首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


After Shleifer,who needs Mises?
Authors:Anna B Faria  John Robert Subrick
Institution:1. Department of Economics, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA;2. Department of Economics, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA
Abstract:The demise of socialism in Eastern Europe and the transition to a market economy in China and India marked the end of traditional comparative economics as a field. The debate between capitalism and socialism was settled. The economic calculation argument of Ludwig von Mises seemed no longer relevant. In its place, the new comparative economics (NCE) arose. The NCE focuses on the institutional differences that affect the protection of contract and property rights. The research program of Andrei Shleifer has provided numerous insights into how markets operate. This paper examines the Shleifer-inspired program in comparative economics in light of the economic calculation argument Mises made. Although the recent developments in comparative economics have extended and complemented the contributions of Mises, it has not displaced them. An account of the economic calculation problem is still missing in the new comparative economics.
Keywords:Coase theorem  comparative economics  legal origins  proper scope of government
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号