Almerían horticulture represents ‘weak ecological modernisation’ and its main sustainability challenges are posed by water scarcity, a demand led production rationale and the precarious situation of family farms that at present provide a degree of economic embeddedness in this highly industrialised production model. A competitive imperative yields marketing organisations huge sway in production decision-making, and while a cost-price squeeze has driven efficiency in the use of farm inputs and product innovation, it has paradoxically made further advances in sustainable water management very difficult to achieve. Transforming the Almerían horticultural industry into a truly sustainable model of productivism would require the concerted efforts of individual farmers and marketing organisations as well as regional and local water governance institutions and land use planning. A significant obstacle to this remains the dominant normative perception that justifies groundwater abstraction on the grounds of its high economic returns and the perceived inability of small farmers to invest in desalinated water or further technological solutions.     

辩论主义与我国民事诉讼辩论原则的比较研究

辩论主义是大陆法系国家民事诉讼法学中规定当事人有权能和责任收集诉讼资料的一项原则,辩论主义仅是当事人主义的重要内容和必不可少的一环。本文旨在理清辩论主义乃是当事人主义诉讼模式特性的一个重要方面的反映,它与我国民事诉讼辩论原则有着根本的区别。