首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance?
Institution:1. Department of Communication Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;2. Wunderman Thompson, Antwerp, Belgium;3. Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Netherlands;1. Department of Broadcasting & Journalism, College of Fine Arts & Communication, Western Illinois University, 318 Sallee Hall, 1 University Cir, Macomb, IL 61455-1390, USA;2. Media Effects Research Laboratory, Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications, The Pennsylvania State University, 122 Carnegie Building, University Park, PA 16802-5101, USA;1. Department of Management – University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34, 40126 Bologna, Italy;2. Department of Management – University of Bristol, Priory Road Complex, Priory Road, BS81TU Bristol, UK
Abstract:Currently, online retailers evaluate whether chatbots—software programs that interact with users using natural languages—could improve their customers' satisfaction. In a retail context, chatbots allow humans to pose shopping-related questions and receive answers in natural language without waiting for a salesperson or using other automated communication forms. However, until now, it has been unclear which customers accept this new communication form and which factors determine their acceptance. In this paper, we contrast the well-known technology acceptance model (TAM) with the lesser known uses and gratifications (U&G) theory, applying both approaches to measure the acceptance of the text-based “Emma” chatbot by its target segment. “Emma” was developed for the prepurchase phase of online fashion retailing and integrated into Facebook Messenger by the major German online retailer Zalando. Data were collected from 205 German Millennial respondents in a usability study. The results show that both utilitarian factors such as “authenticity of conversation” and “perceived usefulness,” as well as hedonic factors such as “perceived enjoyment”, positively influence the acceptance of “Emma”. However, privacy concerns and the immaturity of the technology had a negative effect on usage intention and frequency. The predictive power of both models was similar, showing little deviation, but U&G gives alternative insights into the customers’ motivation to use “Emma” compared to the TAM.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号