首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


National versus private brand: A regulatory focus perspective
Affiliation:1. School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang district, Shenzhen 518172, China;2. Department of Management and Marketing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Hong Kong;1. School of Business, Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Diagonal Las Torres 2700, Santiago, Chile;2. Universitat Ramon Llull, ESADE, Av. Torre Blanca 59, Barcelona, Spain;3. McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, 3700 O Street, N.W., Washington DC 20057, United States
Abstract:Why do consumers choose a private versus national brand? A between-subjects factorial design was used to address this question in two product categories: shampoo and athletic shoes. Three determining factors were used—regulatory focus: promotion versus prevention; brand types: national versus private; and attribute framing: hedonic versus utilitarian—to predict consumer attitude towards the brand, its ad, and purchase intention. The results provide support for the interactions between regulatory focus and attribute framing for shampoo, and between regulatory focus and brand types for shoes. When exposed to shampoo ads, promotion focused consumers have a more positive attitude toward the ad and a higher purchase intention if the ad features utilitarian rather than hedonic attributes. Further, both promotion and prevention focused consumers prefer national brands of shoes to private labels. One possible explanation may lie in private versus public consumption of shampoo and shoes.
Keywords:National brand  Private brand  Regulatory focus  Attribute framing
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号