|
|||||
|
|
An Examination and Validation of Linguistic Constructs for Studying High-Stakes Deception |
|
| Authors: | Christie M. Fuller David P. Biros Judee Burgoon Jay Nunamaker |
| Affiliation: | 1. College of Business, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 10318, Ruston, LA, 71272, USA 2. Oklahoma State University, 415 Business Bldg, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA 3. Edith Cowen University, Perth, Australia 4. Center for the Management of Information, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA 5. Soldwedel Professor of Management Information Systems, Communication, and Computer Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA |
| Abstract: | Theories of deception have produced upwards of 150 potential verbal and nonverbal communication indicators. Of these, approximately 30 indicators, or cues, have been used previously with automated linguistic analysis tools to study text-based communication. The current research examines the interrelationships among these cues and proposes a set of specific constructs to be validated for high-stakes deception research. We analyzed linguistic-based cues extracted from 367 written statements prepared by suspects and victims of crimes on military bases. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate two models. The superior model retained seven constructs: quantity, specificity, affect, diversity, uncertainty, nonimmediacy, and activation. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |