首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A compact city for the wealthy? Employment accessibility inequalities between occupational classes in the London metropolitan region 2011
Institution:1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Twente, the Netherlands;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, United States;3. Center for Metropolitan Studies and Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil;1. 777 Glades Road, Building SO 44 Room 284, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, United States;2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 5320, United States
Abstract:The prevalence of gentrification and housing marketisation processes in many cities points to increasingly wealthy inner-city areas and potentially greater population segregation by income. It is plausible that these trends are contributing to regional accessibility inequalities, though quantitative research testing this link is limited. This paper examines differences in employment accessibility between Standard Occupational Classification groups in the London Metropolitan Region for 2011 for car, transit, bus only and walking modes. Additionally, changes in occupational class populations 2006–2016 are considered, revealing continuing inner-city gentrification. Employment accessibility is calculated using cumulative measures, based on travel times from multi-modal network modelling. The results show that while car accessibility is relatively equal between occupational classes, public transport, bus and walk accessibility have significant inequalities favouring professional classes. Low income groups have lower accessibility for the most affordable bus and walk modes, and inequalities are greater for residents in the wider metropolitan region. Furthermore, professional groups combine accessibility advantages with the highest rates of owner occupation, maximising housing wealth benefits. Lower income groups are exposed to rent increases, though this is offset by social housing, which remains the most prevalent tenure in Inner London for low income classes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号