排序方式: 共有26条查询结果,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
Wu Wentao 《生态经济(英文版)》2006,2(4):442-448
1. Introduction Domestic waste has become a worldwide hazard. It has been listed in Preferential Programmes in China for 21st Century. The combination of the three techniques, the transformation of domestic waste into useful resources, the reduction of do- mestic waste and the innocent treatment of domes- tic waste is the long-term guideline in China. In the spirit of the guideline, several laws and regulations have been enacted, including Technical Standards of Municipal Solid Landfill, … 相似文献
2.
徐州市雁群卫生填埋场渗滤液治理工程针对城市生活垃圾场渗滤液可生化性差、氨氮含量高等特点,采用了吹脱-混凝沉淀-A2/O的处理工艺.介绍了工艺的设计参数、特点、运行情况和技术经济参数,结果表明,该工艺出水水质达到了<生活垃圾填埋污染控制标准>(GB 16889-1997)的二级标准. 相似文献
3.
ABR工艺在处理垃圾渗滤液中具有其他厌氧生物反应器所达不到的优点。尤其是对B/C低、氨氮浓度高、COD浓度高的废水处理,通过调节回流比、HRT、碱度等参数后,可以取得很好的处理效果。在本次实验中,HRT控制在18h后明显提高的垃圾渗滤液的可生化性及C/N,使ABR出水CODcr去除率达到75%,C/N为6.72,对后续好氧反应起到了重要作用。在调控一定回流比后,为提供厌氧氨氧化所需的电子受体NO-3和NO-2实现脱氮。反应器在经过120d的培养驯化,氨氮进水为460mg/L,ABR对氨氮的去除率稳定在80%。不同格室的厌氧颗粒污泥都得到很好的驯化并在其合适的环境中发挥各自的功能。 相似文献
4.
高浓度氨氮渗滤液脱氦方式的比较及选择 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
氨氮浓度高是垃圾渗滤液的水质特征之一,目前对于高浓度氨氮废水的处理方法主要有硝化—反硝化、氨吹脱法、化学沉淀法以及新型生物脱氮技术。基于工程实例,对国内外已有的去除垃圾渗滤液高浓度氨氮的方法进行了阐述和对比,并对渗滤液处理厂脱氮方式的选择提出了建议。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
分析了太原市垃圾卫生填埋场渗滤液的来源、组成及对环境的影响 ,提出几点控制措施 ,减少填埋处置对环境的污染 相似文献
9.
城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理工艺及其研究进展 总被引:13,自引:0,他引:13
垃圾渗滤液污染物浓度高 ,水质水量变化大 ,是国内外污水处理的难题。综述了垃圾渗滤液的生物、物理化学、土地和循环回灌处理法 ,分析了各种处理方法的特点 ,讨论了国内外渗滤液处理研究的进展 ,列举了我国几大垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理工艺。认为生物法与物理化学法结合将是未来渗滤液处理研究的主要方向。经济高效的脱氨氮方法能大大提高后续生物处理效率 相似文献
10.
Using choice question formats to determine compensable values: The case of a landfill-siting process 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Siting noxious facilities, such as community landfills, is a challenging problem for local planners who recognize the importance of economic efficiency and equity, political acceptance, and meeting federal regulatory standards. Meeting these criteria requires technical and socio-economic analyses in conjunction with public input. Planners may also recognize that political acceptance requires compensation for the host community, either in the form of monetary or in-kind transfers. Following Breffle and Rowe [Breffle, W.S., Rowe. R.D., 2002. Comparing choice question formats for evaluating natural resource tradeoffs. Land Econ. 78 (2), 298–314], we use a “resource-to-resource” paired-comparison survey method to estimate compensatory values associated with an in-county landfill for both the host and non-host communities. Our results indicate that while a host-community household's minimum willingness to accept payment for hosting a landfill may exceed a non-host-community household's maximum willingness to pay, a large difference in population sizes between the two communities enables the landfill to pass a Kaldor potential compensation test. 相似文献