How the quality of initial coin offering white papers influences fundraising: Using security token offerings white papers as a benchmark |
| |
Authors: | Shih-Chu Chou Zhe-An Li Tawei Wang Ju-Chun Yen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Accounting, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, USA;2. Graduate Institute of Accounting, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan;3. School of Accountancy and MIS, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;4. Graduate Institute of Accounting and Department of Finance, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan |
| |
Abstract: | In recent years, many initial coin offerings (ICOs) scams have been reported, attracting attention to this relatively new and unregulated ICO market, which lacks disclosure requirements and therefore suffers from intensifying problems of information asymmetry inherent in crowdfunding. As a prospectus-type document, an ICO white paper serves as a major means of voluntary disclosure practices adopted by ventures seeking external financing. Given the importance of an ICO white paper and the difficulty of assessing its quality, we propose to benchmark it against white paper content for security token offerings (STOs)—a more regulated ICO subset. Using the similarity of ICO white papers with STO white papers to proxy for disclosure quality, we document that the ICO campaigns that have white papers more similar to STO white papers are more likely to raise funding successfully. Our findings provide implications for policymakers, ICO fundraisers, and investors on the importance of white paper quality. |
| |
Keywords: | initial coin offerings security token offerings white paper |
|
|